Quality of Modern 686 vs Pre-Lock 686

B

BCWood64

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
56
Reaction score
118
Location
Long Island. NY
I'm looking to add a 4inch 686 to my collection. I've been trying to track down a pre-lock 686 but wondering if its worth the price jump over a brand new 686. I can get a 686 4' right now from Buds for less then 600 dollars with military discount. I know over the years they added the lock, MIM parts like trigger and hammer just wanted to see if its really worth that price difference? Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register to hide this ad
I would first try to get my hands on a 686-4 plus, then any other pre-lock, then a new one. Note that the 686 no dash model had a recall. If the recall work was done there will be an M stamped in the yoke area of the frame.

That being said there is nothing mechanically wrong with the new guns. They shoot extremely well. They just dont have collector value.
 
I had a 686-2, a 686-5 and still have a 686-6, each in 4". The -2 was a square butt, the others round butts. I could not tell the difference in trigger pull, smoothness, etc. I gave the 686-5 to my brother as a retirement gift, and I sold the 686-2. The 686-6 is my nightstand gun. It is far more accurate than I am.

A new 686 for less that $600 is a good deal. If it were my money, and I was buying a shooter, I'd go with the new gun at that price.
 
I personally would buy pre-mim/lock. Why buy a new one that would lose value vs buying old and maintaining its value. Gunbroker prices seem to be inflated. With saying that i would like to own a 627 PC
 
For me its not so much that the new guns are not solid its that they lack the classic look of the older ones. The redesign of the rear of the frame to first add the frame mounted firing pin (I can tolerate -5 models) then a few years later the addition of even more material for the lock mechanism IMO totally ruined the classic look of the revolver. The hole in the side for the lock and and current style of stamping on the barrel reduces the appeal even more.

I would advise you to search for a nice pre lock version. I like the -3 with the flash chrome hammer and trigger,square butt and original wood target grips. The -3 also had design improvements over the earlier versions.
 

Attachments

  • euro sport 010.JPG
    euro sport 010.JPG
    101.1 KB · Views: 265
Last edited:
I know this isn't a proper answer to your question but I have three L frames. Two are modern production 686s and a 586 prelock with a less than common 3' barrel. As far as quality they are all really nice shooting pistols. If my life depended on it I wouldn't hesitate to grab anyone of them. Though if I'm just going out to the range I'm taking the modern Smith's because I don't want to feel bad about beating up the 586.
 
grip frame said:
For me its not so much that the new guns are not solid its that they lack the classic look of the older ones. The redesign of the rear of the frame to first add the frame mounted firing pin (I can tolerate -5 models) then a few years later the addition of even more material for the lock mechanism IMO totally ruined the classic look of the revolver. The hole in the side for the lock and and current style of stamping on the barrel reduces the appeal even more.

I would advise you to search for a nice pre lock version. I like the -3 with the flash chrome hammer and trigger,square butt and original wood target grips. The -3 also had design improvements over the earlier versions.
Click to expand...
Trust Me Find A Dash -3 You Will Keep The Dash 3 For Life Do A Search On The Dash 3 THe Finast Version Of The 686 Period
 
BCWood64 said:
I'm looking to add a 4inch 686 to my collection.
Click to expand...
If your acquiring with an eye toward perceived value and resale, then get a pre-lock. If you just want to shoot and have worry-free fun with it, get the one at Bud's.

Even with a lock, you'll still get most of your money back if you want to sell it, especially with your discount.
 
Last edited:
I know what you mean about price difference I've seen some nice pre-locks in my LGSs and pawn shops nearing $800 and the $200 difference isn't chump change to me. But having said that, I'd rather have the pre-lock. I have a 686 no dash with 2.5 in. barrel and 686-3 with 4 inch barrel and a Md 681 no dash with 4 inch barrel. All three are fantastic guns.
 
I own 3 pre 97 686s and like them. However there is something to look for on the used 686 market and that is the condition. Check the BC gap it should be .006 to .008. Headspace should be .062 to .064. BC alignment with no rubs or ticks and extractor rod straightness. Carryup, trigger pull and let off. Overall cosmetics along with barrel and cylinder condition. Firing pin and bushing condition. Unless you are gunsmith savy and can fix these things yourself, they are the items that would make it worth buying or not. Versis a new 686 with the factory warrantee.
 
Inflation

BCWood64 said:
I'm looking to add a 4inch 686 to my collection. I've been trying to track down a pre-lock 686 but wondering if its worth the price jump over a brand new 686. I can get a 686 4' right now from Buds for less then 600 dollars with military discount...
Click to expand...


FWIW, I paid $315 + $18.90tx of ($333.90) for my 4in 686nodash back in August of 1986. I just ran an online inflation calculator and in 2016 dollars it comes out as $736.44 tax included.

So YES, new 686 4in guns are cheaper today than they were in 1986. That premium for "no-dash" really is not a premium IMO, just inflation kicking in.

And yes, I still have my original receipt... :D
 
You know the old saying about opinions. With that said, here's mine:

For the difference in cost, if you are buying it to use it, go new. It has a guaranty and IMHO, is every bit as good as any L frame Smith & Wesson has produced, and in some ways, better. I hadn't any experience working on a MIM gun until I bought a 617. When I took it apart to do a trigger job, it took me a lot less time than a pre-lock gun would have taken. The MIM parts are already smooth, so there's little to no stoning required, other than to the machine marks on the frame. If you are buying to shoot a little and for an investment, the pre-lock would be a better choice.
 
I'm also curious about the quality of the new guns I'm specifically looking for a 686 4 inch and will mostly be looking at new manufacture. I've never owned a newer smith so I don't know what there like. I would love to find a older square butt, no lock, six shot 686 but I don't think that will happen at least without a big difference in price. So its either a new standard 686 or a stainless gp100.
 
I have both, a 2.5" prelock, and a 4" and a 3" with the IL. I can't seem to detect any difference in the quality. All are 686+s.

I paid $350 for the 2.5" some time ago, used, no box, gorgeous rosewood, after market stocks - could be early 1990s, could be 1980s. It's a dash 4 so we can always look it up to see when those were made. For no reason that matters I had a trigger job done; it was actually quite unnecessary.

The 4" I bought about 2 years ago, maybe 3, and the retail price before I got hit with a premium I didn't see coming was $850 or $900. I don't do business with that brick and mortar auction house any longer. I think I paid $725 for the 3" last year, from a Forum member. Both of these were NIB. Neither of them needs or will ever get a trigger job while I own them.

They all shoot great and the 3" graduated to replace the 2.5" as my nighttime gun. The 4" gun is my packin' pistol woods gun. But the 2.5" won't be ignored..... :)

My 586 no lock has a 6" barrel - my oh my is that gun ever accurate at distance!

Just for the record, I actually EDC 2" K frames but I love the utility of L frames for other purposes.
 
I've had more than a few of each over the years. Personally, I have had specimens of both that were better than others. As for trends, I have found little difference in "usable quality" in the latter series as a whole. In fact, I find that the internal fit and finish of the post lock versions tends to be more consistent. It takes very little to get them to pro/ performance center action standards.
I buy what I like regardless of lock or others opinions.
 
Last edited:
I had one of the new Model 66's (till I traded it to a buddy), and I could detect nothing that was sub-par. The (admittedly ugly) internal lock, and the MIM parts never really bugged me, on this or other modern Smiths I've had.
That being said, an early 4" 686 has been a grail gun of mine for decades, and they have a certain panache that the new ones just don't (I got to play with a buddy's new 686+ not long ago).
You'd be getting a nice deal from Buds, and it surely wouldn't be a bad move, but it sounds like deep down you're still kinda wanting an older pre-lock 686, so if you cheap out, are you going to regret it later?
And, if the money is a factor, what kind of deal will Buds give on a GP100? You'd probably save a hundred+ bucks, and as a range blaster, these are as good as anything (and better than most), and have customer service as good as S&W's.
Worth considering. ;)
 
Last edited:
What I'm looking for is a 357 magnum that I don't have to worry about what I shoot in it. I have a model 19 and its treated like a 38 special by me I can't remember the last time I shot 357s in it, and when I do there always 158 grain. I want a stainless steel 4 inch 357 that I can use for conceal carry and can shoot barn burning light 357s all day long. The dreaded 110 and 125 grain magnums that can crack a k frame's forcing cone. I really want stainless steel so when I carry it I wouldn't have to worry about the finish like blued or nickel gun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
686 vs 686+ rear sights
Replies
16
Views
847
Protocall_Design
P
D
686-4 6 shot pre lock.........
2
Replies
26
Views
749
Haycock
H
S
686-4 PLUS SNUB PRE-LOCK
Replies
15
Views
768
doubletapp357
D
N
686 plus w/o lock
Replies
7
Views
490
Engine49guy
Engine49guy
G
686 +
Replies
3
Views
310
bones001
B

Latest posts

Back
Top