New Model 69

[Roadranger]

I see where S&W are showing the new Model 69, a 5 shot 44 Magnum in SS apparently built on either the K or L frame. It's #162069 on S&W's web site. It's 4" built just like the new again m66. I would have bet money this would never have happened. The 69 model would have been next in line after the M68 as their 2 digit models go. Bob!!

 

[RIDE-RED 350r]

The m69 is built on the L-frame (stated in the product description for the m69)

I would have been VERY surprised if it was on the K-frame with all the hubbub about K-frames and 357mags and forcing cone issues some have had.

All that aside, that REALLY has me intrigued!

 

[CWH44300]

I thinking,
I might have a look at one of those.
A 5 shot 4" gun sounds kinda fun.

 

[TheYoungblood]

It is L frame. It is posted on the website. I like it alot! Maybe I could sell some things to buy one! Woo hoo! This would make a nice trail gun.

Drool.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/...57751_757751_757751_ProductDisplayErrorView_Y

 

[DR505]

Intriguing concept, but I have a 4" 629-4 that fills this niche. About 4 ounces heavier and a bit wider to be sure, but it holds six rounds.

 

[WCCPHD]

Sounds great, but will probably be a handfull with full magnum rounds. I think I will stick with my 44 special 696 as it should carry a bit better with the three inch barrel. YMMV.

 

[KLYDE]

youngblood's link is not working. Is this a fixed sight gun? Someone tell me where I can get a look at this. It might possibly be the only new S&W I would be interested in.

 

[DR505]

youngblood's link is not working. Is this a fixed sight gun? Someone tell me where I can get a look at this. It might possibly be the only new S&W I would be interested in.

Product: Model 69

His link works for me! You can always go to the home page of Smith and Wesson and search for Model 69.

 

[Thursday]

Shut up s&w and take my money!

Seriously though two days ago I was set on my next purchase being the 500. Then I read the 66 was being brought back and have debated that over the 500 since. Then I wondered if I maybe wanted a model 60. Now this? A 44 mag in a L frame? I hope all these models stay around long enough for me to get my funds together. I suppose I do have several plastic semis that I bought early on that don't get shot anymore since discovering revolvers that could help fund these.

 

[nawilson]

Dang you, S&W Marketing Dept! I was just thinking that the only newer gun I wanted was a 4" 629. Now, the Model 69 has my attention. Granted, a 3" barrel would be better, but 4.25" isn't too bad. I can still conceal it.

 

[ladder13]

Glad to see them coming out with new models, it's a positive.

 

[Thursday]

What's everyone's thoughts on a L frame holding up to a steady diet of 44 mags?

 

[RonS]

The L frame was a pretty late development, since the gun it replaced cracked, I think they over engineered it a bit.

 

[KLYDE]

Thanks DR505 for the link.

I don't think I'm on board with this. While the intent is good they just can't nail the complete package. To me there is no major advantage to this gun over a 4" 629. If the Factory is marketing this as a carry gun than do it right with fixed sights. Or like the Mountain Guns give it a tapered barrel.

My 21-4 TR is the slickest handling gun I own. 4" tapered barrel, round butt and fixed sights. Offer this package in a stainless 5 shot L frame .44 mag and you have a WINNER. Handloaders delight. A bit warmer than specials but not full house magnums.

Oh well I was excited for a minute.

 

[tennexplorer]

Ok, one of the complaints about the 696 was its inability to handle "hotter" loads. I wonder what has happened with the 69 to fix that?

 

[RPD20]

3 inch barrel and fixed sights please!

 

[Realgunner]

There are just so many things "wrong" with it; but I want one!

 

[SLT223]

There are just so many things "wrong" with it; but I want one!

Don't feel bad. I want one just because it says ".44 Combat Magnum" on the side of it.

 

[ladder13]

My 21-4 TR is the slickest handling gun I own. 4" tapered barrel, round butt and fixed sights. Offer this package in a stainless 5 shot L frame .44 mag and you have a WINNER. Handloaders delight. A bit warmer than specials but not full house magnums.

Oh well I was excited for a minute.

I really like that idea Mike. Hey, you live in Mass, could you stop by the factory and let them know?

 

[Godandhuntingdogs]

Can't you get a smith to cut it to 3"?

 

[BLUEDOT37]

M69

Ok, one of the complaints about the 696 was its inability to handle "hotter" loads. I wonder what has happened with the 69 to fix that?

This is what I'm wondering too. What did they do to correct the barrel extension/forcing cone weakness of the 696/396?

I think (hope) other barrel length's will come later. At first glance you don't see much different between my 357NG or 329NG & the 396NG, until you compare the top frame straps & yoke thickness. The L frame is a handy size, not too big & not too small. I hope it sells well for them.

.

396NG barrel extension

 

[Sebago Son]

There may be a "PLUG" in my future...

 

[Boxhead]

This is what I'm wondering too. What did they do to correct the barrel extension/forcing cone weakness of the 696/396?

I think (hope) other barrel length's will come later. At first glance you don't see much different between my 357NG or 329NG & the 396NG, until you compare the top frame straps & yoke thickness. The L frame is a handy size, not too big & not too small. I hope it sells well for them.

.

396NG barrel extension

While I have not looked at the piece on Smith's site I would expect that the cylinder is longer hence barrel extension shorter and I would not be surprised if they went the two piece barrel route to help manage this as well.

 

[KLYDE]

While I have not looked at the piece on Smith's site I would expect that the cylinder is longer hence barrel extension shorter and I would not be surprised if they went the two piece barrel route to help manage this as well.

Yes, The sales literature states it has the two piece barrel. I would think the engineers would have addressed this issue in depth during development. With all the controversy over the 696, whether real or internet hype, I think it is still a very valid question.

 

[Old Corp]

I'm holding off - waiting for the 3 shot j frame .44.

 

[J. W.]

While an interesting concept, I'd have rather seen a 6 shot L-frame 10mm. (I realize it may not be possible due to cylinder strength issues)


Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

 

[ladder13]

There may be a "PLUG" in my future...

WHAT?????? Tell me more.

 

[Engine49guy]

Model 69 ? ...but the Model 469 and 669 were 9mm automatics ?

There goes my oCd again

 

[jd70]

Ok 2 new s&w in a row really have my interest. Was looking for a 696, this might be better with the option of 44 mag loads on occasion. Is s&w finally paying attention to something other than plastic?

 

[Thursday]

Just put my name in line for one at my LGS. Hopefully we will start seeing these sooner rather than later. Not too soon though so I have time to get my funds together. Getting three S&Ws this year. 69, 66 and 500.