Is MIM getting over it's stigma?

Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
2,258
Reaction score
3,628
Location
NE IL but I'm from Ohio
I was just wondering if MIM parts are getting more accepted as time goes on? I remember when the hue and cry over the MIM hammers and triggers but you don't here it so much now. In the 1911 world you still here MIM bad, replace with forged / barstock parts. Now I am the first to admit that the older color case hardened S&W hammers and triggers just plain look better but the MIM stuff seems to be holding up over time. As for the 1911 world, it seems to be a general dislike and a lot of anecdotal stories but relatively few actual part failures. It also seems that people are lumping MIM parts and investment castings together.
I am of the mindset that if MIM and or investment casting allows a functional part at an affordable price why not; specially on parts that are not readily visual. If you don't think investment casting can produce a good looking part check our Ruger's offerings. I thought about getting a few spare parts for my 1911 ( a firing pin and bar stock F.P. stop ) then it hit me; my 1911 has a lifetime warranty and is working well; if something actually breaks I will contact the manufacturer and they'll fix it or send a new part. Why should I replace a part that is working well or not broken just because it is MIM.
What say you; Are MIM parts proving themselves over time or do you still think they are junk.

MIM : Metal Injection Molding, Powdered Metal of the correct alloy is mixed with a polymer and injected into a precision mold. The resultant part is oversized and after removal from the mold goes thru various processes that remove the polymer and does other things that result in a part that is net size, heat treatable and has 95% - 100% density (few if any internal voids) The process is very precise, controllable and cuts machining costs immensely.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I have no issue with the quality of the parts. I had a stirrup break some time ago, but it could have happened to a forged part as well. I am not a fan of the parts design and how they fit together, I always have trouble getting the handspring back in right. And they just sound different!! I also notice that the single action pull weight is lighter with MIM than with forged parts. That's neither good or bad, I suppose, but 2 1/2 lbs is getting a little light for an N frame. Otherwise, they are smoother and have tighter tolerances and that is good. So, really, no big deal.
 
I think it depends on the company involved and their machinery/process quality. I have a Taurus PT1911. It has a forged frame and slide, but I am certain the internals are MIM. So far it has been just fine and I trust it's reliability and function. Ruger has been doing MIM for a long time. Their guns work and the parts rarely break.
 
I think it depends on the company involved and their machinery/process quality. I have a Taurus PT1911. It has a forged frame and slide, but I am certain the internals are MIM. So far it has been just fine and I trust it's reliability and function. Ruger has been doing MIM for a long time. Their guns work and the parts rarely break.

I, too, have a PT1911. It has yet to disintegrate in my hands.
 
I have owned guns with MIM parts from Kimber, S&W and Ruger. None of them ever broke. Then again, other than springs, the only steel parts I have broken have been 2 firing pins. Other than that, all good. With all this worry about parts breaking, I gotta wonder what some people do with their guns. Bring a hammer for the tent stakes.
 
Sure MIM parts work great and are reliable. So is a Hyundai. No thanks I’ll pay extra and take the Ford or Chevy.
LOL - all three of those brands use MIM parts in their engines and transmissions as do all major auto makers. Until a better process comes along, which will undoubtedly also be pooh-poohed by non-believers, MIM is here to stay.
 
<sshhhhh>

You’ll wake the Luddites.

ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzz >snort< Huh Wha !!?
Lookie here you whippersnapers :D


The valve seats in our engine were a 55 gallon drum of powdered metal in a former life.
Compressed, sintered, then boxed up and shipped for installation.
If that works for a few hundred thousand miles, MIM kinda has a chance.
 
I've never heard...

...of anybody having a problem with a MIM part. I'm not against MIM at all but it just so happens that I prefer older guns for many reasons, not one of them because they have MIM parts. I like metal semi pistols, too, I have a few and many plastic ones.
 
My first MIM / Lock S&W was a used 629-6 that looked like it was dragged behind a truck in the sand. Covered with tiny scratches, and a pair if torn rubber grips. But the action was tight & right, and the price was cheap.

Spent a weekend in front of the TV with a rag and some Mothers, then disassembled the gun, cleaned and oiled, then reassembled.

Turns out it has one of the best DA triggers of any of my Smiths, and it is one of the most accurate .44's I have of any make or barrel length.

I have to admit I prefer the look of case hardened parts, and no lock, but I cant find any performance / reliability issues with MIM in a S&W.

Larry

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 629 1.jpg
    629 1.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 249
Back
Top