I carried a G19 for several years. I was never comfortable with lack of a manual safety, and like you, I've never liked triggers with a "dingus". Sadly S&W seems to be joining the dingus club with its newer offerings. The S&W trigger was important and why I bought a 9mm Shield. Anyway, I finally sold my G19. Not six months later I WON a G19 in a drawing I didn't even know I had entered. Since the price was right (-0-) I decided to send it off to Cominolli to install one of their manual safeties (it's supposed to be a DIY job, but I wasn't comfortable with that). The safety works well, doesn't interfere with any operation or take down, and it's both easy to operate and not subject to accidental disabling. I still don't carry the Glock, as it's just a little beyond the size I'm most comfortable carrying all day. Also it still has that dingus.First off, I do not own any Glocks. Secondly I think they are extremely reliable, accurate, consistent and very well designed. So WHY don't I own one?
For me a Glock would only be considered for a EDC pistol - they are certainly no beauty contest winner and I am not into plastic generally . To date, I do not like any of their current offerings for EDC. They either lack the small / light Sig P365-like size, thinness and weight, the caliber I want to EDC (9mm), and the round capacity in that package. I also greatly dislike the trigger "Dingus"!
Quite honestly I am astonished that Glock has never really answered Sig's P365, SA Hellcat, and FN's Reflex. They have a few models that were a feeble attempt, but they have never come out with a true competitive model. I am also shocked that Glock has never offered an optional manual safety from the factory. I am not a Glock fanboy and never owned one, however these facts have always puzzled me.
I loaded it back three times. No go. The primer hit was perfect. I just fired it again ten minutes ago. Same ammunition, no problems. I haven't had a centerfire misfire with anything rifle or pistol in years. Spooked me to say the least, when I considered that COULD have been the round I needed.That's a scary result ! Did you test the primer with one or two more attempts to lite off that primer?
Or was it maybe from the odd lite hit from striker fired M&P?
Just curious.
Ain't it great living in America where you have choices.Here's a blanket comment " I do not like or own any Stryker Fired weapons".
That's a good answer. If you carry them in a full retention holster like LE/Military and treat them like a gun without a manual safety, they are fine. But I prefer a manual safety and I don't like the way they feel when I shoot them.Perhaps they are simply focused on LE and military applications.
Let me make a minor correction, treat them like ANY OTHER gun.and treat them like a gun without a manual safety, they are fine.
I own a few Glocks and carry them. I too was shocked that when Glock came out with the 43, 43x & 48 and they didn't have higher capacity. The slimline model share no backward capatibility with previous generations or other models. That would have made it the perfect opprotunity for Glock to introduce a steel 15 round magazine just for the slimline models to compete with the 365. Or a hybrid magazine as we've seen from PSA. So many people have expressed your position about not getting the Glock slimline models because they don't compete in capacity with other manufacturers models. I have the 48 and love it. I'm fine with 10 rounds. Would I like 15 rounds? Yes, but 10 is fine.First off, I do not own any Glocks. Secondly I think they are extremely reliable, accurate, consistent and very well designed. So WHY don't I own one?
For me a Glock would only be considered for a EDC pistol - they are certainly no beauty contest winner and I am not into plastic generally . To date, I do not like any of their current offerings for EDC. They either lack the small / light Sig P365-like size, thinness and weight, the caliber I want to EDC (9mm), and the round capacity in that package. I also greatly dislike the trigger "Dingus"!
Quite honestly I am astonished that Glock has never really answered Sig's P365, SA Hellcat, and FN's Reflex. They have a few models that were a feeble attempt, but they have never come out with a true competitive model. I am also shocked that Glock has never offered an optional manual safety from the factory. I am not a Glock fanboy and never owned one, however these facts have always puzzled me.
That's true. There are probably more concealed carriers now than ever before bc of the internet. People see it and want to do it. Buying guns, researching guns, getting permits and licenses online makes carrying a gun easier than ever before. That's great but we end up with a lot of people, as you said, who aren't traditional gun people. They end up buying whatever the marketing department is trying to sell this quarter or what ever gun the guy on YouTube promotes this month.I don't own a Glock, but it seems many Glock users did not become handgun shooters (or shooters at all) until the popularity of civilian concealed carry. Same for law enforcement. Not really "gun people" in the traditional sense and that's not a criticism. The Internet followed not long after and lots of folks have been strongly influenced by this relatively new communications form regardless of it's validity or lack thereof.
Settling for striker-fired semi-autos have kept many from exposure to other types of handgun actions that may or may not be superior. Before the critics launch their tirade, my comments, as mentioned already, are not all inclusive.
I don't want this to sound nasty or insulting, but a lot of Glock people seem to believe that Glocks can do things that other pistols can't, and that is just not true.Chief........Why worry as you or I will never own one.......Better choices out there.........Three turn-offs for me......The trigger dingus.........Wrong grip angle,,,,,,,,,,And just plain butt ugly.
I totally agree with the manual safety aspect. I have a Glock, but would never edc one because of that.
To not have a safety on something with a trigger pull that light is asking for trouble and I would bet striker fired weapons of this sort are responsible for a vast majority of accidental discharges.
Want to see a video that will absolutely blow your mind? Find YT videos of how insane the flexing is of rifle scopes on harsh recoiling rifles. I would have NEVER believed a scope could flex THAT much and not instantly fail."Glock built their "empire" by selling cheap guns, cheap"
I was told by a Glock VP that in the beginning, firearms were traded to some LE organizations straight up for their current issues and even donated straight up to get the product out there.
"I never liked the idea of a plastic gun part. Many years ago I shot a friends Glock, it felt like the frame flexed on firing."
You were correct, there are videos of the Glock 21 model frame flexing when firing.
Decades of service should speak for itself, yet Naysayers still climb onto the soapbox to stir the pot of discord…all while competitors work tirelessly to emulate or improve the design.
My Glock is not only 100% dependable but it also can bake a cherry pie, bread, and clean windows and floors.I don't want this to sound nasty or insulting, but a lot of Glock people seem to believe that Glocks can do things that other pistols can't, and that is just not true.
Sounds like you did everything possible to make that round go BANG, strange?I loaded it back three times. No go. The primer hit was perfect. I just fired it again ten minutes ago. Same ammunition, no problems. I haven't had a centerfire misfire with anything rifle or pistol in years. Spooked me to say the least, when I considered that COULD have been the round I needed.
Same with the prettier PPQs. Only striker fired pistols I own.You REALLY want polymer framed perfection? Shoot a Walther PDP and odds are 90% you will like nothing else more or shoot anything better.
I've sold a few Glocks, I recently zeroed a 10mm Glock for a fellow with a red dot sight. In my experience, I have upgraded more Glock triggers than any other firearm in the last 20 years. In an apples to apples comparison, the Ruger RXM has a better factory trigger than the Glock. I have always been pleased with the S&W M&P trigger of the 40 SW M&P Compact.I don't want this to sound nasty or insulting, but a lot of Glock people seem to believe that Glocks can do things that other pistols can't, and that is just not true.
I actually did own a Glock 17 briefly. But being Canadian, I couldn't take advantage of the 17+1 (?) capacity. Suped up the trigger. Still a spongy piece of crap. Surprised by its accuracy but I'm not a TupperWare gun fanboy. Just ain't right. USA made so no cache of Austria either. And it wasn't cheap. So I sold it. Much happier with heavier metal real guns with triggers that I can improve and manipulate. Glock is way overrated.This has been a Glock-free household ever since I discovered the Walther line of striker-fired pistols like the P99 and the PPS. Sold all the Glocks and never, ever looked back.
A Glock looks like the box the Hi Power comes in.Yep, everything about Glock is bad. From the grip to plastic to trigger and they not pretty. Thought same for many years. Then tried a Glock 17 with fiber optic front sight and was hooked. Went from 1911 to Sig 226 then Glock 17 in 3gun for over 25+yr with zero stoppages ever. Go ahead and hate'em but Glock revolutionized the semi automatic handgun and is going strong 45yrs later. Takes some getting used to but it's OK to hate'em. That's why we have chocolate and vanilla...suit yourself.