- Joined
- Apr 21, 2021
- Messages
- 4,880
- Reaction score
- 8,289
Someone once told me that in recent decades Generals with 2 or more stars today are more Washington politicians than warriors walking in the footsteps of General Patton.
So we go in and take on the Taliban, aka enemy, spend twenty years there establishing and maintaining some semblance of order. Then we pull out and willingly hand the country over to the enemy and leave all of our war material there including advanced aircraft, small arms and munitions?
Now two powerful adversaries are lining up to get in bed with the enemy without any way for us to intervene.
Then we leave on the enemy’s time line without making sure we have all of our citizens out of the country.
Sure sounds like defeat to me. Cannot think of another word to describe it.
"Nation Building" was doomed to fail when the general populace has no coherent self-recognition of a 'national identity' as an Afghan - rather than as a member of one of many tribes. The concept of a Jeffersonian Democracy springing out of the sand was ultimately western hubris.
It was past time to depart. Arguably we should have left after disposing of Osama Bin Ladin - the reason we went there in the first place.
And leaving was always going involve a degree of chaos.
But the depth of failure and lack of planning & execution in this case is truly, historically staggering - it is not what we did, but *how we did it* that will go down in history as a failure of a magnitude seldom seen in American History.
Nope. Not gonna happen. SorryIt may very well be that the U.S.
has learned from this war's history
and will not repeat it again with
deep entanglements in other
countries' cultures and potential
civil wars.