They were getting indictments for Yevgeny Prigozin and others, aside from sanctioning Russian individuals' illegally transferred money.
as disinformation campaigns led by some of the op's news sources like to say, "presented with no specifics and not a shred of evidence". It is presented with a ton of innuendo and association techniques. Nowhere is there presented an actual mis informational action that can be checked or verified.
Where was the DOJ when Russia, Russia, Russia, the wiped hard drive and the 'laptop is a lie' were being fed to us ad nauseum?
Credibility, once lost, is hard to regain.
Anytime an American has a vague (or worse) feeling of anger toward their government, country, law enforcement, military, etc., without any particular evidence, that’s enemy propaganda at work.
Bunk. Embedded in this article is the actual indictment from the grand jury. Ignore the article and read the indictment for specifics. Read the full federal indictment accusing Russians of funding divisive online content in the U.S. | PBS News It's also here: Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Disrupts Covert Russian Government-Sponsored Foreign Malign Influence Operation Targeting Audiences in the United States and Elsewhere | United States Department of Justice - open the press release, then click on 'view the affidavit.'
That's a fairly general statement. I have had a general distrust of government since I was a teenager.
"This content generally consisted of English-language social commentary.", but did not provide a specific example.
"Shudra") privately messaged Founder-I on Discord asking that "one of our creators . .. record something about [the] Moscow terror attack." Despite public reporting that the foreign terrorist organization ISIS had claimed responsibility for the attack, AF ANASYEV A requested that U.S. Company-I blame Ukraine and the United States, writing: "I think we can focus on the Ukraine/U.S. angle .... [T]he mainstream media spread fake news that ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack yet ISIS itself never made such statements. All terrorists are now detained while they were heading to the border with Ukraine which makes it even more suspicious why they would want to go to Ukraine to hide." "
This would be a specific example, but not apparently associated with medias comments that they are spreading other types of disinformation. Also couldn't find a pretext that the U.S. companies were totally dependent on the stories/disinfo being provided by the ruskies.
Lots of specific illegal finacing and such, but theses are beyond me
They were getting indictments for Yevgeny Prigozin and others, aside from sanctioning Russian individuals' illegally transferred money.
Some folks seem to forget that prosecutors are legally and ethically forbidden to charge and try someone unless they believe he is guilty and have the evidence to prove it.
Small fish compared to mass domestic propaganda and censorship of dissenting opinions.
Before we start spouting federal crime statistics and conviction rates we should take a close look at what those overall statistics deal with, the kind of crimes, the kind of criminals and the sentences. Almost none of those statistics are particularly relevant to this discussion (it is interesting reading)
https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/...2022/FY21_Overview_Federal_Criminal_Cases.pdf
The US Government has many faults, and has been guilty of many things in the past, but to see our fellow Americans on here allege that our elected government, and our own government officials, are no more trustworthy than a murderous Russian dictator and his thuggish myrmidons is truly depressing. Propaganda works, and those who are most easily influenced by it are those who deny its existence and/or fail to recognize it when they see it.
especially certain prosecutors in new york city.
Well lets see here. Was crossing the street outside of the crosswalk the other day, and got charged for jaywalking. The prosecutor didn't like my politics so he separately charged ne for every step taken in crossing the street. Then being thoroughly corrupted by politics, he said my crossing the street was directly related to an unnamed, unproven, untried crime that made each step taken a separate felony.
Course in the pit of snakes, all snakes are legally and ethically forbidden to bite another snake.
Then again, for an obvious political post, no one will complain about it being political untill they are disagreed with?