The 58 was more or less unsuccessful, and other than the recent cultish internet popularity, I don’t know of anyone who actually used/uses one
I am a BIG 41 Magnum fan. Ever since I accidentally bought my first one back in the eighties.
The 41 Magnum group photo is about 10 years old and is missing many additions.
![]()
This decision of yours is very easy for me as the Model 58 just has no visual appeal to me. So I have never owned one.
The 6" Model 57 would be me choice. That also happens the be the first 41 Magnum I ever owned, though mine is in nickel and still in my possession (lower left corner of group photo)
I never buy a gun because it is worth more than another gun. Monetary value/gain is meaningless if the gun does not speak to me in some way.
I buy for my personal enjoyment and satisfaction, not for profit
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I'm sure that I'll be corrected, but, in this Mod. 57, - Mod. 58 discussion, a very important factor, has been overlooked, or ignored. When S&W first offered the .41 Mag. revolver, and cartridge, a mod. 58 Mod. was also offered. The 58 was intended to be used for a lower priced, fixed sight, self defense weapon, and S&W recommended that only the lower powered, cast bullet, load be fired in it. Anyone that has tried the "full house" loads in a Mod.58 will surely agree, with S&W's recommendation. The poor choice, of using an over qualified, extremely powerful load for self defense, and, using the Mod. 58 for other than it's intended purpose is what this whole discussion is really about. That's my 2¢ opinion on this matter.
Chubbo
Exactly, the strength of the firearms was identical.Wasn’t the Model 58 supposed to be a police duty carry weapon? Metallurgically, they would be the same. It was just a cheaper version with no sights or frills designed so the average beat cop could afford one. The police wouldn’t be using just lowered power cast bullets.