Another bear thread! SO HAPPY!!!! *dances*
If I am deliberately hunting bear with a handgun I'm going to think seriously about a .454, .460, or a .500. However, I have no plans to hunt a bear with a handgun. I do want to do it someday, but I'll be bringing a rifle in .35 Whelen when I go.
So that brings us back to self defense against bears.
Sometimes I think Cooper was either stupid or hitting the pipe to often.
Au contraire!
Colonel Cooper was neither stupid nor high, and I do believe he was exactly on track. The average shooter, let's say me, medium to short in height depending on your point of view, average build, not able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, etc. So if you are a foot taller, 50 pounds heaver or just built like a weight lifter then we're different but - if you're an average shooter - then you don't have much over me in terms of what you can handle effectively in handguns.
Thus, I can state categorically that I can accurately shoot six rounds out of any of my .357 Magnum revolvers (real, steel .357s, not Scandium things simply capable of handling the cartridge) - loaded with full house magnum cartridges - in a relatively short period of time.
The average shooter with experience can do that.
The average shooter cannot do that with full house .44s and up. Some guys can, I won't say it cannot be done. But that's not average. If I have a bear, at 400 pounds or 1200 pounds, thinking about making a run at me, from any distance, I want 6 rounds of high impact lead hitting his body. That says .357 Magnum. Cooper was correct.
If the bruin is still coming after that, well, then it's time to say adios, sayonara, good bye and good luck.
Putting my money where my mouth is, I was in bear country this past summer and that's what I brought with me, a 4" Ruger Service Six, with which I am pretty darned good - no brag, just fact. I could have brought any of my other .357s, including my short barreled ones, except I was putting the gun on a plane and I didn't want to risk my S&Ws.
***GRJ***