About fed up with BG 380

Not sure what you are trying to say and imply...
Maybe you flunked basic grammar in elementary school?
I read all my operator manuals; I'm a former record-holding competitive shooter and firearms instructor; have owned more guns of all types than you could imagine; and, I'm not Jerry Miculek nor do you have to be to recognize a crappy gun design. A crappy gun is still a crappy gun no matter whose hands it's in. Just because a few Bodyguards may function properly doesn't mean it's everybody's cup of tea. Keep drinking the S&W Kool Aid and posting insulting assumptions about other forum members... Good Job!
Have a nice day.

Well, in the alternative, not everybody shoots every pistol well. There are times when a perfectly fine pistol design just doesn't fit the way we hold it, handle it, point it, shoot it, or reload. That's why there's so many different designs.

PS: Isn't "Maybe you flunked basic grammar in elementary school?" an insulting assumption about another forum member? Leave that stuff out of the discussion . . .
 
I think you will like the LCP II if you give it a try. I have an original LCP & it is OK, 100% reliable. I have over 500 rounds theough my new LCP II it is also 100% reliable, it is the pocket pistol I have looked for.

Not to venture too far off topic here - but, are you comfortable with the safety in the design of the LCP II? Up front, I don't own one and haven't fired one – but the trigger seems like a cocked SA to me. My LCP seems just right - much better trigger pull than my old BG .380 and I can clearly see the hammer being pushed back some distance as part of the trigger pull.
 
I have a suspicion that a new bodyguard Will debut this week with the already leaked shield 2.0. They could rename it the shield 380 maybe just keep the same name.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
 
I got the BG .380 Feb. 2014 and it was flawless for over 800 rounds of FMJ & HP, then light strikes all of a sudden. The one good one was my Gen 2 LCP that I gave that to my son in law. I just trust a J frame more than any of the tiny sub compact guns and now carry a 340PD.
 
Are we talking about the BG380 with the laser or the M&P380 without the laser. I've got the M&P and I bought it over the Ruger because it was hammer fired allowing for repeat strike and had a safety. I shoot nothing but ball through mine and it has worked as intended for over 200 rounds. I like the Ruger but not having a safety for pocket carry is a no go for me and that is how I carry these. In the pocket-no holster no nothing.
 
Not to venture too far off topic here - but, are you comfortable with the safety in the design of the LCP II? Up front, I don't own one and haven't fired one – but the trigger seems like a cocked SA to me. My LCP seems just right - much better trigger pull than my old BG .380 and I can clearly see the hammer being pushed back some distance as part of the trigger pull.
It is a 6 lb trigger your LCP is 8 lb the biggest difference is the LCP has a long 8 lb pull while the LCP II a light take up to a crisp 6 lb pull. The LCP is just right for some people. To me the trigger in the LCP II feels like my M&P9c.
I have no concerns about carrying my LCP II in the pocket holster that came with it.
 
My wife had a BG for about a month. Biggest problem was trigger pull. Pull the trigger on Friday and it fires on Sat. First S&W we didn't like, or keep!
 
I have had a good experience with mine so far. I mean yes trigger pull is forever but I'm able to keep all 6 shots within the circles of a 8" target at 10 yrds. While shooting at a pretty good pace as the range will allow. I think it's just a practice issue. My only regret is that stupid laser, worthless imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I have had a good experience with mine so far. I mean yes trigger pull is forever but I'm able to keep all 6 shots within the circles of a 8" target at 10 yrds. While shooting at a pretty good pace as the range will allow. I think it's just a practice issue. My only regret is that stupid laser, worthless imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I agree. I think people expect a small pistol like that to handle like a full size weapon. It functions exactly as it was designed... just takes practice.
I don't have the laser version. I think that is useless too on a gun that is really a point and shoot defense weapon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I agree. I think people expect a small pistol like that to handle like a full size weapon. It functions exactly as it was designed... just takes practice.
I don't have the laser version. I think that is useless too on a gun that is really a point and shoot defense weapon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I did not expect to find a pocket pistol that functions as much like my M&P9c as I did after having a LCP for many years & shooting an older & newer BG, but this LCP II is close, I think real close.
 
Last edited:
No problems

I can hit anything up to 400yards with the bodyguard. Never a problem. jerry
 

Attachments

  • jerry miculek.jpg
    jerry miculek.jpg
    120.2 KB · Views: 36
  • jerry miceluk 2.jpg
    jerry miceluk 2.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 36
About fed up with BG 380 I really don't want to get into a long term exchange with S&W about it-sending it back and forth. I really DO like this little pistol, but what isn't right here?:(

It isn't a Glock 42, that's what.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
I've carried my M&P 380 off/on for the past 2 years, never had a problem with it. Fired over 1k rounds thru it. mine has been 100% reliable with carry ammo such as Sig Elite, hydra shoks or critical defense. As far as range ammo, you have to find which brand ammo has the softer primers. the M&P380 doesn't like hard primers such as S&B, Monarch or PPU, that's where you run into light strike problems on these little guys....
 
I've carried my M&P 380 off/on for the past 2 years, never had a problem with it. Fired over 1k rounds thru it. mine has been 100% reliable with carry ammo such as Sig Elite, hydra shoks or critical defense. As far as range ammo, you have to find which brand ammo has the softer primers. the M&P380 doesn't like hard primers such as S&B, Monarch or PPU, that's where you run into light strike problems on these little guys....

YEP. After test firing several brands with my BG, which I purchased last year, I found that the Hornady American Gunner is what the little pistol likes. Nearly 800 rounds and 100% reliability later, I love the BG. BTW, my previous .380s were a Kahr ( I sold 'cause the trigger guard would beat up my finger), and a Ruger ( I traded on the BG); they too needed ammo they liked. :)
 
I've never heard anyone sing praises to the BG380.

And that is sad in my view.It puts a big ole mark in the S & W name. I own the original in 380 pocket. The Kel Tec. ( 2008) mine has thousands threw it been very reliable. Smith has had plenty of time in my view to fix there issue with their 380. Others have I M H O.
 
Last edited:
I sold mine NIB, after dry firing it once. I bought a great Ruger Custom LCP. I hate to say I told you so, so I won't. In my opinion the BG is not a well made, or well designed pistol.
 
YEP. After test firing several brands with my BG, which I purchased last year, I found that the Hornady American Gunner is what the little pistol likes.

Coming to think of it, I don't recall having any problems with Hornady American Gunner in any of my pistols.
 
Last edited:
While I'm a S&W guy , the LCP Custom is what you seek!
I shoot a Bersa Thunder .380. One thing most .380's I see do not like the winchester flat nose round. My BT.380 will shoot anything but that round. It shoots the freedom flat nose no problem
 
Back
Top