North Carolina trying to back up on Gun Law.

Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
2,156
Reaction score
2,976
Location
Triad Area North Carolina
Thanks to Sportymonk of another gun forum for this enlightening post information.



North Carolina Gun Law going in Reverse!!

RALEIGH, North Carolina (WTVD) -- There is a new push to repeal North Carolina's "Stand Your Ground" law.

House Bill 723, which is being called the "Gun Safety Act," is scheduled to be introduced in the General Assembly Tuesday.

It would allow a person to use deadly force in self-defense only after using every reasonable means to avoid the danger - including retreating.

The bill would also strengthen the law regarding safe storage of firearms.

Currently, there are 26 states with "stand your ground" laws, including North Carolina.

Go to link for link to the bill.

New push to repeal North Carolina's 'Stand Your Ground' law | abc11.com
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Just because some snowflake state rep or state senator introduces a bill does not mean "a state is trying to [________]." Probable passing by one or both sides, with a positive outlook from a governor, then I will take notice.
 
Legislation written straight from the Bloomberg playbook. So many wrong things in this legislation, I don't know where to begin!

Taking away/limiting your right to protect yourself and your family in your own home! Exposure to devastating criminal and civil punishment for protecting yourself,in your own home, from criminal intrusion is just the beginning of this horrible proposed law.

Compulsory insurance coverage for all gun owners! Yup, want to exercise your constitutional right to keep and bear arms, better be ready to be forced to pay an insurance company to exercise that right! Want to sell, or transfer a gun, you will need to get proof that the other person has that insurance, too, or your a criminal! This is also back-door registration and restriction of on the buying and selling of guns. What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand?!

How about the whole reciprocity law change. Don't like concealed carry, how about we legislate some onerous elements that effectively diminish people's rights to exercise their rights to bear arms across state lines. Again, back door legislation designed to restrict people from exercising their 2nd amendment rights. They want to make it more difficult to carry, have less people doing it.

How about that "gun violence restraining order" law! Man, that won't be used to abuse gun ownership, will it! Some good old fashioned gun confiscation is always such a juicy target for these gun grabbing, people-controlling types! Let's use some hype, hysteria, and a some tragic examples to set the stage for gun confiscation based on someone's accusations. How about demanding true due process when wanting to take away constitutional rights! I'm 100% positive that there are situations where this is necessary, but let's not provide a carte blanche, loosely defined, legally binding method to strip rights. If this, then what's next...!

Oh, I really like the proposed law to exercise economic assault on firearms manufacturers by requiring the state to divest any of its funds/holdings in these companies. Targeting legally operating companies because they do not fit in your political ideology does not mean it's right, or legal.

Don't get me started on the magazine capacity law proposal. But, I do love it when they exempt an "agency, department, or agency" of the state, or federal government. Takes some of the heat/opposition away from this infringement. You have no idea how important this component is to the gun grabbers, they cannot afford to take on opposition from government agencies. So, divide and conquer is always easier... I realize law enforcement needs large capacity mags, support this 100%. What I'm saying is that if they need them, then why shouldn't a citizen also be allowed them? We live in the same world, and are often exposed to similar dangers. If I can't carry a police officer with their large capacity magazine with me, I should be able to carry a large capacity magazine. Plus, this is supposed to be government for the people, by the people... We all need to stand together for our rights, and be vocal for ALL of us.

There's so much more to this Bloomberg blue print of proposed law changes. But, I've said enough. Please get involved in this.

All North Carolina gun owners, and other residents that care about individual freedoms, need to call and write their state representatives to oppose this over-reaching, unconstitutional, and largely unnecessary legislation.

This means you, please do not be passive and think that somebody else will engage. You must engage, and be vocal. People behind these laws rely on people not getting involved to get these bills passed.

It's easy to Google your state rep's name, phone number, email and mailing addresses. Also, contact any of the reps in leadership positions, even if they are not your district representatives, they need to hear your voice. Be polite, be direct, and be firm that you expect them to oppose this proposal. Thank you!
 
I agree that this legislation most likely won't go anywhere due to the party that still holds majority in the state house.

But, it is still important to be vocal. Make a quick call, write a quick email, it's easy. Let them know that you're paying attention. You'd be surprised how few people engage, this is the problem! By taking action to engage your elected officials, it puts the 'silent majority' out into the fray, and reminds our elected officials to be vigilant, for us!
 
It would be a shame if NC should go down that road. I agree that currently it's not likely.
 
The bill has been introduced and has not come up for first reading and assignment. I predict it will be referred to the Rules Committee to "lie upon the table."
 
Just because some **** state rep or state senator introduces a bill does not mean "a state is trying to [________]."

This is exactly right. The two primary sponsors for this garbage bill are Representatives Verla Insko and Mary Price "Pricey" Harrison. I'm not seeing any other North Carolina legislators who have attached their names to this travesty. I believe the legislators realize there is so much junk in this bill that to associate themselves with it would be a huge black mark on their political career in this state. There's so much garbage in this bill, the landfill wouldn't have room for it all.

Also, it looks as if just about every story about this begins with: "There is a new push to repeal North Carolina's "Stand Your Ground" law."

Well, there is no "push", old or new. That's just sensationalistic reporting on the part of some NC media outlets.They're quoting from a generic legislative handout.They may as well have copied it off some office bulletin board in Raleigh. This is simply a poor and blatant attempt at shotgun legislation on the part of a couple of legislators who are insecure about their own identities and their own relevance on the North Carolina political scene. Frankly, I'd never heard of these two before this morning.

It doesn't appear that either one of them has ever heard the expression, "A snowball's chance in Hell".

waving-gadsden-tea-party-flag_zps7ed2b680.gif%7Eoriginal
 
Should be renamed the "Violent Perpetrators Protection Act" because that's in effect what it really is. Hopefully this will die in committee and never reach the floor. Another example of the piecemeal attack of citizens' rights to protect themselves at the state level in light of the failure of the national effort.
 
This is exactly right. The two primary sponsors for this garbage bill are Representatives Verla Insko and Mary Price "Pricey" Harrison. I'm not seeing any other North Carolina legislators who have attached their names to this travesty. I believe the legislators realize there is so much junk in this bill that to associate themselves with it would be a huge black mark on their political career in this state. There's so much garbage in this bill, the landfill wouldn't have room for it all.

Also, it looks as if just about every story about this begins with: "There is a new push to repeal North Carolina's "Stand Your Ground" law."

Well, there is no "push", old or new. That's just sensationalistic reporting on the part of some NC media outlets.They're quoting from a generic legislative handout.They may as well have copied it off some office bulletin board in Raleigh. This is simply a poor and blatant attempt at shotgun legislation on the part of a couple of legislators who are insecure about their own identities and their own relevance on the North Carolina political scene. Frankly, I'd never heard of these two before this morning.

It doesn't appear that either one of them has ever heard the expression, "A snowball's chance in Hell".

waving-gadsden-tea-party-flag_zps7ed2b680.gif%7Eoriginal

The bill is still open for sponsors to sign on. As of now there are five. Harrison, Insko, Fisher, Cunningham and Floyd. All of the same political persuasion and all from major metro areas.
 
The bill has been introduced and has not come up for first reading and assignment. I predict it will be referred to the Rules Committee to "lie upon the table."

Passed first reading (which is simply a formality) and then:

"Ref to the Com on Judiciary I, if favorable, RULES, Calendar, and Operations of the House"

Its DOA
 
Wrong Title for This Thread

"North Carolina trying to back up on Gun Law."

Let me set the record straight on this thread's title and this proposed legislation.

No, North Carolina...the state...is not trying to back up on any gun laws.A bill was introduced earlier this month by two misinformed and misguided legislators. Several more equally uneducated legislators signed on as co-sponsors.

Even the two main sponsors of this bill, Mary Harrison (D) and Verla Insko (D) have publicly admitted/stated that they know the bill has little or no chance of becoming law. I have my own ideas as to why they introduced this bill, but can't get into that here.

So to reiterate...and make it perfectly clear...this isn't the state doing this. It isn't the gun owners, collectors, and sportsmen of this fine state who are doing this. I'm pretty confident in saying that none of us want anything to do with this bill and all of us find it totally ridiculous.

Regarding this proposed bill's status, it was sent to the Judiciary Committee on April 11. It's still sitting there on someone's desk. I doubt it's going anywhere soon.

Trying to back up? Nope. We're still moving forward with proposed legislation that is pro-Second Amendment.
cheers.gif
 
There is a representative in Charlotte that is always proposing these scat laws. With the makeup of the legislature it will go nowhere.

Oooops, I see it wasn't her this time, but two progressives out of Raleigh. There are so many Yankees around Raleigh it is no surprise.

The only thing standing in our way now is the dem governor, hopefully they have enough votes to override a veto on the CC constitutional carry bill.
 
Last edited:
There is a representative in Charlotte that is always proposing these scat laws.

Who are you referring to? It's okay to name names on this forum when you're talking about legislators who are pro-2A or anti-2A, as long as you don't refer to them in an offensive or derogatory manner.

Oooops, I see it wasn't her this time, but two progressives out of Raleigh. There are so many Yankees around Raleigh it is no surprise.

There are a lot of transplants in the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill area, mostly because of all the good paying tech jobs in and around the Triangle. Regarding people from up north, the two legislators who introduced the bill are from Arkansas and Greensboro...hardly what I'd call "Yankees".

The only thing standing in our way now is the governor...

Well, no...Roy Cooper isn't the only thing standing in our way. Proposed pro-gun bills have to get out of committee, then make it to the governor's desk. The most recent pro-gun bills are still languishing in committee.

As I mentioned in another post, maybe even in another thread, proposed firearms bills aren't high on the legislature's list of priorities, and probably won't be for the remainder of the session. Sad, but true.
 
While it's likely that this bill will just go to a committee to die a quiet death, it's never safe to assume that will happen.

The best way to make sure that it does happen is for residents of the state to write to their legislators and ask them to kill the bill.

Left to themselves, legislators will go with the path of least resistance. If a lot of people write to support a bill, they will vote for it. If a lot of people write to oppose a bill, they will oppose it.

If you write, email, or call, the first thing that is going to happen is someone on their staff is going to see if you are registered to vote. If you aren't, your email or letter goes into the trash. You'll get a polite reply over the phone, but that will be forgotten as soon as you hang up.

Do with that as you will.

The bill has been introduced and has not come up for first reading and assignment. I predict it will be referred to the Rules Committee to "lie upon the table."
 
While it's likely that this bill will just go to a committee to die a quiet death, it's never safe to assume that will happen.

The majority of gun owners, sportsmen, and collectors do not assume anything of the sort when it comes to anti-gun legislation in North Carolina. Although we have fairly good (but somewhat quirky) gun laws on the books here, we are not complacent.

The best way to make sure that it does happen is for residents of the state to write to their legislators and ask them to kill the bill.

We're up to date on all the methods of working against anti-gun/anti-2A legislation in North Carolina.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top