Ziggy2525
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 1,530
- Reaction score
- 3,249
For OWB, I found the Bianchi Cyclone 111 works well for J-Frame cross draw.I'm shopping for a cross draw now for just that reason. Any suggestions?
For OWB, I found the Bianchi Cyclone 111 works well for J-Frame cross draw.I'm shopping for a cross draw now for just that reason. Any suggestions?
The question is not whether someone is willing to get shot with anything. People don't even want to be shot with a pellet gun. That is a straw man argument and weak defense of a caliber.OK, I've said it before and I'll say it again! A 380 will do the job! In my almost 30 years as a LEO, I've seen a few shootings, actual & after the fact. Most crooks & people for that matter don't give a rats *** what caliber your using! They just don't want to be shot or confronted with a gun, period! Pull out a gun and I guarantee you ain't nobody gonna ask you "what caliber is that"?
I've seen more so called "mouse guns", i.e. 22, 25, 32 cal. pistols clear out more street corners, bars, house parties, community centers & gymnasiums, than the law allows! And I've yet to find anyone who is willing to take a hit with any of these calibers, let alone a 380!
I carry a 380 often and have no problems doing so!
I always figure in a self defense situation I might get just one shot at stopping the threat, and I really doubt I will have time to take the perfect shot. If all I had was a 380 I suppose I would be glad I had it, but really I feel better in my mind with something that starts with a 4. Not saying I don't carry a 9mm on occasion but I do prefer a .40 or .45. And no, I wouldn't want shot with even a BB gun either. Who would?
Funny, the actual LEO whose comments I replied to that offended you so much was far more civil and more in agreement with me then you are. He didn't order me to "stop posting" like you did.@Good Sam, I'm not sure that you're in any position to be calling the actual, first-hand experience of a former LEO a "strawman" especially not after using a textbook example of a strawman argument like, "If .380acp were enough then our military and LEO's would be using it."
Honestly, as if these caliber debates weren't already filled with enough folks who make arguments based on preconceived notions, second-hand anecdotal evidence, and even outright conjecture. It gets downright embarrassing once folks start arguing against those who can actually back up their statements with accounts of their own personal experience based on years of service in the Military/Law Enforcement. So please, unless you actually have your own personal experiences with which to counter the statements of a trained professional whose experience with firearms goes beyond hearsay on the internet, just stop.
Seriously, it's one thing to personally distrust a particular cartridge and/or just feel more confident carrying something more powerful, but to go so far as to assert its arbitrary inferiority, especially once someone with actual first-hand experience to the contrary of said assertions, you're only making a fool of yourself.
If .380acp were "enough" then our military and LEO's would be using it. As I understand some agencies won't even allow their LEO's to carry .380's. There must be a reason for that.
Don't get me wrong, I do like the .380 as well as most of the guns they are chambered for and I have carried them both past and present. However, I realize their limitations and I have respect for all research and testing by our military & law enforcement who've came to the conclusion that the .380acp was not "enough" for them.
I can generally agree with that statement but there has never been one time in history, at least here in America, where our LEO or military used or were issued .380's. It's possible it may have seen limited issue for airline pilots or something oddball like that but this would be a rare exception. It did see widespread use in European and other countries but their populace were largely unarmed and no where near as vicious as American thugs.Sometimes department weapons policy is influenced by, for example, the lower cost and higher variety of choices to be had in 9mm ammo and guns compared to .380 ACP.
Politics, and ignorance about firearms and ammo by administrators can come into play as well.
I can generally agree with that statement but there has never been one time in history, at least here in America, where our LEO or military used or were issued .380's. It's possible it may have seen limited issue for airline pilots or something oddball like that but this would be a rare exception. It did see widespread use in European and other countries but their populace were largely unarmed and no where near as vicious as American thugs.
The .380acp has been around since before the 1911 came along yet in all that time our military/police are still not issuing it to this day. This fact cannot be ignored and it begs the question "why?"
Fortunately, it is no mystery to those who work in those fields and have done the research and studies. It's only a mystery to civilians on gun forums who either can't or won't carry something larger or spend more money on a bigger and better gun.
Of course I understand that it's a personal choice. It's all about the individual in America, I get it. "It's what works for me" is the mantra of every arm chair forum commando who never actually had to use their guns in combat or self defense. But there are others who have and they have something to teach us. I choose to listen to them and most don't have any high praise for the .380.What you continue to fail to understand is that caliber selection is a personal choice. It may not matter what cops or the military use.
Opinions about caliber whether or not they are so called expert opinions are just that. Only a fool selects a caliber solely based on someone else's opinion.
To continue on your soap box is a waste of time.