bmcgilvray
Member
That's kinda tough, lowering the good ol' Model 10 to comparisons with a Glock.
The Glock-haters seem to be just as juvenile as the Glockaholics. You have your choice, you have your reasons. Good deal. Why not state them and leave it at that? Why does it lead automatically to insulting generalizations about the owner, whom you probably do not even know?
I, and in fact all manly men, write with Shaeffer pens. Those blockheads who use Parker pens are just new writers who saw them on television. You can't even modify a Parker pen and the ink is in a plastic tube. My Shaeffer has a metal tube so if the ballpoint KB's it doesn't blow ink in your face. If you are stupid enough to EDC a Parker you better make sure you always wear dark blue shirts.
When someone comes here and asks for advice, that advice might include "Get a Glock." It's advice. You don't have to do it unless you want to. It's worth exactly what you paid for it.
Oh, I see the same thing on "Glock Talk" except someone will recomend a Smith & Wesson from time to time.
Personally I don't care much for Glocks, but they are good guns. Just sort of boring since it seems everybody and his cousin has one. I've always wanted something just a bit different than the crowd. But my wife likes her G-19.
Compared to the technical precision of a 1911, the Glock is an extremely simply weapon. Thus, it can be field stripped in moments, cleaned and reassembled just as quickly; all without a tool. Best of all, the Glock can propel bullets even when dirty or caked with residue and grime.
.
I LOVE Glocks, you can buy used ones cheap and trade them even-steven for S&W's and other guns worth twice as much. It's much harder to double you money investment with other guns.
oldman45, thank you for your enlightening remarks. It is gratifying to learn that you can take apart a 1911 and never require the use of an outside tool. However, there are people including myself who are or were unable to free the barrel bushing from a very tight fitting Les Baer without a bushing wrench.
I take no offense in your ignorance regarding my military service. After all, you were probably not yet born when I served. And, oh yes, when the Colt 1911 I carried on my hip failed to function for me at times near the MLR, the S&W .38 did.
The point of my post was not to denigrate any type, caliber or brand of handgun but simply to state that there are courses for horses and different guns for different purposes.
The S&W is my favorite revolver. This does not preclude my wanting to learn about revolvers or pistols produced by other manufacturers.
The 1911 is the pistol I think is the most mechanically precise and beautiful handgun.
The Glock has its place.
A reason I frequent this forum is because I am continually educated by experienced firearm handlers kindly providing information about their guns.
I wish you well oldman45 and again thank you for your enlightening remarks.
I, and in fact all manly men, write with Shaeffer pens. Those blockheads who use Parker pens are just new writers who saw them on television. You can't even modify a Parker pen and the ink is in a plastic tube. My Shaeffer has a metal tube so if the ballpoint KB's it doesn't blow ink in your face. If you are stupid enough to EDC a Parker you better make sure you always wear dark blue shirts.
I have seen 1911's with the mag blown completely out of the gun, and the grips SPLINTERED and blown completely off the gun, causing injury and wood encroachment on the shooting hand.
In other words, I'm afraid you don't have the steel barrier you think you do. Simply take the grips off a 1911, and you'll notice some real big holes in the gripframe.![]()
You guys crack me up.
I, and in fact all manly men, write with Shaeffer pens.
b'phile, thanks, for the tip on Shaeffer pens...