I'd like a more detailed explanation on why you ditched the 40 entirely. My reason is that as an instructor I have a LOT of people (Mostly women) say "I'm new to armed self defense, what do you recommend?". What follows is a VERY detailed evaluation on my part. After verifying the student's mindset and teaching basics with a 22, I try to get the student into the largest, most powerful gun they can handle reliably (Read: They feel comfortable with). This usually entails their using a pistol/revolver from my accumulation. The 40 does have operational disadvantages for most new shooters, but some take to it like a duck to water.
I'm just curious if 'Im missing some aspect here.
P.S. I've carried a 45 ACP 1911 for 35+ years and now have the resulting back problems. I'm going to switch to a 45c M&P (8 ozs lighter) or a 40c M&P (14 ozs lighter- feels like nothin').
_______________________
Boxers or briefs? At my age, Depends.
My dept. went to the Glock 40 cal. back around 1998. Since then we had continuous problems with this caliber. The sharp recoil would cause breakages. Officers on the smallish side had trouble qualifying as well. Finally in 2012 we completely switched back to the 9mm. Personally, I'm very happy with that decision and wondered why it took so long.