I just picked up a excellent 98% S&W 422 at the gunshow. It has nice walnut grips and is blued. Mine is the 6" bbl with 2 12rd factory mags and manual. It has the adjustable sights as well. It came with a plastic box but not the S&W one. It also came with that orange takedown tool that fits between the slide and frame.
I got it for $200 OTD which I think it a good price considering it looked new and had the two 12rd mags. There was no wear on the outside of the gun, it was only when I field stripped it that I could tell it was fired. Very nice.
I have not shot it yet because the weather sucks. It feels great in my hand and I like the way it looks for the most part. The only thing I don't like about it is the grip angle. As this is just for the range and not self defense, grip angle is not that important. I would never own a gun with this grip angle for self defense. All my shots would end up in the dirt and not the bad guy!
Anyway, what is the general take on these guns? I have seen them for as low as $150 before but didn't buy them. I always wanted one for some reason and now I have one. Are they considered decent guns or were they a flop? I also own a Ruger MKII with 5.5" bull bbl in SS and a MKI in blue with 6" tapered bbl.
I paid $200 for the MKI and I am sure it is a better gun overall since I have owned many Ruger MK series over the years and they have been outstanding. I know there is not a better pistol for the money.
But, the S&W has something that the Ruger doesn't. It is lighter and feels like it wants to go with you plinking. I am now on the lookout for the 4" SS and alloy 622. I think would make a great trail gun if it is reliable. It seems like it is going to make a great informal plinker.
I just don't hear much about the 422 or 622. As I get older, I am gravitating towadrs owning more and more S&Ws. I am not trying to buy them but those are the guns I end up with.
I got it for $200 OTD which I think it a good price considering it looked new and had the two 12rd mags. There was no wear on the outside of the gun, it was only when I field stripped it that I could tell it was fired. Very nice.
I have not shot it yet because the weather sucks. It feels great in my hand and I like the way it looks for the most part. The only thing I don't like about it is the grip angle. As this is just for the range and not self defense, grip angle is not that important. I would never own a gun with this grip angle for self defense. All my shots would end up in the dirt and not the bad guy!
Anyway, what is the general take on these guns? I have seen them for as low as $150 before but didn't buy them. I always wanted one for some reason and now I have one. Are they considered decent guns or were they a flop? I also own a Ruger MKII with 5.5" bull bbl in SS and a MKI in blue with 6" tapered bbl.
I paid $200 for the MKI and I am sure it is a better gun overall since I have owned many Ruger MK series over the years and they have been outstanding. I know there is not a better pistol for the money.
But, the S&W has something that the Ruger doesn't. It is lighter and feels like it wants to go with you plinking. I am now on the lookout for the 4" SS and alloy 622. I think would make a great trail gun if it is reliable. It seems like it is going to make a great informal plinker.
I just don't hear much about the 422 or 622. As I get older, I am gravitating towadrs owning more and more S&Ws. I am not trying to buy them but those are the guns I end up with.