NO manual safety . Wake up and check S&W's site . Looks like a thumb safety to me !?Actually I was responding to the post that complained of no manual safety. The comment on the modern S&W shield was just a rant on modern firearms and how unsafe I think some are. My Model 41 and 39-2 are wonderful well made firearms. The Shield is a bad joke by comparison, but that's just how they make guns today.
I was born in Calif and lived here my whole life except when I was drafted and saw Colorado and Vietnam on Uncle's dime. It is a third world dump now filled with people who don't read, don't know history, and generally don't care, having never seen what a free country was like. I'm 78 now and too old to move.
They do show a SKU (13347) with a manual safety but so far I have seen mostly the NTS (13348) version available.
Since it is a hammer fired, single action; I'm waiting for the TS version
The Shield is a bad joke by comparison, but that's just how they make guns today.
What do you mean by "a normal barrel"???
Looks like the barrel (I see rifling) protrudes from the slide and comes out to the end of the threaded cap.
![]()
Given the interesting barrel design and fire control mechanism, wondering if a compact model is out of the question or if that might be a possibility in the future?
It would be possible, but having an even shorter barrel is probably not very desirable for this caliber. You'd get even more flash and bang while losing even more performance. I think that's the reason for all the existing 5.7x28 handguns having longer barrels. (FN=4.8", Ruger=5", PSA=4.7"/5.2", S&W=5")