Mags for M -1 carbine

Are their any good after market mags for the M-1 carbine ? Or are we de pendant on old surplus I just picked up an Underwood carbine from my local pusher (pawnshop) and like to get some mags 10 , 15 ,20 or 30 which will work best. I have always wanted one of these.
I have a few and no carbine, so sell cheap. Annie Rea 1920
 
The M1 Carbine was considered successful in its day because it was new technology. Semi-auto longarms were still somewhat experimental.

Thus, their standards for reliability were different than todays. Then it was felt the pros outweighed the cons and they considered the trade-off worthwhile. Today, if the M1 Carbine was introduced, with all of its inherent issues, it would be a massive failure.

It's a cool piece of history and I enjoy mine for that reason. But, as a practical weapon in the here and now? Absolutely not.
Today IS NOT yesterday..............
 
Here's a few books on the 30 Cal. M-1 Carbine, my copy of " War Baby" is in workshop. Suggest those interested in 30 Cal. M-1 Carbines BUY some reference books. There are some errors in most books but no one is perfect.
Greyman50, is right. I collected carbines and associated equipment for about 10 years. I have seven reference books on the subject. Never have to many!
carbines.webp
 
Are their any good after market mags for the M-1 carbine ? Or are we de pendant on old surplus I just picked up an Underwood carbine from my local pusher (pawnshop) and like to get some mags 10 , 15 ,20 or 30 which will work best. I have always wanted one of these.
Always people refer to the magazines as if they work by magic.
Aftermarket mags fail simply because of the word "aftermarket", and the factory mags work because "factory" or in this case, "G.I. They ought to be able to explain specifically and scientifically why magazines don't work and how they could be modified to work.
Even comments on the thread referencing single use, (and I concur with AJ's opinion that reusing mags is NOT part of combat,) those comments still do not explain what happens to the mags when they are used once that destroys them, or how to fix them.
Another comment on "tuning" your magazines was helpful.
My experience:
The M2 mag catch is necessary to prevent movement of the front of the 30 round magazine during firing.
The hold open follower is a pain. If it works. All it does is make magazine changes more difficult because you must pull that follower off of the bolt as you pull the mag out, and then the bolt slams home anyway. So either way you must operate the handle all the way to charge the weapon. You can learn how to make mag changes work so this is nothing to worry about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJ
Are their any good after market mags for the M-1 carbine ? Or are we de pendant on old surplus I just picked up an Underwood carbine from my local pusher (pawnshop) and like to get some mags 10 , 15 ,20 or 30 which will work best. I have always wanted one of these.
15 rounders usually work the best and are the most practical.
 
Gee could have taken several M-2s apart in Vietnam and sent parts home with 0 problems as all they " were looking for" was dope. Wonder how many were mailed home???.
It wasn't that long ago the pieces/parts to convert an M1 to M2 were available at gunshows. As I understood it, it was not illegal to have them as long as they weren't installed in an M1.
 
The " mystic" of shooting class 3 is ok for those of us that " have been there and done it" and shooting MGs at many shoots since the 70s. IMHO many get carried away from seeing tv, movies and online junk and go crazy. Realize many states don't allow such but there are a few indoor ranges in many states that one can rent class 3 to shoot. If one has " the itch" go find a range and shoot one.
 

Attachments

  • 2657F77F-3A14-46F1-8245-B46B7564520D.webp
    2657F77F-3A14-46F1-8245-B46B7564520D.webp
    249.5 KB · Views: 0
  • BC6E9701-390A-4C48-8469-BDBCFA6D2588.webp
    BC6E9701-390A-4C48-8469-BDBCFA6D2588.webp
    200.8 KB · Views: 0
  • F3EE46EC-5286-4A13-8869-F66F2B950A3D.webp
    F3EE46EC-5286-4A13-8869-F66F2B950A3D.webp
    76.8 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: AJ
It wasn't that long ago the pieces/parts to convert an M1 to M2 were available at gunshows. As I understood it, it was not illegal to have them as long as they weren't installed in an M1.
My understanding is an individual piece or two is OK, but to own the full group it needs to be registered. That is of course a problem if not already done.

edited.
 
Last edited:
Certainly. Bolt hold open is certainly nice but again, under duress he may not have recognized that the bolt was open and the mag empty. I have witnessed plenty of police officers shoot till empty and not recognize the condition until they pulled the trigger. I'm not arguing for or against a hold open, only that in a gunfight most know they need to reload when they pull the trigger and nothing happens. Street stress is not reproducible in range training and rarely understood.
My point was there was no hold open on the 15s which is all they had at that time. He didn't know it and a squad of dead to rights Japs ran away. Tactical (the most overused word in firearm history) and speed didn't matter to that guy on Tarawa. He didn't know he was empty and had the mag follower been a hold open I guarantee that he'd know it. The weapon acts and feels different when not cycling as expected.
 
My understanding is an individual piece or two is OK, but owning the full group or significant portion of the full kit needs to be registered. That is of course a problem if not already done.
As it was explained to me was: You could own all the pieces to make it full auto. You could have all except the selector lever in the trigger group and in the carbine. Once the selector lever was installed you were in violation. Bought a carbine when I was early in my collecting of carbines phase that had an trigger group with all the M2 parts except the selector lever at a gun show. I about had a heart attack when I saw it. I talked to a friend that owned a gun store and he explained to me that I was fine as long as the selector lever was not in place. At the time all M1 and M2 parts were plentiful and for sale at gun shows and on-line.
 
The " mystic" of shooting class 3 is ok for those of us that " have been there and done it" and shooting MGs at many shoots since the 70s. IMHO many get carried away from seeing tv, movies and online junk and go crazy. Realize many states don't allow such but there are a few indoor ranges in many states that one can rent class 3 to shoot. If one has " the itch" go find a range and shoot one.
Shot enough full auto weapons in the Corps to know that I don't really want one and for sure can't afford to feed one even if it was .22LR!
 
Ian had an interview with an old time so called expert of the M1 carbine. Ian specifically stated he could never get any M1 carbine to work reliably. The so called expert simply replied with a contrived polite excuse and that was and I quote "The standards of reliability were less during those days". He was admitting Ian was 100% correct.

I myself was warned by my buddies way back in the 70's not to expect an M1 Carbine to work reliably and when I bought several they were 100% correct. Neither their carbines nor mine was worthy of taking into a battle unless you planned on committing suicide and going out in a blaze of glory.

The carbine's low recoil and dashing looks even made a big hit with the WWII Japanese as they often used the battle field pick up M1 carbines. I suppose their smaller statue made the lower recoiling M1 Carbine appealing and since they had a bad habit of using banzai suicide charges poor reliability was not a problem.

G.I.'s liked the Carbine for guard duty in the South Pacific at night because of its firepower over the 1911 or M1 rifle. They simply emptied one into the black of the night when they heard the slightest noise at night.

In defense of the M1 Carbine I once did a penetration experiment because the Carbine was often bad mouthed by the usual Dufus gun writers as having poor penetration. As usual they were wrong. When I shot into car windshields the carbine fmj bullets penetrated the auto windshield while the more modern 5.56mm using fmj commercial bullets did not penetrate very well often fragmenting. Green tip ammo did penetrate because (despite denials by gun owning Congressmen) it is armor piercing ammo. That came about when the ATF tried to ban the sale of surplus green tipped ammo.

Like General Patton I was always appalled by the poor accuracy of an M1 Carbine. Of course those that defend this weapon claim it was only meant to replace the 1911 pistol and was to be used only for close range blasting. This it will do if shot at normal pistol ranges of under 50 yards.
That "old time so called expert" you refer to is none other than Ken Hackathorn who most certainly IS an expert and has probably forgotten more about firearms than any of us will ever know. He is a former Gunsite Instructor as well as travelling internationally to train Tier 1 anti terrorist military units. When he speaks I listen and learn things from this man.
 
There are some M2 carbines around that are returned to M1 carbine function, that is not full auto. On the receiver they are marked M2 or were altered into a M1. These are still considered to be M2 full auto machine guns. All later "Potbelly"gunstocks are relieved on the left side to accommodate the M2 parts, these are fine to use in either mode. If you own an M2 or altered M2 they will probably be OK but don't be surprised if you wind up in trouble. Winchester and Inland were the only companies making M2 carbines. I'll repeat that there are hundreds of thousands of dead Germans, Japanese and Chinese that would tell you that the Carbine is a good reliable weapon but they can't.
 
If you have a carbine marked M2 on the receiver, you had better have the proper paperwork. If not BATF will come knocking if they find out.
 
Back
Top