Modified 1917

Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
14,869
Reaction score
20,698
Location
Spokane, WA
I was looking at one today that I'm seriously considering.

The barrel has been shortened to 4-1/4", recrowned, and a new sight silver-soldered on. Looks to be pretty well done. Lockup and action are good, as are the bore and chambers.

Probably refinished at the time the barrel was cut, because there is a hint of of very slight pitting under the bluing on the left side, and the hammer and trigger have been polished - no case colors left. Slightly more sideplate gap than normal. Otherwise the rollmarks and finish all look pretty good.

It has all the patent rollmarks on the top of the barrel, not centered of course, and the sight base actually overlaps the rollmarks, due to the shortened barrel.

It has a Hogue monogrip on it, so I'd want to replace those since they are so ugly.

With a serial number of 183XXX and all the patent rollmarks on the top of the barrel, I'm assuming it is a commercial model, correct?

Pretty hard to pass on a good shooter like this one for under $400 OTD.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Sorry, I didn't take any pictures. I already have an old shooter-grade 1917 commercial with the 6" barrel, so I was seriously thinking of just passing on this one.

But I got to thinking about it and pretty much came to the "any shooter N-frame is worth $500" conclusion.

I'm just a sucker for 4" N-frames...
 
I learned a long time ago that I couldn't buy every good deal that I run across. Only you know if the purchase would fit your situation.

But it sure sounds like a good deal. If done right, it would be a very hansom and practical revolver in a caliber that starts with four. You could almost certainly get your money back out of it … :)
 
My gun show rule #5 is never pass up a good deal on a decent gun: you can always resell a good deal and get your money or more out of it if you decide not to keep it!

The # is too high for a WWI military gun, and if it doesn't have these roll marks, it's a commercial:

Butt stamping:

f8a824aa708ddc02a71df9ada6c6eb68.jpg

Photo credit: lestert357


Under barrel stamping:

93e62a8f.jpg

Photo credit: gjamison

Be sure to check for rechambering to 45 Colt if that matters to you.
 
Good things to check Hondo44.

With the nasty Hogue monogrip on it checking the butt might be a little difficult pre-purchase, but I already checked under the barrel and there is no US property mark or any sign of the kind of grinding that would be necessary to remove it if it were ever there. That's another reason I concluded that it was a commercial model.

The old commercial model I already have has a 177XXX serial number so since this one is higher, that is further confirmation.
 
Went back and did the paperwork and put half down ($175) on it today.
Snapped a couple of quickie cell phone pics.
Gotta' ditch those ugly Hogues just as soon as I can get it out of BGC jail.
 

Attachments

  • 20200512_165030-1.jpg
    20200512_165030-1.jpg
    90.2 KB · Views: 1,071
  • 20200512_165018-1.jpg
    20200512_165018-1.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 267
Last edited:
What I can see sure looks good, but unknown what the grips are covering up. If the rest of the gun is in the same condition as the "naked" parts, you really got a deal.
 
I would buy that in a heartbeat!I love 45 acp revolvers and I have one modified 1917 That I truly love.
 
...I'd buy it for $350...

...but the side plate fit and front site detract from the overall condition...

...still looks like a fun shooter though...

...looks like the frame says MADE IN USA so the frame is from 1922 or later...

attachment.php
Yeah, no doubt about it being refinished. The front sight doesn't look anything like the original, but it seemed to be pretty well done. It is nothing more than a shooter for sure.
But a working N-frame in 45 ACP that is even cosmetically presentable for $350. I couldn't pass on that.
 
Went back and did the paperwork and put half down ($175) on it today.
Snapped a couple of quickie cell phone pics.
Gotta' ditch those ugly Hogues just as soon as I can get it out of BGC jail.

Looks nice!! I see what you meant about the front sight! Yuk.

I had two shooters with violated front blades like that and couldn't stand them.

On the first one the barrel was also cut so no collectibility, but I still wanted the original sight. I found a front 1/2 of a .44 barrel with an original blade. Cut the base out of the barrel, curved the bottom and made it higher like the .45 needs by leaving a little extra under the base, un-soldered the goofy front sight, and soldered the new one on.

Another one with original barrel length and sight base also had a funky file job on the blade. I milled it off and milled a slot in the base just like the factory did for target models. They would pin in a target front blade.

But I made a proper 1/2 moon sight blade and pinned it in place. That's what I'd recommend for yours. You won't have to jeopardize the barrel blue by soldering a replacement base and blade on.

Just some ideas if it helps,
 
Looks nice!! I see what you meant about the front sight! Yuk.

I had two shooters with violated front blades like that and couldn't stand them.

On the first one the barrel was also cut so no collectibility, but I still wanted the original sight. I found a front 1/2 of a .44 barrel with an original blade. Cut the base out of the barrel, curved the bottom and made it higher like the .45 needs by leaving a little extra under the base, un-soldered the goofy front sight, and soldered the new one on.

Another one with original barrel length and sight base also had a funky file job on the blade. I milled it off and milled a slot in the base just like the factory did for target models. They would pin in a target front blade.

But I made a proper 1/2 moon sight blade and pinned it in place. That's what I'd recommend for yours. You won't have to jeopardize the barrel blue by soldering a replacement base and blade on.

Just some ideas if it helps,
The front sight doesn't look that bad to me. It isn't anything like the original, but it isn't that bad either. I've certainly seen a lot worse. If it shoots to point of aim, I probably won't do anything to it.
To each his own I guess.
 
Considering it is not a factory length barrel, I would not expect a factory front sight. To me, the front sight needs to help me hold on target, regardless of shape.

Here is a modified front sight on a 1950 Military Model that works pretty good for my eyes. Although I am considering adding a gold bead.

Kevin
 

Attachments

  • A66B2ED9-6A53-4DAD-B390-743A8AF15550.jpg
    A66B2ED9-6A53-4DAD-B390-743A8AF15550.jpg
    40.4 KB · Views: 89
I would just leave the front sight as is unless the point of aim is really screwed up for your desired range. Even then, being the lazy type, I would probably say "Look, it shoots point of aim at SOME range.
 
Yeah, no doubt about it being refinished. The front sight doesn't look anything like the original, but it seemed to be pretty well done. It is nothing more than a shooter for sure.
But a working N-frame in 45 ACP that is even cosmetically presentable for $350. I couldn't pass on that.
Well, you could always get yourself a felt fedora, whip(where legal to own), and of course a flapped holster and have an adventure while carrying this Indy gun? Congratulations, I'd have purchased this in a New York minute. Sorry, I just watched this series of movies again recently.
Steve
 
Last edited:
Considering it is not a factory length barrel, I would not expect a factory front sight. To me, the front sight needs to help me hold on target, regardless of shape.

Here is a modified front sight on a 1950 Military Model that works pretty good for my eyes. Although I am considering adding a gold bead.

Kevin

For the life of me, I've always wondered why an articulate pistolsmith couldn't just cut the barrel reshape the bottom and then silver solder the original front sight onto it in the new position? Maybe adding some height to compensate for the shortening? Of course the real issue here is the position of the lettering(patent dates ie.).
Steve
 
For the life of me, I've always wondered why an articulate pistolsmith couldn't just cut the barrel reshape the bottom and then silver solder the original front sight onto it in the new position? Maybe adding some height to compensate for the shortening? Of course the real issue here is the position of the lettering(patent dates ie.).
Steve

It all comes down to $$$$. Cutting the barrel is simple. Taking the cut off piece and removing everything that isn't front sight is a bit more difficult. Then milling it to approximate the original configuration is a bit more difficult.

Just $$$$

Kevin
 
Steve and Kevin,

I agree with both of your statements. Milling machine work is nice, but the set-up takes the time, and as they say time is money. There were many years when I didn't have a milling mach. But my time is cheap, it's a hobby. I did many things by hand. Even now with a milling mach I still do small one off projects by hand. But it's the craftsman time instead of set-up time.

The sight/base comes out of the old cut off barrel quickly with a carbide cut off wheel leaving a 1/32"-3/64" border around the sight base. This retains the small factory radius surrounding the base that tapers to the barrel surface, so important for that factory look matching the original forged integral base with the barrel. The knife edge polish blended into the barrel also leaves a much larger "footprint" for a good solder connection.

The extra material underneath the sight base also comes out fairly quickly by drilling out the barrel bore before cutting the sight out of the barrel. Then it's just a matter of fine tuning the height.

I use an old barrel wrapped in 150 to 240 paper. Run the sight up and down the barrel which at the same time replicates the curvature underneath the sight base to match the outside barrel radius perfectly. Leave the surface coarse from the sandpaper grit for a good solder joint adherence.
 
Back
Top