Found a nice 35-1 Date help? Light strikes solved!

[wagwan]

Found a very nice 35-1 today. It is in excellent condition with only a slight turn line and grips numbered to the gun.

With a serial of 134xxx my best guess on a ship date is 1968-69. This is based on a post referring to a start number of 70000 in 1960 and an end number of 135465 in 1969.

Can anyone verify if I'm even close to being correct? Thanks!

 

[Delta Romeo]

Looking through the Standard Catalog 4th I agree with your info based on the book. That is a nice little find.

 

[wagwan]

Thanks. Good to know I’m close.

 

[bdGreen]

134263 Model 35-1 August 1969

bdGreen

 

[Retired W4]

134554, April 22, 1969. So how close are you?

 

[wagwan]

I am very, very close to bdGreen so it would seem like 1969 is the year. I guess the month is up in the air since 134554 shipped before 134263. Thank you for the help gentlemen.

Off to the range this afternoon to see how she shoots.

 

[Inland7-45]

Very nice.

I have never actually seen one of these up close. I remember seeing these in the S&Ws catalogs in the late 60s. I actually wanted one. Since the the K-frame .22s were more common I ended up with a model 18-3 which I still have.

It is a shame that they were discontinued. As I started gaining more knowledge about collecting S&Ws I learned just how certain models were slow sellers. Models like the 35, 16, 26, and model numbered HDs and Outdoorsman were not made in great numbers.

 

[bdGreen]

Very nice.

I have never actually seen one of these up close. I remember seeing these in the S&Ws catalogs in the late 60s. I actually wanted one. Since the the K-frame .22s were more common I ended up with a model 18-3 which I still have.

It is a shame that they were discontinued. As I started gaining more knowledge about collecting S&Ws I learned just how certain models were slow sellers. Models like the 35, 16, 26, and model numbered HDs and Outdoorsman were not made in great numbers.

Yep, I've seen a few up close.

Up close and personal.

enjoy,

bdGreen

 

[wagwan]

Sadly, the range session did not go well. Most cartridges (CCI SV) would not fire due to light strikes. The gun looks to have been barely used so I doubt it is wear. So now have to look for dirt in the wrong places, cylinder endshake, etc. I don’t see anything obvious but will get it on the bench tomorrow.

 

[wagwan]

Wow! That’s a nice collection bdGreen!

 

[Model19man]

I don’t see anything obvious but will get it on the bench tomorrow.

Most likely you have some accumulated residue or schmutz behind the side plate. Buy a can of gun scrubber, use proper screwdrivers, and remove that. Then use the spray to clean whatever is causing the problem - it's not likely end shake if the revolver is as good as it looks! That revolver will be a tack driver when you get done.

Here's mine:

 

[Aukula1062]

That is a beautiful revolver! I'm sure you'll work it out.

 

[wagwan]

Well, this is looking more and more like a firing pin issue. There is virtually no end to end play in the cylinder when closed. The cylinder/barrel gap at .006 and the cylinder/recoil shield gap at .011 are virtually the same as my Model 17. The chamber recesses measure the same as well. The only difference that I can see is that the Model 17’s firing pin protrudes noticeably further than the Model 35’s.

The mechanism is very clean inside and solvent / compressed air didn’t help the firing pin in any way. This gun has obviously barely been fired - well, because it doesn’t!

I’m thinking the next step is to pull the firing pin and then either recess the shoulder a little or deepen its socket a touch. I’m guessing the firing pin is hardened? Anybody know?

 

[Sigma40sw]

Check the main spring strain screw. It may be loose or someone may have shortened it for a lighter trigger pull. I have run into this issue on a few used guns I have picked up. Remove the screw and check the end for metal removal. To fix one old M15 I had, I removed the anvil from a spent large rifle primer and used it for a cap on the end of the screw. Fixed my misfires. Later I just replaced the strain screw

 

[MajorD]

Check the main spring strain screw. It may be loose or someone may have shortened it for a lighter trigger pull. I have run into this issue on a few used guns I have picked up. Remove the screw and check the end for metal removal. To fix one old M15 I had, I removed the anvil from a spent large rifle primer and used it for a cap on the end of the screw. Fixed my misfires. Later I just replaced the strain screw

J frames have coil mainsprings so no strain screw.

I would never modify the frame to make it functional, start with the firing pin and spring, and confirm proper assembly / lubrication.
If needed getting a replacement firing pin and spring should straighten it out

 

[wagwan]

Yup, no strain screw - coil spring.

I agree with working on the firing pin first although a frame mod would be very minimal in this case. Only looking for about .005 in. That could be a burr or unfinished edge. I’ll find out but first have to order a cup tip punch to do it right.

Does anyone know if the rimfire firing pin is the same as the center fire? There are extended center fire pins available but they all say not for rimfire. I don’t know if this is because of the shape or because of the risk of dinging the chamber edge? Some also state that they fit only post 1997 frames - I guess a change was made?

 

[BC38]

FWIW, (and I'm certainly no expert) my first thought would be a firing pin damaged by someone dry-firing this one.

The gun doesn't appear to have been shot enough to have any kind of significant wear issues. It is certainly possible that it is just gunked up with powder residues, that also seems unlikely based on its overall condition. It just doesn't look like it has been shot enough for powder fouling to be an issue.

So to me the most likely and logical explanation for the light strikes would be a mechanical issue. I'm thinking firing pin damage due to dry-firing.

S&W and pretty much every other manufacturer advises against dry-firing their 22LRs because of the potential for damaging the firing pin. So that would be the first thing I'd suspect.

JMO and YMMV...

 

[BC38]

...Does anyone know if the rimfire firing pin is the same as the center fire? There are extended center fire pins available but they all say not for rimfire. I don’t know if this is because of the shape or because of the risk of dinging the chamber edge? Some also state that they fit only post 1997 frames - I guess a change was made?

To the best of my knowledge the rimfire and centerfire firing pins are not the same.

Pretty much every rimfire firing pin I've ever seen has a rectangular "nose" profile - whereas every centerfire firing pin I have seen has a round "nose" profile.

But it is certainly possible that there to be exceptions I am unaware of.

 

[wagwan]

I don’t think this firing pin is damaged. I can push it forward with the hammer back and everything feels proper. It just doesn’t protrude as much as the one on my Model 17.

The firing pin tip on both the M17 and M35 is round just like a center fire. Both are undamaged.

 

[wagwan]

I’ve been looking online at some extended firing pins. In one review it is claimed the pin is actually the same length but provides longer travel due to the crosscut being set further back?

So now I’m wondering what actually limits the forward protrusion - the front wall of the socket or the retaining pin?