640 Pro Series

Tracer_Bullet

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
634
Reaction score
204
Location
SE Michigan
Since my eyes are starting to go bad and I am starting to have a difficult time seeing the tiny sights of my trusty 49, I was pleasantly surprised to find a shiny new 640 Pro Series at one of the local shops. Of course, I made the mistake of asking to look at it and the next thing I knew it was following me home... Doing the paperwork for it just seems like kind of a blur... :)

DSC00022.jpg

I got it to the range today, and thought some of you might like a brief review/range report, since there don't seem to be many of these guns out there yet:
The sights are easy for me to see and are tritium 3-dots. The rear sight dots look larger than the front due to having white dots around the tritium vials while the front sight does not. The sights are bright and easy to pick up in dim light.
Fit and function are excellent, the finish has a brushed look to it which is just fine for a working gun, IMO. There is no internal lock on this gun, which is the way I like 'em (not a shot at those who have and like the lock, just my preference). I'm not sure that the fluted barrel actually serves much purpose, other than to look cool, though I suppose the increased surface area might help with cooling and may save a fraction of an ounce in weight.
Speaking of weight, this gun weighs in at 23 ounces, so it's definitely not a feather-weight unobtanium pocket gun. I have always carried steel snubbies in my jeans pockets, so it's not an issue for me, but I could see it making the pockets of dressier pants sag.
The stock grips seem a bit skinny for my hands, but were otherwise comfortable. I swapped them out for the rosewood grips after returning from the range. These are the grips I normally have on my other snubbies, and I kind of wish that I had put them on the gun prior to the range trip as I may have shot better with what I am used to.
The cylinder is also cut for moon clips, and the gun comes with three. They are very easy to bend if you aren't careful, and don't seem very sturdy to me, though this is my first experience with them. I don't see myself carrying a loaded moon clip in my pocket for fear of bending it, but I like that all of the empties are ejected in one package so that I don't have to worry about any casings being partially ejected. The gun will be carried with a moon clip in place so that the first cylinder full of empties is guaranteed to all come out with one whack to the ejector.
The trigger is the smoothest I have had in a new j-frame right out of the box. I find it comparable to my 40 year old model 60 that has had thousands of rounds through it. Trigger pull weight seems comparable to my other J-frames, but I don't have a scale for a true comparison.
As for the shooting, the gun functioned flawlessly and grouped well when the shooter did his part. I found Remington Golden Saber 125gr "magnums" to hit about 2.5" low at 7 yards. 135gr WWB FMJ was closer to point of aim at about 1.5" low, and Remington 158gr LSWCHPs and my 158gr SWC reloads went right about where the front sight dot was on the target.

These targets were shot with the Remington 158grs and my reloads, respectively, offhand at 7 yards. Not bad for the first time out, and good enough for a close encounter in my book.

DSC00023.jpg DSC00024.jpg

Overall, I'm very happy with the gun. It cost me about $200 more than a standard 640, but I'm sure that getting a trigger job, having a cylinder cut for moon clips, and getting 3-dot night sights installed on a standard 640 would run more than that.
Although I love my old 49, I think I am going to be retiring it and carrying the 640 Pro instead.
As a kind of an odd side-note, the model number stamped on the frame (under the yoke) is 640-1, not the -3 I was expecting.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00025.jpg
    DSC00025.jpg
    45.3 KB · Views: 1,193
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Any quality problems like canted barrel, rough crown, etc?
 
I have never seen or heard of this version, what a great find and thanks for writing it up. Boy would I love it if it was possible to put a set of Novak's like that on my 642.
 
That is awsome. I am still waiting to see one here in NC..I tried to special order one but was told that it was not available yet by 4 different distributors.
Congrats on the 640 pro...I cant wait to get one myself...
 
Any quality problems like canted barrel, rough crown, etc?

I was aware of the canted barrel complaints lately so I checked that carefully before purchasing and can detect no cant, the crown is smooth. The only thing I can see appears to be cosmetic; when the cylinder is closed there is a slight gap between the yoke and the frame, under the ejector housing/barrel underlug, just wide enough to slide an index card into. I can't press the gap closed and it takes a little bit of force pressing on the cylinder to widen it any. Not something that worries me, it just isn't present on my old 49 or model 10s, though my 60 no-dash and 686 no-dash have similar gaps.

DSC00026.jpg

Thank you to the other responders for your compliments
 
Last edited:
TK carries additional Hi Quality moon clips at 10/$60. I believe TK makes them for S&W.
They also carry the California Competition Moon Clip Carrier for the 5 shot J Frame at $20 a pop. I have 2 and they make carrying spare moon clips on the belt for fast reloading a snap. The moon clip carrier for the J Frame was a much needed item. The spring steel CCW units are thin and carry great on the belt. I have been using them for years with my 625, 610, and 310NG revolvers.
They also have a pocket moon clip holder at $30 a pop. Basicly it is a round device that goes over the bullet end of the moon clipped ammo and keeps the shells in the clip and keeps the clips from getting bent when pocket carrying the moon clips. If you plan to pocket carry 38 Special moon clips you probably need a couple of these.

The .025 thick factory moon clips work best with Remington, Speer, Mag Tech, and Federal cases. No Winchesters due to the under cut size. Probably a good plan to get a Delux Moon Clip Tool so you do not bend the moon clips loading and unloading them.
Deluxe Moon Clip Tool
You will need the .380 Arbor size with the 5 shot J Frame 38.
With that said, I have a 442 Pro Moon Clip, and I can finger load it with most ammo that I am using for concealed carry. (Mag Tech, Speer 135 Short Barrel, and Remington 125 Golden Sabers) I still use a tool to take the brass out of the clips. I am very impressed with the TK moon clips.

You have a great carry handgun with the 640 Pro. Last week a couple were listed on Gun Broker, so you can find one if you look a little.

Great Report by the way.

Enjoy

Bob
 
Last edited:
I recently bought one of the 640 Pros. I have never really been a big fan of J frames, prefering the larger frames. That said, everyone needs a J frame pocket pistol . . . . ., and I think with the 640 Pro S&W came up with the perfect J frame.

It won't be perfect for everyone due to it's weight, but the proportions, and sights are just perfect for me. The moon clip ability I think is a big plus too. Not really necessary, but nice to have. Another Plus that really isn't needed, but nice to have is it's appearance. The fluted barrel, I think, really adds to it's cool factor. I am glad that S&W left off the IL too!!

The 640 Pro is a bit on the pricy side compared to other Smith J frames, but I think it is worth the extra. If I need something light I have a couple of Smith's lightweights, but I think that the Pro will be used the most.

No canted barrel, or other problems with the gun. The only thing is that the rear sight is canted over to the left a tad, and that problem appears to be in the sight itself.

I am really glad that I got one.

Best Wishes,
Tom
 
Last edited:
Here's mine and my experience mirrors your report. Best J Frame ever made!
640Pro.jpg
 
Tracer bullet, good report. Thanks for posting it.

It seems odd to me that S&W would put white rings around the rear sight tritium vials but not around the front sight vial. Probably most common are rings around vials on both front and rear sights, and putting a ring around only the vial on the front sight is available from some sight makers, but I've never heard of rings around the rear vials but not the front one. This would actually draw the shooter's focus toward the rear sight and away from the front sight, running counter to accepted best practice of focusing more attention on the front sight rather than the rear sight. Is it possible that there is supposed to be a white ring around the vial on the front sight as well, and it was never put on during manufacture? Some sight makers use white paint for these rings and others IIRC use a plastic/polymer/nylon ring glued into place.
 
Thanks for the info. I've been wondering how these shoot. I like the idea of the night sights that can be drifted for windage. This is a good feature as most revolvers hit left for me, so I usually need to adjust the rear sight. Nice looking 640!
 
I have the 632 Pro - the same basic revolver except it is a .327 Federal Magnum 6-shooter.

007.jpg


I complained about mine hitting low here - then I was told it uses a 'combat' front sight image, ie, the front orb centered between the rear orbs and superimposed over the bullseye, not my usual 6 o'clock sighting. It hits coincident POI/POA from 7-12yd with 115gr Gold Dots - a bit low with milder 85gr/100gr SJHP's and ~2" low with my 94gr LRNFP .32 S&WL plinkers. Very pleased with it now - and the 60 Pro grips help. Still, those 115gr Gold Dots - at over 1300 fps - give you a snap!

Neat series - I have the 627 Pro and 60 Pro, too... keepers! I may have to look for a 640 Pro now...

Try the 'combat' sighting re those low hits - and congrats!

Stainz
 
I like that 640 Pro, geez another gun to get :rolleyes:. No IL makes it enticing for me, not looking to start a fight, just prefer no-locks in my carry guns. I am looking for a 627UDR, lock and all. The MIM doesn't bother me in the least, my MIM guns have better triggers than most of my others, except the pre-war guns.
 
oldtexan: I don't think the front sight is quite wide enough to put a white ring around the vial. It did take a little getting used to, because, as you say, the larger sight dots tend to draw your eye to them.

Stainz: The shop had a 632Pro also, which I like because of the 6th shot, but I didn't want to get into another caliber and just stuck with the .357. I did eventually figure out to use the combat sight image, which is why the target I shot with the Rem 158s has the group more centered than the one with my reloads. Unfortunately, I was out of range ammo and Golden Sabers by that point, so I'll have to try them again next time I get to the range. :o BTW: Love those grips you have on your 632. I tried them on a 60Pro and they felt great in the hand.
 
The 640 is not a bad value when you consider a $100 Moon Clip Conversion price to have one done.
Comes with 2 of the TK moon clips $12.
Then we have factory Tritium Night Sights, well worth another $100 .
Then the front sight is Drift Adjustable to fine tune the windage if needed.

Then the Cool Looking barrel for free.

Smith & Wesson is getting it right.

I just wish my 442 Pro Moon Clip had a changeable Tritium Front Sight. That would about make it perfect for concealed carry.

Bob
 
Pro Series?

Do these come with a trigger job? What all is included in the 640 Pro Series that one cannot see with the eye?
 
Back
Top