I like it, but I hate Ruger!
You see, when Harris ordered the enforcement of the microstamping law in California, Ruger was one of the big name companies who ABANDONED California in terms of sales of AR's and semiautomatic handguns, while continuing to reap big profits from revolver and rifle sales. They should NOT be rewarded for this. Ruger could, at this very moment, be selling every single handgun they had on the "Roster" prior to the microstamping order, but they intentionally CHOSE to abandon Californians by removing all their semiautomatic handguns from the market (though grandfathered) save for the 380.
I appreciate what Ruger has done with the 9mm carbine, though I think they should have offered a 10mm version, but when I consider buying a 9mm carbine I think Chiappa M1-9mm because at least THEY didn't abandon our market with their semiautomatic handgun products while exploiting our "dollars" to buy everything else.
I own TWO Chiappa M1-22 Carbines - one with wood stock, the other with polymer and both have been stellar performers. I also own a Chiappa .17-10 SA revolver that holds 10 rounds of .17 HMR and is amazingly nice with a $200 range price tag. So I'm no stranger to Chiappa. I also own a Chiappa Rhino .357 5". When I think of a 9mm carbine I think of the Chiappa M1 version. The only thing Ruger has that would draw me in is the Glock magazine system, though the Chiappa M1-9 uses the Beretta magazine which is just as easy to source. Now if they'd just make a .22 TCM9R version!