Calling a Magazine a Clip

The instructions from one manufacturer used to actually say something like "....and place the cartridges in the charge holes...."
Can't remember which one.
Was it Colt?
Sounds like something they would say. After all, WE had to properly name the 45 Long Colt for 'em. ;)

Is that the "wheely thing"?
 
Probably was Colt,,they did have a hard time getting past their C&B revolvers and in to the cartridge era. Charge hole would be more proper for a C&B I guess.
Doesn't matter.

..Have to go refill some more bullets now for my P17..
 
Being from a military background magazine vs clip means something to me. I also have Russian SKS that takes clips. They load the rounds, cartridges, ammo, bullets, projectiles.. into the 10 -round, cartridge, ammo , bullet, projectile...magazine.
NOW clips are becoming obsolete except for these old military weapons, rifles, firearms, guns..
SO more and more people, human beings, homo sapiens, peeps, chaps...are going to interchange the terms to the point that in 20 -25 years the terms will mean the same thing to everyone. (That means dictionary definitions will change). So I use the correct terms and correct people who have an interest in knowing the difference but say nothing, nada, zero, zip, squat to those who could care less.
 
Magazine or clip

Being a civilian born in the mid-fifties the thing (magazine) that you jammed in the bottom of the 'handle' (grip) was always a clip, but we live and learn and develop experience with not just our firearms, but any kind that we find remotely interesting which is just about everything. Heck, at some point I learned the difference between a rifle and a gun, probably during the teenage years. I'm still learning and hope I continue to learn. What does bug me is people that scream for changes in weapons don't know the difference between a magazine and a newspaper.
 
Sometimes Hollywood is right

Being a civilian born in the mid-fifties the thing (magazine) that you jammed in the bottom of the 'handle' (grip) was always a clip, but we live and learn and develop experience with not just our firearms, but any kind that we find remotely interesting which is just about everything. Heck, at some point I learned the difference between a rifle and a gun, probably during the teenage years. I'm still learning and hope I continue to learn. What does bug me is people that scream for changes in weapons don't know the difference between a magazine and a newspaper.

Maybe 1950's Hollywood war movies called them clips? Wait, in the 1950's MI Garands in the hands of that Marine Robert Mitchum was being loaded with clips. (Heaven knows Mr Allison)

I don't know nothing anymore nohow cause my friends all changed. One went completely to the flintlock black powder side. It happened one day when he first shot one. Something about it taking a real man to hold on target as the powder pan blows in your face or something. (And the early deer season).

So I ask him what do you do when it rains. He said he does not hunt when it is raining but if I really wanted to then just put the lock in your armpit.
(Sometimes over coffee the world just stops and forces one to visualize something really uncomfortable).
 
3363684544_1912f3d485-1.jpg


I love it……

You posted - Proverbs 14:7
(Stay away from a foolish man it says)

Then there is that other one "You cannot make anything foolproof because fools can be so ingenious".

So we went through two pages so far before it became obvious that all the WWII movies had soldiers fighting mostly with M-1 Garand clip fed rifles.

No doubt we have all heard some actor say many times Get more clips, hand me some clips, no more clips in the box, or whatever. Now I need to watch a few just to check. If it was only the officers and maybe drivers and tanks that carried 45 autos, with magazines, they were seldom shot. My Marine brother in law that spent the war mostly on a Marine air base always had his magazine fed M-1 Carbine in his trunk. Guys that worked on airplanes or airstrips did not need the heavy M-1 Garand. They would not be using small arms at all unless the marines guarding them were overrun.

Anyway if maybe the movie guns never reloaded, we had millions of vets return, that had carried M-1 Garands, that sooner or later used the word Clips. My brother, my brother in law, my uncles were all issued or trained with M-1 Garands.

I once read an article about why their were so few 45 autos in old movies. The answer was that the blanks they fired were easier to do with revolvers. It was dangerous and expensive to make blanks powerful enough to work the action of a 45 auto. Movie sets have close quarters and sound can be added later.

So I have my alibi for using the "Clips" word too often all worked out.
 
Been around guns all my life and I know the differences between the items in question. I do not make it an issue. If I get asked how many rounds that clip holds I tell them, I understand what the question is and answer it NO BIG DEAL.

I'm on a well known car forum that has a general type question forum area and gun things come up quite often. Some of the other posters belittle people using the wrong nomenclature but if the question is understandable I give an answer without putting on a hissy fit...

Now as a retired pipefitter I get asked a question like my FURNACE is leaking water I will sometimes explain the differences between a furnace and a boiler. ;)---:D
 
It doesn't bother me if they call them clips or magazines. Now 'Bullet Holder Thingy' is another story. :eek:

LOL! My wife calls her magazines "Bullet Holder Thingys" and then proceeds to shoot center rings around most people. I guess I can tolerate her idiosyncrasy cuz I don't want to make her mad.

Charlie :D
 
I sometimes let the use of "clip" instead of magazine slide. However, I immediately point out that the difference between a bullet and cartridge (the use of "bullet" instead of "cartridge" really bugs me :eek:). Interestingly, during the past 45 years (since I was about 16 years old), when I have explained to non-gun folks the difference between clip and magazine or bullet and cartridge, they listen and seem to absorb what I'm saying. However, when it comes to the difference between automatic and semi-automatic, they tend to glaze over. :rolleyes:
 
Jeff cooper in his writings was a real grammer policeman. He complained of people calling revolvers, "pistols" etc. He would have a cow when people call magazines "clips". I dont give a rats butt! As long as we know what someone means.
 
How do you react when someone calls a Magazine a Clip?


I don't usually anymore. Maybe a pic of little girl's hair clips if I'm in a particularly feisty mood. :D

I've moved on to some people's annoying practice of reminding everyone at every opportunity that their extensive knowlege base includes the opinion that (insert gunmaker name here)'s version of the 1911A1 "Isn't really a 1911 blah blah blah..."

All right. Cool story. Here's a freegan cookie. Now go out & play in the street. :facepalm:
 
A switch to make magazine last longer?

If a rifle shoots bursts of three? Is that still a machine gun or is it a semi-semi full-auto?

An "at work" friend of mine years ago was only a few years back from "Nam". He was a Marine that had done the Recon patrols behind the lines and had memorized all the war stories for those of us who practically begged for war stories.

One of his stories was about the new guys in "Nam" who always emptied their rifles magazines in a few seconds at the beginning of a firefight. He described how hard it was to teach them to shoot in three shot bursts. (He fibbed a lot?) He claimed that the M-16's eventually had a lever put on them that you could set to shoot 3 shot bursts.

So, was he lying or was/is there such a switch? If so what is it called? (I know this is almost off topic?)
 
Back
Top