15-22 Good first rifle?

Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Location
Mobile, AL
Hey guys, writing this because I am looking at purchasing something for my girlfriend who lives with me in Mobile, Alabama. She's home alone at because I am gone and she's talked to me about getting something.
She's 5'5 and weighs 105 pounds. She just started working out and can do 2 pushups and can run to the mailbox. I think that an AR would be easier for her to shoot than a handgun and would be a stepping stone for her to move up to a handgun. Also, It would be really fun to just own as I wouldn't be able to afford to shoot a 5.56/.223 rifle with her.

So is a 15-22 a good start for her (and fun for me) or should I be looking at handguns for her? I also intend to buy myself a 38/9mm handgun or shotgun later on.
 
Register to hide this ad
It's fun, definitely, and can be a good first rifle, although a simple bolt-action might be better to learn the fundamentals of shooting, if it is new to her.

If she wants a firearm for protection, however, the 15-22 is not what you want (flame shield: activate). Have her take a safety class, maybe find a range where you can rent various handguns, and see what she feels comfortable with. Larger calibers are not always better, if the person using them feels uncomfortable with them (i.e. A .500 Magnum will take care of bears & perps, sure, but your petite girlfriend will not want to handle it).
 
I did some googling for "ar-15 for home defense" as well as a search on this forum for it and it looked somewhat okay. I'd rather have her shoot something small like .22 to where she can actually be accurate.

I guess I could be trying to push the 15-22 because it would be a fun rifle and cheap to practice until I can afford a 5.56/.223 rifle.

I'm going to look into finding a safety class for her. I was going to just show her myself.
 
the 15-22 with laser and mounted flash light would be awsome for home defense , double tap to the head double tap to the body before he even hits the floor, about 3 rounds to many and prolly get you in trouble hehehe.
 
"Is a .22lr good enough for ...?" is a loaded question that fuels some crazy debates. I can see the both sides of the argument. I consider myself a "neutral".

This is my opinion, so take it for what it's worth. I strongly believe that defensive capability is a combination of three things:

1. The capability & skill level of the defensive shooter.
2. The caliber used.
3. Shot placement.

While the 15-22 wouldn't be my 1st choice to defend my home, I wouldn't feel uncomfortable using it to defend my home.

  • .22lr Low Recoil = Quick Follow Up Shots
  • Long sight radius
  • Red Dot
  • 25 Round Magazines
  • Low flash
  • Light Weight

All these combined make for an easy to handle rifle. I can place all 25 rounds in that magazine onto someone's head very rapidly.

If your girlfriend has never shot a firearm before, a .22lr rifle is the best way to introduce her to shooting. A larger caliber runs the risk of scaring / souring her to the idea of shooting.

If she gets the necessary training & instruction to be proficient with the 15-22, I don't see any reason for her not to use it for home defense. It's definitely better than a bat.

IMO...

Firearm > No Firearm
 
Last edited:
I must agree that .22LR's are not the best for home defense. But, if that is all that you have, it's better than dialing 911. My personal choice for home defense is a 12 gauge shotgun. You can get a Mossberg 500 for around $300. Don't worry, with a little practice your girlfriend can handle a shotgun. On the other hand, the M&P 15-22 is one fun gun!!
 
I must agree that .22LR's are not the best for home defense. But, if that is all that you have, it's better than dialing 911. My personal choice for home defense is a 12 gauge shotgun. You can get a Mossberg 500 for around $300. Don't worry, with a little practice your girlfriend can handle a shotgun. On the other hand, the M&P 15-22 is one fun gun!!

This is good advice. A 12ga is my primary home defense firearm. If I was concerned that my girlfriend couldn't handle a 12ga, I'd get her a 20ga.

Just keep in mind, a shotgun still needs to be properly aimed. Over a short distance, the shot/pellets won't spread out very far.
 
My wife (5'3", 125lbs) can shoot a 12ga better than I can. It's all about familiarity. Get her out on a range and shooting and she may take to it better than you expect.

The 15-22 would also be an adequate home defense platform for the reasons already given above.
 
To input my 2 cents... If you are considering a 22, get a 22 handgun. Easier to use, easier to access, put a bunch of shots on target, you get the same effect as the 15-22.

To me, low light sites are better than a laser. A laser pin points your location. Low light sight allow for quick aligning on target.

But to each his own. My main HD weapon, S&W automatic, 16 plus 1 in 9mm, with Tru Dot Tritium night sites.
 
As stated before, a .22 is better than nothing or a bat, but I'd prefer a handgun. There is another page on this forum about what happens to the body by different calibers. .22 will tear s*** up and put a damper on anyone's day.
 
"All these combined make for an easy to handle rifle. I can place all 25 rounds in that magazine onto someone's head very rapidly."

I hope you can explain how you needed to shoot that perp in the head 25 times and not have it turn out badly for you. "Mr. Jones, at what time did you determine the threat had ceased?"

I think a double barrel 20 gauge or even a .410 with the right loads in the face should do the deed. No problem with over penetration, low recoil and blast. If the situation dictates more firepower, then perhaps a higher level of training might be necessary. More gun doesn't mean things are going to go your way unless you know how to use it.

Happy New Year!

Hobie
 
"All these combined make for an easy to handle rifle. I can place all 25 rounds in that magazine onto someone's head very rapidly."

I hope you can explain how you needed to shoot that perp in the head 25 times and not have it turn out badly for you. "Mr. Jones, at what time did you determine the threat had ceased?"

sorry i have to disagree, If you have the right to shoot somebody than you have the right to kill them. If you dont have the right to kill them then you definatly dont have the right to shoot them. I myself will have no problem facing a jury of my peers after dumping 25 rnds into a perps face. the most i would get is a manslaughter charge, maybe face 2-3 years in the pen but guess what my family and my stuff is alive and well
 
"All these combined make for an easy to handle rifle. I can place all 25 rounds in that magazine onto someone's head very rapidly."

I hope you can explain how you needed to shoot that perp in the head 25 times and not have it turn out badly for you. "Mr. Jones, at what time did you determine the threat had ceased?"

sorry i have to disagree, If you have the right to shoot somebody than you have the right to kill them. If you dont have the right to kill them then you definatly dont have the right to shoot them. I myself will have no problem facing a jury of my peers after dumping 25 rnds into a perps face. the most i would get is a manslaughter charge, maybe face 2-3 years in the pen but guess what my family and my stuff is alive and well

Hey guys....

Hobie, thank you for bringing up a very valid legal point. My intent was to illustrate that with practice, .22lr rounds fired from a 15-22 can be placed on target accurately with quick follow ups. When posting I did not consider the legal consequences of doing so.

Hobie, I believe you go by the same screen name on other firearms forums. If so, I personally consider your posts to be credible and informative.

True_shooter, thank you for defending my position. You do bring up valid points. Alive is better than dead.

I have seen discussions on this topic get quickly heated. An intellectual discussion around the hypotheticals of a multiple shot scenario is a good thing. I've given it thought. If I'm ever really faced with the scenario, god forbid, I'm sure what I will do will be based upon a dynamically changing situation.

First priority is to stay alive. Second priority is to avoid prison.

What I can say is that I will shoot only when there is an immediate threat to my life or an individual I care about. I will shoot only if I am sure that the foreground to & background behind the threat is clear.

I will fire until:

  1. The advancing immediate threat to my life is dead ,or incapacitated to the point that he/she is no longer an immediate threat to my life.
  2. The individual retreats or flees. They are no longer an immediate threat to my life.

To mitigate any legal issues that will arise my planned statement to law enforcement is:

"There was an immediate threat to my life. I apologize officer. I'm experiencing the after effects of this, and I'm a bit shaken up. I will be happy to provide you a statement in the morning, with my lawyer present, after I have had some time to recover."


While I am not the criminal in this situation, I am prepared to be treated as if I were one.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. My intention of my statement was meant to call attention to the possible legal ramifications of dumping a full magazine into someone's head, not to be mean spirited.

I personally prefer the shotgun approach. Progessively ramp the loads up with intended effect in mind. Escalation of force sort to speak. Remember your loved ones on the other side of the wall and don't accidentally kill them with a overpenetrating load.

Keep the reliance on gizmos to a minimum as they will fail at the worst time. Batteries die, electronics fail. Murphy's laws and all that.

If you do decide on any kind of semi-auto, practice with dummy rounds in the magazine placed at random by your shooting partner to experience stoppages. Learn how to clear, re-load, and re-aquire under tight time constaints until it becomes second nature. Practice practice and yes practice!

Good luck and Happy New Year!!

Hobie
 
...I personally prefer the shotgun approach. Progessively ramp the loads up with intended effect in mind. Escalation of force sort to speak...

Hobie

Completely off topic, but I have a question for Hobie.

I agree with the shotgun. I have a Benelli Supernova Tactical with pistol grip because I shoot it better than a regular stock 870 with a bead sight.

I have a stock mag capacity of 4 shells.

What is your opinion of the progression shells to load?
 
The 15-22 was my first firearm and it's definitely my favorite out of my 3(.22lr, 9mm & 6.5x55 Swede) :) I'd never sell this thing.
 
Completely off topic, but I have a question for Hobie.

I agree with the shotgun. I have a Benelli Supernova Tactical with pistol grip because I shoot it better than a regular stock 870 with a bead sight.

I have a stock mag capacity of 4 shells.

What is your opinion of the progression shells to load?

I think that a couple of birdshot(big bb's)and then #1 buck should get their attention. If it were not for shooting through walls, #1 buck all around even though it's not too prone for shoot through. The birdshot in the face should stop the attack but if not, buck them.

Hobie
 
Back
Top