Accuracy is coming: Apex M&P Barrels

Accuracy...

I'd like to see a before and after the Apex barrel install comparison at 25 and 50 yards with the same ammo. I usually don't try to judge accuracy inside of 25 yards with handguns. Anyone done such a thing yet?
 
Here is the link to my previous post in this thread. There are a number of people in this thread reporting results.

Quick update.

I ordered and fitted an Apex SDI barrel into my M&P9 4.25" Performance Center. Here are the results. I shot from 20 yards (max distance at my range). I didn't have sandbags so I braced my wrists on my soft range bag which was not a proper rest but was as close to a reasonable approximation as I could put to use. Same ammo, same day, same gun, same distance -- different barrel. I shot a few different types of ammo during this session and the results were similar across the board.

Factory OEM barrel:
Glorious ~10" spread!

Best OEM group of the day


Apex Tactical Barrel:




I don't work for Apex. I don't have friends that work at Apex. I didn't receive this barrel for free. Nothing shady is going on here. YMMV.

So all those S&W apologists who immediately jump to blaming the shooter despite whatever evidence is presented to the contrary can put that in their pipes and smoke it. Practice is no doubt going to make someone a better shooter. However, I can practice flapping my arms all day and all night; but no amount of practice will make me ever take flight. Just how widespread the problem is would be anyone's guess, but based on the years of complaints I doubt I'm the only one that has a genuine issue.
 
What kind of accuracy are people expecting to get out of the factory barrels? My 9FS was test fired in March of 2011, has the "5RH" barrel and I always score well in USPSA, IDPA. I regularly put 3 rounds withing 2-3" on a 10" steel plate at 15 yards with my 124gr LRN reloads.

This pistol was not made for Bullseye competitions.
 
What kind of accuracy are people expecting to get out of the factory barrels? My 9FS was test fired in March of 2011, has the "5RH" barrel and I always score well in USPSA, IDPA. I regularly put 3 rounds withing 2-3" on a 10" steel plate at 15 yards with my 124gr LRN reloads.

This pistol was not made for Bullseye competitions.

3" at 15 yards is better than I was getting from a benchrest. You can see from the pictures above what I was getting. The "after" pics should be proof enough that it was the gun and not me.
 
I'm ready, when they offer a 4.25" threaded barrel, after getting settled in to their new facilities, I will order one.
 
The semi-fit barrel is very easy to install

If you are on the fence about getting an Apex barrel, I can report that is quite easy to install. Watch Randy's YouTube video and get the Dykem and proper file. He explains it very clearly. Take your time and you will have no problem. Go slowly with the file and keep it parallel as he demonstrates.
 
Here is the results of testing the stock barrel, Storm Lake SS treaded barrel, and the Apex shot off a rest at 20yds. 5 five shot groups. i have some problem with the 4x Simmons scope shifting its settings on the Apex test which was the last of the three test.

Stock barrel
------------------------Worst group Best Group Avg group
Best 4 of 5 shots--------4.458----------1.391-------3.068"
5 of 5 shots--------------5.818----------3.126-------4.579

Storm Lake Barrel
Best of 4 shots-----------2.348---------1.138--------1.556
5 of 5 shots---------------2.993---------1.611--------2.258

Apex semi fitted
Best 4 of 5 shots---------2.145----------1.239--------2.145
5 of 5 shots--------------3.587-----------1.439--------2.229

These were shot with 115gr plated HP X Treme bullets and 5.8gr CFE Pistol. Where I really noticed the difference was the Apex barrel didn't throw flyers the shot that opened the group up was caused by me. The factory barrel would throw two flyers that were way out of the group. I knew these results would be this way before I ran the test the factory barrel's fit is loose and my fit on the Apex is real tight.

yes this is not a target pistol but it is way better now then before and would cut down on misses shooting IDPA od IPSA.

Sorry I got these rows to line up the only way I could figure out how.
 
Last edited:
I have been shooting IDPA and USPSA for 20 years. If 1" to 2" makes the difference between you hitting and missing the target, you need practice, not a new barrel. Wow, a lot of practice.

People get so wrapped up in buying Band-Aids to make up for poor shooting when all they need is extra ammo and practice. I often see new shooters who bought a Glock or M&P then add $400 in "upgrades" and still could not manage to shoot their own foot if they tried. Then I have to listen to them blame the gun for their misses.
 
Last edited:
I have been shooting IDPA and USPSA for 20 years. If 1" to 2" makes the difference between you hitting and missing the target, you need practice, not a new barrel. Wow, a lot of practice.

People get so wrapped up in buying Band-Aids to make up for poor shooting when all they need is extra ammo and practice. I often see new shooters who bought a Glock or M&P then add $400 in "upgrades" and still could not manage to shoot their own foot if they tried. Then I have to listen to them blame the gun for their misses.

Did you see the pics I posted above? For some of us, the difference was a LOT more than 1 or 2 inches.
 
Everyone is talking about the 9mm pistols. Are the .40 pistols suffering from the same accuracy problems? I would think a good aftermarket barrel will increase the accuracy of any M&P pistol. Are there any plans to come out with an Apex M&P CORE 40L barrel?
 
I started shooting USPSA in 1988, my L6XX membership number gives some idea of the time frame. I was a mighty poor "B" class shooter back then but you are missing the point TacticalReload is trying to make. This is not a random few 9MMs shooting poor, there is a trend of this. Yes some/most people need to practice more, a lot more, but my Shield is nearly as accurate as my 4.25" CORE. Mine shoots like ****, but I need more practice too. I hate that my CORE needs a barrel or trigger but that is the case.
 
Everyone is talking about the 9mm pistols. Are the .40 pistols suffering from the same accuracy problems? I would think a good aftermarket barrel will increase the accuracy of any M&P pistol. Are there any plans to come out with an Apex M&P CORE 40L barrel?

I had an M&P40, as well, that had no accuracy issues.
 
I have been shooting IDPA and USPSA for 20 years. If 1" to 2" makes the difference between you hitting and missing the target, you need practice, not a new barrel. Wow, a lot of practice.

People get so wrapped up in buying Band-Aids to make up for poor shooting when all they need is extra ammo and practice. I often see new shooters who bought a Glock or M&P then add $400 in "upgrades" and still could not manage to shoot their own foot if they tried. Then I have to listen to them blame the gun for their misses.

Agreed if you are just shooting IDPA then any thing that will shoot a 8" group is find. Lets look at it in a different way. Lets say you hurry the shot and you aim 3" the the right of center on a longer shot your 3" groups is going to put you one down. A tighter grouping would have kept you zero down. I always go for the best I can do no matter what I do. I have shot IDPA and shoot it petty well except I am old a slow and tend to aim to much. I can shoot the lowest points down in a match but the slowest time posted. So I will stick to benchrest pistol and some BE
 
Spoke to smith and wesson

So, after a comple series of reloads with 115, 124 and 147 gr bullets in several different powder levels from minimum to near max, the best the gun could shoot was just under 2" at 7 yards off hand. So worried it was me I reloaded again and went to a bench and shot a series of ten rounds of each load for a total of 200 rounds. The best average group I was able to get was just over 2.5 inches with the 115gr. bullets and 5.8 gr, of power pistol with a .001 crimp.

Very bothered by this and now at this point sure it's not me but the gun I called Smith and Wesson today. Their response was for that gun (new version performance center ported core m and p in 9mm) the accuracy standard for the gun is 2" at 10 yards from a bench. They did not qualify how many rounds this would need to be. Many of my targets I shot would have several grouped together in either horizontal or vertical strings with one or two flyers.

So I would say my gun is proabbly within their specs, but this is just terrible., I bought the gun for competition. Which means any stage that may have longer shots I have to be absolutely perfect in my sight picture and trigger squeeze or the inherent accuracy of the gun will be misses especially if there are head shots. This means shooting much slower and masking sure the sights are perfect. Which ultimately means you will loose time!

So here is my concern/biggest issue. I purchased the gun for competition, and it's sold as a competition ready gun. Yet their own accuracy standard is less than acceptable for competitive shooting. That just does not make sense to me and I'm totally bummed about my new purchase.

I have seen people claiming that they have spoken with smith and Wesson and what they are stating is the standard was 3" at 25 yards. Which I would be ok with. Not happy but ok. However what I was told was very far from that.

Can anyone confirm that they have actually spoken with them and what they were told.

I wish Apex would come out with a ported barrel to match the slide cuts on the new ported guns so I could fix this and keep the porting.
 
Last edited:
Went to the range again today, 20 rounds at 25 yards.
I have installed every apex item available for my S&W MP 9mm Performance pro L couldn't be happier with the results and I have put almost 5,000 rounds thru it.

I do have a question for you Randy, the stock coating on the slide in some areas is down to the metal, what do you recommend for re coating the slide. I would like to have mine recoated. It still needs a little help to go into full battery but not like it was when I first installed the apex barrel. But like I said I have put almost 5,000 rounds thru it.

Thanks again!!!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    100.2 KB · Views: 116
I was using the 115g yesterday, I like using the 115g I bought for competition and at the range. the 147g I bought to try it's shoots really good at close range but at longer yards it's ok I think it might be due to the flat nose bullet where the 115g has a ball round nose.
I do use the 147g for my carry pistol because of the little more energy it has at closer range. I wish AE made the 147 in a ball round nose.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 43
I'm sure Apex will make some kind of accuracy claim. On their website they are claiming sub 2" groups at 50 yards and sub 1" groups at 25 yards. This is indeed better than what S&W says their barrels will do.
I find that very hard to believe. I'd have to see them shoot 10 shots at 50 yards. Some of the best custom 1911's won't group that well at 50 yards. It is not common for a pistol that groups 1" at 25 yards to shoot a group twice as big at 50 yards. Usually the groups at 50 yards are much bigger. Of course if Apex is just shooting 3 shots at each distance, it is possible to get those shots to group that small once in a while.
 
I find that very hard to believe. I'd have to see them shoot 10 shots at 50 yards. Some of the best custom 1911's won't group that well at 50 yards. It is not common for a pistol that groups 1" at 25 yards to shoot a group twice as big at 50 yards. Usually the groups at 50 yards are much bigger. Of course if Apex is just shooting 3 shots at each distance, it is possible to get those shots to group that small once in a while.

Hello,

Actually we shoot 5 shot groups from the Ransom at 25 yards and at 50 yards. We shoot 5 round groups for a couple of reasons:

The first is that of time use. Until we have our new range facility built, we have to use a public range which is only open Thursday through Sunday. Depending upon the number of shooters, the bench space and time is at a premium. The shooting periods are also only 20 minutes long, so between initial set up of the Rest, proper seating of the firearm into the mounting panels via live fire for 5 shots, the actual time we have to shoot each gun becomes very limited. Also keep in mind that like the US Modular Handgun System trials, we use slide mounted sights to align for each round fired. My eyes aren't what they used to be, so eye strain can set in pretty quickly.

The second reason is that for our purposes, a 5 shot group is still statistically relevant for our application. 10 round groups only increases ammo consumption and the probability of larger groups due to frame or fixture shifting. In CA, since we can only have 10 round magazines, anyone who knows how difficult it is to stuff that 10th round into the magazine will understand what a pain it is. Fortunately we will soon be in a free state...

We did all our initial testing at 50 yards when we were developing our barrels, using the same sighting procedures as we do for 25 yards. This was to prove that our barrels would exceed the accuracy standard set forth in the MHS trial specs (their target is a 4" circle at 50 meters). Our barrels would consistently shoot better than 2" at 50 yards. We even compared factory and other aftermarket barrels for comparison. Our best non official group was .593" at 50 yards. I say non official because the target clearly shows the 5 shot group, however there is a 6th round on the paper that we cannot account for. This group had to be thrown out because we could not determine the origin of the shot. My suspicion is that another shooter on the line hit our target. But even with that 6th round, the group opens up to 1.19" @ 50.

I decided to stop the 50 yard testing after all the data showed that with proper ammunition, our gunsmith fit barrels would consistently shoot sub 2" at fifty. The sighting for each shot at that distance increased my fatigue, plus we were constantly having to run back and forth to remove and reset fresh targets for the next test gun. It hot old pretty pretty fast.

Our best group at 25 yards measured .313" for the 5 shot group with one police officer's duty gun. Our average was realistically about 3/4" for the 5 shots @ 25.

I engineered our barrel based upon the physics of what I saw happening within the M&P design. That is why we can make the claims we do. No one thought a polymer framed striker fired pistol could go toe to toe with high end 1911s, but ours can.
 
Went to the range again today, 20 rounds at 25 yards.
I have installed every apex item available for my S&W MP 9mm Performance pro L couldn't be happier with the results and I have put almost 5,000 rounds thru it.

I do have a question for you Randy, the stock coating on the slide in some areas is down to the metal, what do you recommend for re coating the slide. I would like to have mine recoated. It still needs a little help to go into full battery but not like it was when I first installed the apex barrel. But like I said I have put almost 5,000 rounds thru it.

Thanks again!!!

That's some great shooting!

H&M metal processing has done the melonite finishing for Smith in the past and may still be. Talk to them. It may be that your slide just needs to be refreshed with metal oxide (hot dip bluing). I'm not a finishing expert so I would defer to them.
 
That's some great shooting!

H&M metal processing has done the melonite finishing for Smith in the past and may still be. Talk to them. It may be that your slide just needs to be refreshed with metal oxide (hot dip bluing). I'm not a finishing expert so I would defer to them.



Thanks!

I'll give them a call.
 
I find that very hard to believe. I'd have to see them shoot 10 shots at 50 yards. Some of the best custom 1911's won't group that well at 50 yards. It is not common for a pistol that groups 1" at 25 yards to shoot a group twice as big at 50 yards. Usually the groups at 50 yards are much bigger. Of course if Apex is just shooting 3 shots at each distance, it is possible to get those shots to group that small once in a while.


Back in March we where at the range had a few bullets left so I tried 50yards off hand (no rest or bench) I was very pleased with results (pic below @ 50yards) With more practice at that yardage I can see me getting tighter groups (around 2") it takes more accuracy on my part but from what I'm getting at 25 yards I sure can't blame the pistol.

My buddy has a high dollar 1911 he can't come close to my groups now. I'll tell him don't get frustrated just need more practice.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    197.3 KB · Views: 52
Hello,

Actually we shoot 5 shot groups from the Ransom at 25 yards and at 50 yards. We shoot 5 round groups for a couple of reasons:

The first is that of time use. Until we have our new range facility built, we have to use a public range which is only open Thursday through Sunday. Depending upon the number of shooters, the bench space and time is at a premium. The shooting periods are also only 20 minutes long, so between initial set up of the Rest, proper seating of the firearm into the mounting panels via live fire for 5 shots, the actual time we have to shoot each gun becomes very limited. Also keep in mind that like the US Modular Handgun System trials, we use slide mounted sights to align for each round fired. My eyes aren't what they used to be, so eye strain can set in pretty quickly.

The second reason is that for our purposes, a 5 shot group is still statistically relevant for our application. 10 round groups only increases ammo consumption and the probability of larger groups due to frame or fixture shifting. In CA, since we can only have 10 round magazines, anyone who knows how difficult it is to stuff that 10th round into the magazine will understand what a pain it is. Fortunately we will soon be in a free state...

We did all our initial testing at 50 yards when we were developing our barrels, using the same sighting procedures as we do for 25 yards. This was to prove that our barrels would exceed the accuracy standard set forth in the MHS trial specs (their target is a 4" circle at 50 meters). Our barrels would consistently shoot better than 2" at 50 yards. We even compared factory and other aftermarket barrels for comparison. Our best non official group was .593" at 50 yards. I say non official because the target clearly shows the 5 shot group, however there is a 6th round on the paper that we cannot account for. This group had to be thrown out because we could not determine the origin of the shot. My suspicion is that another shooter on the line hit our target. But even with that 6th round, the group opens up to 1.19" @ 50.

I decided to stop the 50 yard testing after all the data showed that with proper ammunition, our gunsmith fit barrels would consistently shoot sub 2" at fifty. The sighting for each shot at that distance increased my fatigue, plus we were constantly having to run back and forth to remove and reset fresh targets for the next test gun. It hot old pretty pretty fast.

Our best group at 25 yards measured .313" for the 5 shot group with one police officer's duty gun. Our average was realistically about 3/4" for the 5 shots @ 25.

I engineered our barrel based upon the physics of what I saw happening within the M&P design. That is why we can make the claims we do. No one thought a polymer framed striker fired pistol could go toe to toe with high end 1911s, but ours can.
Can you clarify using "slide mounted sights to align for each shot fired"? I have a little experience with the Ransom Rest and once the gun was settled into the rest, I never realigned it for each shot. I am confused. I have recently heard of some souped up Springfield Armory XD's which have shot well at 50 yards off hand, so yeah I know that plastic pistols can be made to shoot well at that distance, but I'm still skeptical about the 2" groups.
 
Last edited:
Can you clarify using "slide mounted sights to align for each shot fired"? I have a little experience with the Ransom Rest and once the gun was settled into the rest, I never realigned it for each shot. I am confused. I have recently heard of some souped up Springfield Armory XD's which have shot well at 50 yards off hand, so yeah I know that plastic pistols can be made to shoot well at that distance, but I'm still skeptical about the 2" groups.

Unfortunately, the polymer frames and urethane grip adapters allow for slippage which is why you don't see a lot of positive accuracy results from the Ransom with poly guns. Steel framed 1911s don't suffer from the same effects. I have been mounting a Trijicon RMR sight for most of my testing now because of the eye strain. What it showed me was that any external force on the frame can affect the alignment of the gun relative to the target- including the trigger actuating attachment on the Ransom. That is why for each shot I use the optic to align the gun on the test target. This is also the way the shooter is going to use the pistol anyway.

The fact is that no one thought that a polymer framed, striker fired pistol with service tolerances could even approach the mechanical accuracy of a custom 1911, yet we have data that proves otherwise.

I invite skepticism and in many ways I am a skeptic as well. But I also know from testing that sub 2" groups are possible.
 

Attachments

  • Mk 2 test target 4_3_15 Guardian Gold ammo.jpg
    Mk 2 test target 4_3_15 Guardian Gold ammo.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 97
Can you clarify using "slide mounted sights to align for each shot fired"? I have a little experience with the Ransom Rest and once the gun was settled into the rest, I never realigned it for each shot. I am confused. I have recently heard of some souped up Springfield Armory XD's which have shot well at 50 yards off hand, so yeah I know that plastic pistols can be made to shoot well at that distance, but I'm still skeptical about the 2" groups.

From what I've seen, XD's are hardly the most accurate pistols (quite the contrary). I wonder what modifications were done to make it accurate at those distances.
 
Ported apex barrel???

Randy,

Appriciate you contributing to this thread. I want an apex barrel bad. Just want one that will have ports to match the holes in the slide. Do you guys have plans to make one that will have porting to match the holes in the slides of factory ported guns?
 
I'm not skeptical at all.

Randy is a real genius with firearms function issues.
The Glock "brass to face" fiasco when the Gen4 came out
was cured with his FRE extractors.

I'm sending Apex my M&P 9 for a gunsmith fit barrel.

Watch the video and see the science behind the design
There's a lot to it.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKz9QarKa80[/ame]
 
From what I've seen, XD's are hardly the most accurate pistols (quite the contrary). I wonder what modifications were done to make it accurate at those distances.
The modifications were quite extensive from what I gather. The son of the poster here shot a bullseye target at 50 yards, one-handed, with a much modified XD and scored a 99 out of 100. The 10 ring is just over 3". Here is a quote from the AMU (Army Marksmanship Unit) shooter's father: "Being my son is Adam Sokolowski I know quite a bit about his XDM. His private XDM was purchased from the custom shop. The other is AMU issue but not much was done to it. Barrel was welded and fitted and trigger job done but I understand it's easy to do.
Last year all of the AMU shooters were shooting the Beretta. The 2 times he won the NTI it was done with the Betetta. This year he won 3 XD's at Perry.
I'm told by shooters at the club that drop in barrel, trigger and sights are available that will make the gun shoot as good as the one Adam is shooting." Springfield Armory has been a long time supporter of the shooting sports and especially the National Matches, while S&W has long since withdrawn their support from Camp Perry. BTW, I have never owned an XD nor S&W M&P and have no connections whatsoever with either company.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top