Is The 986 OK with +P+?

D

doc540

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
1,697
Reaction score
1,115
Location
Beaumont, Texas
What's your opinion about LIMITED use of 9mm +P+ Federal 9BPLE 115 grain JHP and Winchester Ranger-T +P+ in a 986?

"practice with +P, then carry +P+"

"occasionally shoot a few +P+ to stay familiar with recoil, POA"

You say what about that idea?
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Since there is NO STANDARD for +P+, it all depends on whose +P+ you use. They range from barely over specs for +P to Major 9 to who knows what? The only safe(?) way to go above SAAMI specs is to ask the manufacturer what pressure the specific loads are, and then decide for yourself what to shoot, at your own risk.
 
It is a 9mm, in an L-frame Smith and Wesson, you are not going to hurt it with "occasional" use of anything factory loaded.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
 
OKFC05 said:
Since there is NO STANDARD for +P+, it all depends on whose +P+ you use. They range from barely over specs for +P to Major 9 to who knows what? The only safe(?) way to go above SAAMI specs is to ask the manufacturer what pressure the specific loads are, and then decide for yourself what to shoot, at your own risk.
Click to expand...

excellent point, I'll edit my post for clarity

I was referring to 9mm +P+ Federal 9BPLE 115 grain JHP and Winchester Ranger_T +P+
 
Last edited:
Read OKFC05’s post again and understand that 9mm is something known, 9mm+P is something known and both are built to an agreed-upon industry standard that S&W is well aware of and has built their firearms around this standard.

9mm+P+ is held to no standard whatsoever and could literally be made with ANYTHING, to produce any pressure and any kind of end result.

S&W has not ever and does not now list 9mm+P+ as an acceptable ammunition, and they will never recommend that you buy it or attempt to use it in their firearms.

Regular 9mm max pressure is very nearly equal to .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum pressure specs. 9mm+P exceeds both.

What, then, is the maximum pressure for 9mm+P+ ?

Well, there is none. So it could be wildly different depending on who made it and what they were attempting to accomplish.
 
Sevens said:
Read OKFC05’s post again and understand that 9mm is something known, 9mm+P is something known and both are built to an agreed-upon industry standard that S&W is well aware of and has built their firearms around this standard.

9mm+P+ is held to no standard whatsoever and could literally be made with ANYTHING, to produce any pressure and any kind of end result.

S&W has not ever and does not now list 9mm+P+ as an acceptable ammunition, and they will never recommend that you buy it or attempt to use it in their firearms.

Regular 9mm max pressure is very nearly equal to .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum pressure specs. 9mm+P exceeds both.

What, then, is the maximum pressure for 9mm+P+ ?[b/]

Well, there is none. So it could be wildly different depending on who made it and what they were attempting to accomplish.
Click to expand...


That would be incorrect if you mean it's just a crapshoot (no pun intended).

I asked about specific rounds with known pressures.

https://www.winchesterint.com/images/law-enforcement/RANGER TSERIES/CRA9TA.pdf
 
Last edited:
I say that you’re incorrect. SAAMI keeps the standards and they go to great length to do so, and they do not keep a standard for 9mm+P+ any more than they do for .585 RhinoBlast.

No S&W has ever been spec’d for .585 RhinoBlast, much like no S&W has even been spec’d for 9mm+P+.

However, S&W also shoots proof loads through their firearms so the 986 is likely to handle that ammo.

For fun, g’head and call S&W and tell ‘em that’s what you want to feed it.
 
Sevens said:
I say that you’re incorrect. SAAMI keeps the standards and they go to great length to do so, and they do not keep a standard for 9mm+P+ any more than they do for .585 RhinoBlast.

No S&W has ever been spec’d for .585 RhinoBlast, much like no S&W has even been spec’d for 9mm+P+.

However, S&W also shoots proof loads through their firearms so the 986 is likely to handle that ammo.

For fun, g’head and call S&W and tell ‘em that’s what you want to feed it.
Click to expand...

Their lawyers have already spoken. :)
 
sodacan said:
Will it void the warranty if the gun breaks?
Click to expand...
Fairly likely if you own up to it.

On the other hand I communicated regularly with a guy who designed guns for the original William B. Ruger and was pretty high up at Ruger's Prescott, AZ plant when he retired.

He'd cut customers a lot of slack if they didn't lie to him and often replaced guns people had damaged via inappropriate ammo.

So, I'd say it's up to the CS person you talk to, might help you if you damaged the gun, might not.

Why bother? You don't get much more out of +P+ than +P. Having said that, I doubt your gun will be damaged by occasional use.

I once talked to S&W and asked if they had ever used the entire cylinder length to up the power of the 500 Mag? Their answer was, why, it can penetrate a cape buffalo end to end what more do you need? Don
 
My question would be, why do you want to shoot/carry +P+ in the first place? From all that I have read on the subject, it is unnecessary and gains you little in terms of performance????
 
I just can't get past:
Smith and Wesson
L-frame
......puny 9mm case, unless you have figured out how to detonate C-4 in a 9mm case, ... really ***!

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
 
Hahahaha.

Buy one and I’ll load you up a round of 9mm and we’ll see if I can take your top strap off.

Game on?
 
Well, I have seen first hand, a model 10 S&W, that the owner fired 11 rounds of .38+p in, the first one was a squib, the other 10 fired, and lodged in the 4" barrel, the 11th was not fully into the barrel, and blocked the cylinder from turning, and bulged the top strap! Now, looking at the case capacity of the 9mm, versus the .38, I'll bet on the L frame!

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
 
Never tried +P+ in a 986, but my poor little 940 has had quite a few Winchester and Federal +P+s through it over the last 20+ years. Only a few at a time, as they will draw blood around the thumb knuckle in short order.

What occurs to me is that the coating on the titanium cylinder of the 986 might be burnt through when using +P+s. Not unlike what happens at times with the light bullet .357 Magnum loads in various other titanium cylindered S&W revolvers.
 
Marshal tom said:
My question would be, why do you want to shoot/carry +P+ in the first place? From all that I have read on the subject, it is unnecessary and gains you little in terms of performance????
Click to expand...


Bingo! Back in the days of jacketed hollow point bullets needing a blistering fast velocity for reliable expansion, and +P was not quite enough, several ammo manufacturers introduced 9mm +P+ loads. The Federal 9BPLE was the king of the +P+ loads.

Skip forward to the 21st century and modern bullets like the Federal HST, Speer Gold Dot, and Winchester Ranger-T, these bullets expand reliably at standard pressures. With modern bullets, +P usually results in even faster expansion, but at the expense of penetration.

As previously mentioned, SAAMI sets pressure limits for standard pressure and +P, but there is no standard for +P+. 9mm +P+ can be anything from just barely over +P to approaching proof load pressure. Will it destroy an L-frame revolver? With limited use, no, not likely at all, but if there is any damage, S&W would not be obligated to honor the warranty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
  • Locked
So What is Wrong with the Newer Model with the Locking Hammer
Replies
17
Views
656
Yendor357
Y
S
986 Owners
Replies
5
Views
493
Torf
T
8shot
S&W 986 revolvers No Dash?
Replies
1
Views
219
Pizza Bob
Pizza Bob
D
Training with the 432 UC
2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
Teddydog
T
M
What is this hole under the lug
2
Replies
20
Views
2K
Gunhacker
Gunhacker

Latest posts

Back
Top