It bothered me...so I called Customer Service and relayed my concerns to them. I was told that its PERFECTLY normal and that if the barrel is "clocked" past center or canted...that is because it was the BEST position to lock the barrel for accuracy.
The technique of clocking the barrel so the revolver shoots approximately to point-of-aim is as old as the hills and was/is perfectly normal, particularly with fixed-sight guns.
All revolvers torque off one way or the other when discharged, owing mainly to the reaction of the gun to the bullet encountering the twist of the rifling, I am told. Minor adjustments for that, and accounting for various small errors in manufacturing (which "stack-up"), may require slight adjustments in fitting the barrel, but I agree it should not be so pronounced that it is obnoxious. Just what is considered obnoxious is going to differ from shooter to shooter, and the factory is of course contending with the duty of trying to satisfy some people who may regard their revolver more as a work of art, rather than the useful weapon it was designed and manufactured to be.
This is all nothing new. I have 44 Magnums from all of the early "eras" ('50s-'60s-'70s) that have barrels clocked slightly the the left (from the shooter's view), on some guns more noticeable than on others. And it was going on 100-years or more before that. The internet has something of a genius for ignoring the obvious on this topic.
If the gun doesn't suit and one doesn't want to be bothered with asking the factory to adjust it, why buy it? Buy another gun and save any possible agonizing.

If buying over the web, I am one of those Snowman refers to who will not even consider buying a revolver without some kind of inspection provision. In most cases, it is just unreasonable for the seller to assume a buyer can know enough about the gun from a few photographs. I am suspicious of any seller who is not confident enough of his gun and his description of it that he refuses to allow inspection/right-to-return.