Working in a coastal environment, stainless revolvers were a major boon to us in particular. But at the same time, LE in general was making a massive transition towards stainless revolvers. Once started that did not change until semi-auto pistols took over.
I very often read here strong, almost vehement, preferences expressed for blue steel/walnut. I agree that high polish blue and walnut have certain classic beauty. I have a late model Winchester 52 built by Miroku that exemplifies this. I would describe it as subdued elegance. I also have a customized Ruger 77/22 varmint model that is a great shooter, and my favorite .22 rimfire. But the 52 has it beat in the looks department.
For me, firearms, other than display and/or collector pieces, are functional tools. That is when stainless (and I do know that stainless is not really stainless) can show its benefits. Between duty, off duty, backpacking and horse packing (in plain sight) I have greatly appreciated the additional durability of stainless. I am OCD about firearms maintenance, so my cleaning standards have not been compromised. But there are times, especially in the back country, where it might be a while before I could clean/lube a firearm. Stainless gave me enough of an additional margin to ensure peace of mind.
My no-dash 586 is electroless nickel plated because I wanted to replicate as much as possible that same finish durability as stainless.
Stainless on the trail, as OP illustrates, just makes sense.