My recently acquired Model 10

daveboy

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2024
Messages
180
Reaction score
465
Yeah, I know it's just a Model 10, and they are just ho-hum service revolvers produced in great numbers. But, this is my first. I have a couple of the earlier M&Ps with the pencil barrels, but no numbered model, and none with the "bull-barrel". I'd been looking for quite awhile because I wanted one in really nice condition and I finally found this -8 on GB. I got it for a touch over 4 beans, but with tax, shipping, fees, etc., it was about 5. Still, not bad for a gun in this condition, IMO. I don't collect museum-quality collectibles, but I prefer guns with a little honest wear that I can also have a good time shooting. This gun has just enough thinned bluing at the muzzle, front edge of the cylinder, and front of frame to tell me that it has been in and out of a holster a few times. But, it has definitely not been fired much. Its barrel/cylinder gap measures .005" with end shake of .004". Removing the sideplate, it appeared that it might not have been removed since manufactured, circa 1972. There was a lot of gunk. A little cleaning, polishing, removing two coils on rebound spring, and gently filing of strain screw got me a very smooth 3 lb SA pull, and 9 lb DA. To me, this is perfect for anything other than a strictly target gun. I did a tiny bit of touch-up bluing on the worn spots, refinished the stocks (numbered to the gun) because a previous owner had scratched his illegible initials into the bottoms, and am pretty proud of the results. I fired two cylinders just to ensure everything worked as it should, and plan to load some ammo and test for accuracy soon. "There are many like it, but this one is mine."
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2115.jpg
    DSC_2115.jpg
    626.6 KB · Views: 1
  • DSC_2117.jpg
    DSC_2117.jpg
    405.8 KB · Views: 1
  • DSC_2118.jpg
    DSC_2118.jpg
    427.6 KB · Views: 0
  • DSC_2122.jpg
    DSC_2122.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • DSC_2125.jpg
    DSC_2125.jpg
    379.6 KB · Views: 1
  • DSC_2127.jpg
    DSC_2127.jpg
    437.4 KB · Views: 1
  • DSC_2128.jpg
    DSC_2128.jpg
    456.2 KB · Views: 0
  • DSC_2130.jpg
    DSC_2130.jpg
    412.9 KB · Views: 1
Register to hide this ad
I have never been a fan of the aesthetics of the 4” heavy-barreled Model 10. They just look “clunky” to me.

That said, if I had to pick one of my several M&Ps for “serious” purposes it would be my 10-6. I found it languishing in the corner of a shop several years ago and a price too low to pass on. A previous, well-meaning owner had apparently injected oil into its innards regularly, and it had turned to something akin to varnish. A complete disassembly and thorough cleaning revealed it to be a true gem.

It’s a nice reminder that it’s the beauty on the inside that counts.

IMG_5820.jpeg
 
Congratulations, it's nice that you found one in great condition. I once had an opportunity to buy a mint, blue 4",10-8 with a round butt frame but passed because I thought it was priced too high for the time period. I've regretted that decision for a long time. I did eventually manage to obtain a nice nickel 10-10 but blue guns are my preference. Earlier this year I picked up a 13-2 that I figured also scratches that itch for a blue model 10, 4-inch gun. S&W Nickle 10-10 .jpgM13 2 LS.jpg
 
"I have never been a fan of the aesthetics of the 4” heavy-barreled Model 10. They just look “clunky” to me."
The looks took a little getting used to. I found that my Model 19 and 586 have the same barrel profile, but look more "balanced". I'm thinking it has to do with that exposed ejector rod. The 19 has a shroud, and the 586 has a full-lug. The looks are beginning to grow on me, though.
 
Yeah, I know it's just a Model 10, and they are just ho-hum service revolvers produced in great numbers. But, this is my first. I have a couple of the earlier M&Ps with the pencil barrels, but no numbered model, and none with the "bull-barrel". I'd been looking for quite awhile because I wanted one in really nice condition and I finally found this -8 on GB. I got it for a touch over 4 beans, but with tax, shipping, fees, etc., it was about 5. Still, not bad for a gun in this condition, IMO. I don't collect museum-quality collectibles, but I prefer guns with a little honest wear that I can also have a good time shooting. This gun has just enough thinned bluing at the muzzle, front edge of the cylinder, and front of frame to tell me that it has been in and out of a holster a few times. But, it has definitely not been fired much. Its barrel/cylinder gap measures .005" with end shake of .004". Removing the sideplate, it appeared that it might not have been removed since manufactured, circa 1972. There was a lot of gunk. A little cleaning, polishing, removing two coils on rebound spring, and gently filing of strain screw got me a very smooth 3 lb SA pull, and 9 lb DA. To me, this is perfect for anything other than a strictly target gun. I did a tiny bit of touch-up bluing on the worn spots, refinished the stocks (numbered to the gun) because a previous owner had scratched his illegible initials into the bottoms, and am pretty proud of the results. I fired two cylinders just to ensure everything worked as it should, and plan to load some ammo and test for accuracy soon. "There are many like it, but this one is mine."
That's a fine looking handgun you've acquired, Dave.
I think anyone would be proud of owning such a nice example of a classic handgun.
Congrats. (y)
 
Back
Top