I expect to take some flak on this thought: Is there not some danger in "overtraining", obsessing on what if`s etc? By that I mean if you habitualy train, think out senerios, shoot up a mountain of ammo and money, is there some chance you are "overprimed" and when some gray fringe of a situation oppertunes it`self you open the ball when you shouldnt, or more seasoned experianced heads would defuse the situation without a gunfight and all the attendent aftermath of cause and effect?
I have been there and done just that.
I get what you're saying, but I respectfully must disagree. I suppose compared to some I might fit the "overtrained" description, but I don't believe there is such a thing when quality training is involved. I don't run what if scenarios, but I train to shoot from cover/concealment, weak hand, shoot while moving, practice reloads under stress etc etc. I also train myself to be aware of my surroundings without looking like the guy constantly scanning the crowd.
In my opinion, those that escalate a situation when it could be defused are usually the undertrained rather than the over, then again, attempting to defuse a situation that is beyond defusing can get you killed too. Again, usually brought on by the undertrained.
Clint Smith once said, "The best example of good gun training is to never get in a gunfight." Most people's situational awareness sucks, and that is what leads them into bad situations to begin with.
Avoidance is key, but there are times when things play out that are beyond our control or avoidance, and we must react accordingly with the proper actions, no two situations will ever be the same, and there is no across the board right way to respond, every situation and problem we face will be unique, and our response should be appropriate. Most will require us to simply walk away, but occasionaly more is required.