My close friend, Laurie, has no interest in carrying on of my Freedom Arms Model 97 45 Colt revolvers when we are woods walking in Lolo National Forest, home to a large number of bears. Oh, I omitted that she is terrified of bears, having had close experience with three black bears. Her EDC is a 640-1 with Remington .38 Special +P SWC-HP-PB (aka FBI Load). We still have about 800 cartridges of our initial 1600. When in the woods she carries a Ruger SP101 4.25-inch barrel. She is extremely reluctant to carry more powerful ammunition. While she hasn't said it in so many words, She will not use any different ammunition of any sort, such as hardened SWC-GC or plain base of the same bullet weight. Frugal, or foolish??
Okay, I think there might not be a problem if I can determine whether shooting this FBI Load in the SP101 4.25-inch, or even her 640-1 will reliably penetrate a bear's skull at "desperation range", her desperation range being probably more distance than most. About the only things I can think of being helpful are: relatively heavy bullet weight; relatively lower MV retarding bullet's designed-in expansion, enhancing penetration.
This .38 Special ammunition, while not ideal, is it sufficient?
Okay, I think there might not be a problem if I can determine whether shooting this FBI Load in the SP101 4.25-inch, or even her 640-1 will reliably penetrate a bear's skull at "desperation range", her desperation range being probably more distance than most. About the only things I can think of being helpful are: relatively heavy bullet weight; relatively lower MV retarding bullet's designed-in expansion, enhancing penetration.
This .38 Special ammunition, while not ideal, is it sufficient?