5906 vs 6906 grips/trigger reach

scwv67

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
961
Reaction score
350
Location
SW Ohio
Is the only difference between them being that the height of the 6906 is less due to the different capacity?

I really like my 5906, but with the curved backstrap Delrin's, the DA trigger reach is a bit long in my "girly" hands. It's not too much, and since it's a range pistol, I don't care.

However, I have to have perfect grip for the trigger to be reached comfortably in the DA mode. If I don't, the tip of my trigger finger can almost slip off during initial take-up in DA mode.

I ask because I've considered picking up a 6906 as an alternate carry piece to my 3913. However, I really wouldn't want to CCW it if I had to have a perfect hold like my 5906.
 
Register to hide this ad
David.....if you want to try a 6906 live fire you can try mine...that way you know for sure....and....I know a guy here local that had some LEO trade in 6906:D......the only thing it has the chunky Hogue rubber grips that fit my sasquatch hands but I can put the stocks back on it for a test drive
 
Last edited:
David.....if you want to try a 6906 live fire you can try mine...that way you know for sure....and....I know a guy here local that had some LEO trade in 6906:D

Hmmm...:)

I will say I handled a 659 today that had some chunky aftermarket grips that were definitely wider than my 5906, yet it seemed the trigger reach was actually a bit shorter.

Perhaps there are more differences between the dimensions of the 2nd Gens and 3rd Gens than I thought.
 
I'd bet the 5906/6906 are going to be the same because there is no straight grip option on the 6906 and no aftermarket support besides the freakishly large Houge.

The 5906 has had the great Uncle Mike's grips plus Pachmayr did/does make a grip.
 
I feel the same way with reaching the trigger in my stock gripped 6906, I wear a large glove and sometimes an XL so I would not say my hands are small but I think the double stack makes it a little beefy and the trigger a little hard to reach, not terrible but I would love it to be an 1/8 or 1/4 inch closer to the middle of my finger print area.
 
Last edited:
The 6906 trigger does sit pretty far forward.

If you are not opposed to DAO, give the 6946 a try. Because the design is partially cocked, the trigger sits farther back. For me, my finger sits perfectly on it now.

Since its also partially cocked, the pull is lighter in DA than the 6906. I REAAAAAALY like this gun. :D
 
If you are not opposed to DAO, give the 6946 a try. Because the design is partially cocked, the trigger sits farther back. For me, my finger sits perfectly on it now.



I agree (and as the current owner of a 6946 and past owner of about six other DAO 3rd gens, I should have thought of it too).
 
I have a 6906 and the one thing about it I wish I could change is the curved grip. I much prefer the straight grip. The hogue grips for the 3913 and 5906 are thin panels, but the ones for the 6906 are monstrously fat wrap around rubber so I left the curved ones on
 
I have a 6906 and the one thing about it I wish I could change is the curved grip. I much prefer the straight grip. The hogue grips for the 3913 and 5906 are thin panels, but the ones for the 6906 are monstrously fat wrap around rubber so I left the curved ones on


It's my understanding there was a straight grip for the 4013, and that it will fit a 6906. Perhaps others more knowledgeable can confirm or correct me.
 
It's my understanding there was a straight grip for the 4013, and that it will fit a 6906. Perhaps others more knowledgeable can confirm or correct me.


The 4013 (single stack/straight grip) is built on the 4516 size frame and is not compatible.


The 4013TSW (double stack/curved grip) is built on the 6906 frame size and is compatible.
 
The hogue grips for the 3913 and 5906 are thin panels, but the ones for the 6906 are monstrously fat wrap around rubber so I left the curved ones on



I've thought of modding a set since they are dirt cheap.

Chop off the front first, maybe thin them down after.
 
Is the only difference between them being that the height of the 6906 is less due to the different capacity?

I really like my 5906, but with the curved backstrap Delrin's, the DA trigger reach is a bit long in my "girly" hands. It's not too much, and since it's a range pistol, I don't care.

However, I have to have perfect grip for the trigger to be reached comfortably in the DA mode. If I don't, the tip of my trigger finger can almost slip off during initial take-up in DA mode.

I ask because I've considered picking up a 6906 as an alternate carry piece to my 3913. However, I really wouldn't want to CCW it if I had to have a perfect hold like my 5906.

I do believe that there were some straight back- strap grips made also. Bob
 
New guy with short fingers here.

Just picked up a 5906 today that needs new grips (significant chunks missing - must have been carried by a K-9 handler).

I've read that the Hogue grips are bigger around (girth) than the stock S&W grips, and the Pachmayrs are in between - correct?

Where do the Uncle Mike's grips fall on the skinny-fat continuum?

Thanks in advance,
M D 'Doc' Nugent
 
Where do the Uncle Mike's grips fall on the skinny-fat continuum?



They are slim and nice. I have two sets just in case I end up with another 5900/4000 series gun.


A friend had an issued 5906 that came with Hogues. I took them off and popped on a set of Uncle MIke's I picked up cheap on ebay and he was very happy with the slimmer profile.


Then his PD turned them all in for new Glock 22s three weeks later without me having the chance to switch the grips back :rolleyes:
 
The gist of the above seems to be a straight-up comparison between the 5906 and 6906 and 3913, with a 6946 and another here and there thrown in for good measure.

Well, my head started spinning shortly after the 6946's introduction to the discussion, so I'll have take a bye on the the rest.

Not desirous of a Pulitzer at this moment, I'm including herein three just-taken, somewhat-rushed shots having visual (not scientific) comparisons between Smith & Wesson Models 5906 (TSW, in this case, but which is pretty much just a 5906); a 6906; a 3913; aa 3913NL; and, a 6946.

dcw-albums-chopping-block-other-reasons-picture12417-quadrants-clockwise-beginning-2-p-m-wherein-model-5906-4-p-m-model-6906-8-p-m-model-3913nl-model-6946.jpg


In the above is found the 5906 at 2 p.m.; immediately below in the 4 p.m. slot is the 6906; to it's left in the 8 p.m. quadrant is a 3913NL and above it, a Model 6946.

dcw-albums-chopping-block-other-reasons-picture12418-quadrants-clockwise-beginning-2-p-m-wherein-model-5906-4-p-m-model-6906-8-p-m-model-3913-model-3913nl.jpg


The only difference between the preceding picture and the image immediately above is the absence of the 6946, the 3913NL has been moved upward to the 10 p.m. quadrant, replaced by a Model 3913 below in the 8 p.m. slot.

dcw-albums-chopping-block-other-reasons-picture12419-quadrants-clockwise-beginning-2-p-m-wherein-model-5906-4-p-m-model-6906-8-p-m-model-3913-model-6946.jpg


Lastly is the above arrangement, again including the M5906; an M6906 immediately below in the 4 p.m. quadrant; an M3913 at 8 p.m. and, the M6946.

The M5906 is a big gun for a 9 mm. That's just all there is to it, especially when compared to the double (offset) stacked M6906, which is among my two favorite carry guns and with which I regularly practice.

Other than a few things in common like being manufactured by S&W, each having a 9 mm Parabellum cartridge chamber and other sundry aspects, they start departing rather quickly, especially in size and dimensions. They are not the same gun; having only a one-digit difference in nomenclature. I might be mistaken (it's happened before) but I got the impression someone in here believed the 5906 and 6906 are essentially the same.

The 6906 evolved from the 669; the latter in-turn evolving from the 469 "Mini." There was no "569," excepting one-time manufacturer's suggested retail price for the M&P9; the M&P9 Compact; the M&P40 and the M&P40 Compact.

My 6906 is pictured with a wrap-a-round Hogue Grip, which was a factory option. This gun was delivered with the Hogue grip, but which was found by its initial owner as too bulky - an aspect that one can discern in looking at the images above. Personally, I find the grip quite comfortable even though my fingers don't fully wrap, as do they with any of my 3913s, including an unpictured LadySmith that has no measurable difference in its grip and that of the other 3913 models.

The 5906 is the all-stainless steel variation of the blued carbon slide & frame model 5904, which in turn, turn, turn is a variation of the stainless steel slide and alloy frame 5903.

(Please let me know when the excitement is too great and I'll chill for awhile. We don't need any heart attacks around here.)

I like the 6906 and, especially, the 669 for their respective mid-gun balance points. Both feel good in my hand, as though they're mated to my fingers and palm. Both, much like my 3913s, are highly accurate straight off the factory line.

Change from the 669's Hogue grip to a very different and definitely thin hard-plastic grip offered as original equipment, too, and you have a feel not too far removed from the single-column 3913.

One shouldn't really need to extol the virtue of a shooter wanting a familiar feel in his hand, regardless of model preferences.

Dimensionally the 6946 is larger gun than the 669/6906 but still a tick or two smaller than the 5906. Aesthetically I like it's backstrap curve and its feel in my hand. Similar to the Model 6944 - which has a aluminum alloy frame and blue-steel slide - the 6946 has a stainless steel slide and semi-bobbed hammer.

I had the 5906TSW mainly for competitive target shooting but no longer play those gigs, so it's largely become a safe queen, although I do drive it around the block every now and again - if nothing else but because the trigger pull is very sweet. And I do mean sweet.

Now, time for World's Dumbest.
 
Now, time for World's Dumbest.

sorry....thought that was my cue to post:p..........nice comparison pics but can't really show subtle difference in finger reach for placement on trigger.....except on the 6946 compared to the 6906 and 3913 looks almost half the distance to the rear of the guard .....don't see many 5906TSW...very nice;)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top