Break in round count for revolver EDC

New gun....field strip, clean and oil, then fire a box to break it in.

Next go weekly to the range to become proficient. Twice a month at the very least.

In the interim, dry fire at the TV twice a week.

If you intend to carry you need to put in the time or maybe you should think about it.
 
For a 442/642 five rounds is all you need. Same for a Glock.

For 1911’s, no less than 1000 break in rounds.
 
I can't see any break in needed. Shoot it a cylinder or two to make sure it goes "bang" then you're good to go.
 
I agree with at least 200 rounds with no malfunctions with a semi auto including at least 100 rounds with your carry ammo.

But for a revolver the major threats are:

- light strikes and hard primers;

- sticky ejection (particularly with small frame revolvers and revolvers with short ejection rods);

- insufficient crimp allowing the bullet to back out of the cylinder and jam the cylinder in the frame.


Three or four cylinders is plenty to confirm reliability of the hammer and primer combination as well as discover any ejection issues.

If you also take a couple rounds and load and reload the, so they both experience the recoil of about 10 rounds and measure or compare to ensure they didn’t grow any longer you can cover that contingency in those 3 or 4 cylinders of testing.

Another thing to look for are large grains of unburned or partially burned powder that can end up getting under your ejection star during a reload and prevent you from getting the cylinder back into the frame.

You won’t necessarily experience this in 2-3 reloads, but using your preferred tactical reload and seeing large grains of powder on the cylinder face is a good indicator that a grain could land on the inner face of the ejector star. Generally speaking I avoid self defense loads that use colloidal ball powders that leave large unburned or partially burned powder grains.
 
I agree with at least 200 rounds with no malfunctions with a semi auto including at least 100 rounds with your carry ammo.

But for a revolver the major threats are:

- light strikes and hard primers;

- sticky ejection (particularly with small frame revolvers and revolvers with short ejection rods);

- insufficient crimp allowing the bullet to back out of the cylinder and jam the cylinder in the frame.


Three or four cylinders is plenty to confirm reliability of the hammer and primer combination as well as discover any ejection issues.

If you also take a couple rounds and load and reload the, so they both experience the recoil of about 10 rounds and measure or compare to ensure they didn’t grow any longer you can cover that contingency in those 3 or 4 cylinders of testing.

Another thing to look for are large grains of unburned or partially burned powder that can end up getting under your ejection star during a reload and prevent you from getting the cylinder back into the frame.

You won’t necessarily experience this in 2-3 reloads, but using your preferred tactical reload and seeing large grains of powder on the cylinder face is a good indicator that a grain could land on the inner face of the ejector star. Generally speaking I avoid self defense loads that use colloidal ball powders that leave large unburned or partially burned powder grains.

I did not mention it, but I spnd time doing the the growing OAL cartridge length just like you do.
 
Just curious many rounds would you run in a revolver to answer the reliability and function check? 50? 100?

Thanks in advance

All my handguns go to the range. None stays in the Gun Safe and even my Seecamp 32 ACP has 133 rounds down range. My one year old Glock 26 has 800 rounds down range and I may have carried it only six times. (but its fun to shoot)

I have bought used guns in the past that has came with partially used boxes of ammunition. One pistol came with 48 bullets, the owner took two shots apparently. Two snubbies I bought, one came with 45 rounds the other 40.
 
Not to change the direction of the thread, but I don’t buy a lot of handguns like some of you and was a little surprised to read that folks have enough confidence in Glocks that shooting them 5 or 6 times is enough. I don’t own any Glocks. Are Glocks really that much better than other semi-autos?
 
Sure, in a perfect world I would probably toss hundreds of rounds downrange to check a new revolver. I have done that a time or two. Most of the time, I do a quick hands-on mechanical check and fewer than 50 rounds. Maybe 5-6 cylinders full. Sometimes less.
 
Not to change the direction of the thread, but I don’t buy a lot of handguns like some of you and was a little surprised to read that folks have enough confidence in Glocks that shooting them 5 or 6 times is enough. I don’t own any Glocks. Are Glocks really that much better than other semi-autos?
No. Glocks have a reputation for reliability, so do lot of other semi-auto pistols, but lemons do make it out of factories and there is no reason to believe that Glock is somehow different.
 
I'll be honest, I'm a lot less worried about break-in with a revolver.... maybe not concerned at all, really. I fire off a few to see where it's shooting with my customary point of aim. Once I'm satisfied that I know the gun and I are on the same page, I don't have any issues with carrying it.
I do, however, go back and shoot a few from time to time just to remind myself about its POI, especially since I have anywhere from 2 to 5 guns in my "ready to carry" locker.
 
New gun....field strip, clean and oil, then fire a box to break it in.

Next go weekly to the range to become proficient. Twice a month at the very least.

In the interim, dry fire at the TV twice a week.

If you intend to carry you need to put in the time or maybe you should think about it.

Watch out on the TV thing. A friends uncle was on the police force. Every day, as he was going to work, he drew and dry fired at the TV. Why not, the gun was not loaded? He checked it himself. One day he was wrong!
 
This has always struck me as something of an outdated sentiment...

It would seem to me that in the modern era of CNC Machining, firearms typically run perfectly right out of the box, and typically a single box of ammo (50 rounds) is more than enough to inspire confidence, as generally speaking, if a semiautomatic pistol can get through a cylinder/magazine or two without malfunctioning, then you can be fairly certain that it's good enough to trust your life to, because realistically speaking, that's as about much ammo as you could realistically use in a self-defense situation.

Break-in periods are a thing of the past, a relic from an age in which firearms were largely machined by hand, and although they generally had very high standards of quality, firearms were more tightly fit, providing very little clearance between moving parts which in turn made them less reliable because all it took was a bit too much lint in the nooks and crannies to impede function.
Nowadays, firearms aren't very tightly fit at all, which some folks view as a negative, yet their outstandingly reliable. Take a Glock for instance, if you hold it up to the light, you can see that there's a considerable gap between the slide and frame, yet Glocks are known to be of the utmost reliability.

That being said, if you're looking for an excuse to spend an afternoon at the range, then more power to you!
 
Last edited:
I feel confident in a revolver after about 50-100 rounds DA and another box of 50 for single action personally. Gives me a chance to dial in the sights, make sure I have no light primer strikes or timing issues and learn the personality of the weapon.
 
Depends on the gun. I once had a 659 that needed a few hundred rounds thru it to wear in. After that it was totally reliable. With stainless guns I like to fire them enough to get them hot. Probably not necessary. My first duty weapon was a Model 67. Academy qualification was a two week affair, well over 1000 rounds. No problems.
 
Not a big thing with revolvers.

If it will fire a box of ammo without a problem, you should be good to go.
If you get copper shavings in your face, hard cylinder removal, etc. you have problems.

A pistol is the one that needs 200 rounds or more for a "Break in" session
to smooth out the metal and make sure that the used ammo will work in it.

Have fun.
 
Mo more than 50.
Usually 10 to 12.
One of the advantages of a revolver.
200 rounds of anything but 9mm costs some serious bucks.
 
This has always struck me as something of an outdated sentiment...

It would seem to me that in the modern era of CNC Machining, firearms typically run perfectly right out of the box, and typically a single box of ammo (50 rounds) is more than enough to inspire confidence, as generally speaking, if a semiautomatic pistol can get through a magazine or two without malfunctioning, then you can be fairly certain that it's good enough to trust your life to, because realistically speaking, that's as much ammo as you'd use in a real self-defense situation.


Break-in periods are a thing of the past, a relic from an age in which firearms were largely machined by hand, and although they generally had very high standards of quality, firearms were more tightly fit, providing very little clearance between moving parts which in turn made them less reliable because all it took was a bit too much lint in the nooks and crannies to impede function.
Nowadays, firearms aren't very tightly fit at all, which some folks view as a negative, yet their outstandingly reliable. Take a Glock for instance, if you hold it up to the light, you can see that there's a considerable gap between the slide and frame, yet Glocks are known to be of the utmost reliability.

That being said, if you're looking for an excuse to spend an afternoon at the range, then more power to you!

Kahr used to tell customers a minimum of 200 rounds were required to break in one of their new guns, which is ridiculous.
If Glock can make guns that work right out of the box, why can’t Kahr?
 
Back
Top