carring with or without a bullet in the barrel?

Ok, I have to explain, English is not my native language

This is all that needed to be said. For what it's worth, your original post was done well enough that I wasn't thinking that language was an issue. I commend anyone who is multilingual.

I have dabbled in German and Italian, but that was many years ago, and I'm afraid I've forgotten almost all of it.

I apologize for any misunderstanding.

Tim
 
Hummmm. Hahaha - Well that happen when you go to the colonies to live with the colonists. Right ;)., It's not so bad at all :D
join-the-dark-side-we-have-cookies-1.png
 
I suspected there was a language barrier at work.

That said regardless of the gun if you aren't comfortable carrying it with a round in the chamber then you need to carry a different gun.
 
I have a question for you that caring the sd9 as a ccw. I normally don't carry the sd9 as a ccw because the sd9 is too big and too heavy on the office job.
But I carry the sd9 on the boat or vehicle.
The sd9 has no safety and I feel not comfortable with a bullet in the chamber without any safety besides a long triggerway directly on my bones.
How do you handle the sdve in a ccw scenario? Do you carry a Bullet in the barrel or not? What is your take on it?
Thank you

All auto that I buy has a safety on them! This way I fell safe to carry one in the chamber. I do not have one that has a safety like the Glock.
 
Last edited:
Yes, same carry principle as any double action revolver. Rounds are loaded, but it won't fire unless your finger is pressing the trigger back. It may just be feeling strange to you carrying around civilians. Honestly I would not carry the pistol unloaded. If something happens and you can't rack the slide back, all you have is a small billy club.

L8R,
Matt

Interesting points, and definitely safe with round in chamber, except perhaps for holstering issues. It helps if shooter started with revolvers and gained that confidence.

However, aren't the Israeli's, who seem to be in sufficiently more dangerous situations, trained to carry Condition 3?

And at least one of our Armed Services I have heard require safety ON with empty chamber on the M9.

Air Force I have read is the most liberal re carry- Condition 2, safety OFF;

Some military require round in chamber safety ON, and there's also empty chamber safety ON referenced above! Correct me if wrong, guys.
 
Last edited:
All auto that I buy has a safety on them! This way I fell safe to carry one in the chamber. I do not have one that has a safety like the Glock.

Glock only has passive trigger safety and firing pin block- no manual safety.

There's really no reason to feel unsafe with any modern hammer or striker-fired auto (with automatic firing pin block/safety) with manual safety OFF, unless one inadvertently and thoroughly pulls the trigger. This applies to Glock, also, which may be considered SA auto along with some others.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to beat you up on this, do what you feel comfortable with. Let me put it to you like this.

You're carrying for self defense. Studies have shown that a BG with a knife can cover 21 feet (7 yards, which is defensive pistol range), in 2 seconds or less. Not much time to draw, load, aim, and fire. Remember, in a defensive situation, YOU are the target. The bad guy has seen you, he has picked you as his target, he has made a plan on how he wants to deal with you, and he is on his way to do the deed. You are the target, you don't know you're the target, you have no idea the bad guy is on the way, and you don't have a plan on how to deal with him. Everything you do is a reaction to what occurs after the BG makes his presence known. Every second spent preparing to react is a second less you have to survive his attack. The "one in the pipe" if you will, may be the difference between you or someone you love, going home or being a statistic on the evening news.

Practice, practice, practice, then practice some more. Focus on your surroundings, people, places, things, movement, and develop and update a plan as you move. Become very familiar with your carry firearm of choice, to the point that carrying it becomes second nature, and if it doesn't work for you, find one that will. If you can't get to that point, it won't matter what you carry or how.

Good Luck and good shooting. :D
 
I think that is referred to as the Teuller (sp.) Drill, and I am aware of it, and I'm sure the Israeli's and others are as well. I am not advocating Condition 3 (as I carry Condition 2 with safety OFF), but there's undoubtedly merit to it, and it is a very subjective choice how one carries. Condition 3 is indisputably a safer method of carry (unless, arguably, one is engaged in a gunfight-but think of all the OTHER times where the benefit outweighs the risk, and that merely showing a firearm may stop a fight, real or potential- and let's face reality unless one is paranoid, it ain't gonna happen to the vast majority of us, even law enforcement).

Furthermore, a simple argument could be made that if one doesn't have the time to rack the slide it won't make a difference anyway. OTOH, George Zimmerman might have been killed had he not already had a round in the chamber of his PF9.

I do agree that confidence/comfort level should dictate mode of carry, gunny. So in the one in a million chance that one engages and needs to use the firearm, if one has the comfort level required for the 'KISS' method of carry, e.g., 'Point n Shoot', by all means carry that way. OTOH, I also advocate that those of us who are 'accident-prone' should be prosecuted for their ND's (they might do all a favor and not carry, or at least use the manual safety where available). The chances of a ND greatly outweigh the probability that one will have to discharge their firearm to protect life or limb.
 
Last edited:
I think that is referred to as the Teuller (sp.) Drill, and I am aware of it, and I'm sure the Israeli's and others are as well. I am not advocating Condition 3 (as I carry Condition 2 with safety OFF), but there's undoubtedly merit to it, and it is a very subjective choice how one carries. Condition 3 is indisputably a safer method of carry (unless, arguably, one is engaged in a gunfight-but think of all the OTHER times where the benefit outweighs the risk, and that merely showing a firearm may stop a fight, real or potential- and let's face reality unless one is paranoid, it ain't gonna happen to the vast majority of us, even law enforcement).

Furthermore, a simple argument could be made that if one doesn't have the time to rack the slide it won't make a difference anyway. OTOH, George Zimmerman might have been killed had he not already had a round in the chamber of his PF9.

I do agree that confidence/comfort level should dictate mode of carry, gunny. So in the one in a million chance that one engages and needs to use the firearm, if one has the comfort level required for the 'KISS' method of carry, e.g., 'Point n Shoot', by all means carry that way. OTOH, I also advocate that those of us who are 'accident-prone' should be vigorously prosecuted for their ND's (they might do all a favor and not carry, or at least use the manual safety where available).
A gunsmith improved trigger makes the SD9 no less safe than it came from the factory. The trigger still needs to be pulled, the firing pin block is still in place. Condition 1 is no less safe than condition 3 for the weapon, what benefits would there be in condition3?? I would really like to see some documented fact having to defend yourself is a 1-in-a-million-chance?? The odds of being struck by lightning in so cal are 7,538,382/1 where Mi it is 519,799 as of 2011 census, recorded # of strikes in the US, by the National Weather Service. I have not been struck by lightning, do not care to, I also have not been shot, also do not care to. I do not know what you mean by accident prone ( untrained, unable to follow instructions,lack of attention?? ) and a firearm (1911) with a "safety", is not as safe in untrained hands as a SD9, 3# vs 5# trigger.
Bottom line is that if you put your finger on the trigger and pull it the gun should go bang, if you do not understand that I would believe that you need training or should refrain from carrying/possessing a firearm. A safety does not make you safe, which is documented by the "rules" of various states that mandate ridiculous internal locks, external safeties, cable locks etc, purely political, not logical, check CDC for the decrease in ND due to safeties, I would love to see it!! Be Safe,
 
Incompetent people make mistakes all the time. And so-called competent people make mistakes, too. It is rare to find a person who has never been in an auto collision, no matter how minor it may be- accidents result from inadvertence, inattention, distraction, impairment, etc. Same with guns. There is little doubt in my mind that seat belts have saved many lives. Helmets for motorcyclists have saved many from death and substantially more severe head injuries.

I am of the opinion that a magazine disconnect is a safe and sound solution to at least partly remedy the inevitable failure to remember to check the chamber. Sooner or later, one may do this when getting the firearm ready for cleaning, and if one pulls the trigger after dropping the magazine without one- BANG!. Sooner or later MOST shooter will forget to decock firearm after chambering a round with a Sig. I could go on and on. Far, far more people have avoided injury and NDs with magazine disconnects than those who fantasize having that round in chamber saving their lives in a struggle where the magazine has dropped. Dream on.

Some of CA laws are stupid and ridiculous, but some make sense to me. Requirement of a prominent LCI both visually and tactilely, and magazine disconnect, in my view, fall into the latter category. The micro-stamping mandate falls into the former category.

In any event, Happy Shooting!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Incompetent people make mistakes all the time. And so-called competent people make mistakes, too. It is rare to find a person who has never been in an auto collision, no matter how minor it may be- accidents result from inadvertence, inattention, distraction, impairment, etc. Same with guns. There is little doubt in my mind that seat belts have saved many lives. Helmets for motorcyclists have saved many from death and substantially more severe head injuries.

I am of the opinion that a magazine disconnect is a safe and sound solution to at least partly remedy the inevitable failure to remember to check the chamber. Sooner or later, one may do this when getting the firearm ready for cleaning, and if one pulls the trigger after dropping the magazine without one- BANG!. Sooner or later MOST shooter will forget to decock firearm after chambering a round with a Sig. I could go on and on. Far, far more people have avoided injury and NDs with magazine disconnects than those who fantasize having that round in chamber saving their lives in a struggle where the magazine has dropped. Dream on.

Some of CA laws are stupid and ridiculous, but some make sense to me. Requirement of a prominent LCI both visually and tactilely, and magazine disconnect, in my view, fall into the latter category. The micro-stamping mandate falls into the former category.
In any event, Happy Shooting!
How many people have avoided injury due to a magazine disconnect? Ask LEO as to reality of dropping a mag with fine motor skills during a fight? If you have a ND other than noise it should not be a problem ( pointed away from anything you are not willing to destroy). Why would you pull the trigger before you get ready to clean a gun? I have carried Sigmas since they were made, I do not pull the trigger with out knowledge of the consequences. I may check too many times!! Inattention, distraction, impairment?? Why are you trying to manipulate your firearm while driving at 75, talking on the phone and drinking coffee?? Impaired--Substance, mental illness, trauma??
I always wear my seat belt, I like LCI, I do not care for mag disconnect but I do not believe that any government should mandate them.
As for lighting strikes I thought it was amazing the discrepancy throughout the US.
The OP asked chambered round or not in his gun, if he does not pull the trigger the gun will not go bang, if he would have a mechanical failure of his gun ( weak striker spring, broken trigger bar ) both would prevent firing not cause it.
I like documented facts, location of lighting strikes was not meant to be personal toward tedburns3, or any one just would rather have facts instead of supposition. Be Safe,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a question for you that caring the sd9 as a ccw. I normally don't carry the sd9 as a ccw because the sd9 is too big and too heavy on the office job.
But I carry the sd9 on the boat or vehicle.
The sd9 has no safety and I feel not comfortable with a bullet in the chamber without any safety besides a long triggerway directly on my bones.
How do you handle the sdve in a ccw scenario? Do you carry a Bullet in the barrel or not? What is your take on it?
Thank you

I would recommend a round in the pipe at all times, but if you feel more comfortable with a round not chambered by all means carry that way.
The most important thing is to have a gun if you need it.

The time it takes to get a round in the chamber may be the same second that you need to save your life.

But either way you choose, always carry your gun when out and about.
 
How many people have avoided injury due to a magazine disconnect? Ask LEO as to reality of dropping a mag with fine motor skills during a fight? If you have a ND other than noise it should not be a problem ( pointed away from anything you are not willing to destroy). Why would you pull the trigger before you get ready to clean a gun? I have carried Sigmas since they were made, I do not pull the trigger with out knowledge of the consequences. I may check too many times!! Inattention, distraction, impairment?? Why are you trying to manipulate your firearm while driving at 75, talking on the phone and drinking coffee?? Impaired--Substance, mental illness, trauma??
I always wear my seat belt, I like LCI, I do not care for mag disconnect but I do not believe that any government should mandate them.
As for lighting strikes I thought it was amazing the discrepancy throughout the US.
The OP asked chambered round or not in his gun, if he does not pull the trigger the gun will not go bang, if he would have a mechanical failure of his gun ( weak striker spring, broken trigger bar ) both would prevent firing not cause it.
I like documented facts, location of lighting strikes was not meant to be personal toward tedburns3, or any one just would rather have facts instead of supposition. Be Safe,

According to the author's office:

"From 1987 to 1996, nearly 2,200 American children 14
years of age and younger died from unintentional
shootings. For every child who dies after being shot,
an estimated 4 children are treated in U.S. hospitals
for nonfatal gunfire injuries. In 1995 and 1996, 8,832
Californians were killed as a result of gunfire.
According to data reported by hospitals to the


SB 489
Page
7

California Department of Health Services, there were
13,153 nonfatal injuries which required hospitalization
during the same period. About 10% of the injuries
during that period of time were determined to be the
result of unintentional shootings.

"Many of these injuries and deaths were the result of
unintentional shootings by users who thought that the
guns they fired were not loaded. Gun users are often
unaware that semiautomatic weapons can be fired when
their loading mechanism - the magazine - is removed or
emptied. A live round of ammunition may remain in the
chamber of the firearm after the magazine is removed.
When the trigger of a semiautomatic firearm with a live
round in its chamber is pulled, it will fire, even
though it does not have a magazine inserted, unless the
gun has a magazine disconnect mechanism.

"A 1997 survey by the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun
Policy and Research and the National Opinion Research
Center found that almost 35% of respondents (who were
all adults) either did not know that a gun could be
fired, or believed that a gun could not be fired with
the magazine removed. 28% of those respondents lived
in households where guns were present. Undoubtedly,
many of those households also included children.

"Teaching children how to "safely handle guns" is not
the answer. Study after study has shown that gun
safety programs for children are ineffective and may
even increase the risk of unintentional firearm injury
to children. In two recent experiments (one by the
University of North Carolina and one by ABC News), guns
were hidden in rooms where children were playing. Both
studies found that children who previously had been
taught not to touch guns and to instead immediately
notify an adult are just as likely to handle guns than
those who have not been so instructed. Another study
released in July 2002 by the David and Lucille Packard
Foundation found that parents overestimate the ability
of their children to deal safely with guns. The report
found that the easiest way to save lives is to make
guns more "childproof" with built-in safety devices.








SB 489
Page
8

One such safety device is a chamber load indicator. A
chamber load indicator alerts the gun user when there
is a bullet in the firing chamber of the gun.
Currently, chamber load indicators are installed on
only about 11% all semiautomatic handguns. Chamber
load indicators are effective safety devices. A 1991
General Accounting Office (GAO) study of shootings in
10 randomly selected cities across the nation found
that 23% of the accidental shootings could have been
prevented by chamber load indicators. The GAO report
explained that '[a]lthough we cannot project to the
country as a whole, were there actually to be the same
ratio nationwide as in the 10 cities we studied, that
would mean there were approximately 157,600 such
injuries each year.'

"Magazine disconnect mechanisms prevent a semiautomatic
weapon from being fired when its ammunition magazine is
removed. They are passive safety devices, which
require no training on the part of the user to be
effective, which is particularly important to prevent
accidents involving children. Magazine disconnect
devices are currently installed on only about 14% of
the semiautomatic handguns on the market.

"Like chamber load indicators, magazine disconnect
mechanisms are effective safety devices. Although
there is no statistical data at this time about how
many deaths the devices could prevent, a 1999 report by
the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research
concluded that magazine disconnect mechanisms are
inexpensive and effective safety devices."

If I were a cop, I'd want the magazine disconnect, because there are many gun-grab incidents. Many cops get shot and killed when gun is grabbed from them during a struggle and end up dead. Dropping the magazine is a sure-fire way not to get shot and killed with your own firearm. See: http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-...er-saves-mag-disconnects-examples-please.html

But I think the best justification and why the legislation was enacted in CA was to protect children, although there are plenty of reports of NDs by adults where they removed the magazine and ended up firing the weapon inadvertently.

As I said, I am all for them.
 
Last edited:
Beretta argued against:

" ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : BERETTa states that, "Beretta
U.S.A. Corp. supplies pistols to the Los Angeles County and
City Police Departments, the San Francisco Police
Department, to the California Department of Corrections and
to numerous other county and city law enforcement
departments throughout California. We also provide a
substantial number of the sidearms used by California
citizens to protect themselves, their families and
businesses and for recreational purposes.

"We recently received a copy of California Senate Bill 498,







SB 489
Page
9

which seeks to require that magazine disconnect safety
devices and loaded chamber indicators be added to handguns
available for sale in California within the next few years.
After reading the bill, we realize that it creates a
potential financial liability for the State of California
that may not have been considered by the sponsors of the
bill.

"SB 489 calls any handgun that does not include a loaded
chamber indicator and a magazine disconnect safety as
'unsafe handgun'. Virtually no law enforcement handguns
used in California have a magazine disconnect safety. Only
some law enforcement handguns have loaded chamber
indicators.

"By calling such guns 'unsafe', SB 489 will be used by
plaintiffs' attorneys as an admission by the State that
handguns purchased for the police are, in fact, 'unsafe'.
Even though these are important firearm design
considerations that argue against he use of these two
features in a particular sidearm (for example, the design
of some semi-automatic pistols makes a loaded chamber
indicator impossible to incorporate due to the shape of the
slide and for pistols that use a tip-up barrel), it will be
difficult for a law enforcement department to argue such a
defense if, for example, an accident occurs involving a
police sidearm and the accident arguably involves the
absence of one of these features when the state legislature
has already agreed in advance that the gun is 'unsafe'.

The U.S. Military uses Beretta pistols and requires that
such pistols not have a magazine disconnect safety. This
feature is also rejected by the Los Angeles and San
Francisco Police Departments, as well as by numerous
civilian users - namely, because they intend the pistol to
fire in an emergency, with or without a magazine, in order
to protect their lives. Most users of semiautomatic
pistols expect the pistol to fire with or without a
magazine. SB 489 confounds this commonplace expectation.

"People who want a pistol with a magazine disconnect safety
can already purchase one. If, on the other hand, someone
in California is injured or killed by an assailant because
their pistol did not function as expected - namely, by







SB 489
Page
10

discharging when the trigger is pulled, with or without the
magazine-they will be able to thank the California
legislature for making this choice for them.

"California already has an extensive system for testing and
approving the safety of handguns sold in the State. We
urge you to reject SB 489 because of the liability issues
created for the State of California, its political
subdivisions and its citizens."
 
Back
Top