Roller Delayed
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 161
Why would George Soros be judging my mental condition?Would you feel comfortable with Ruth bader Ginsberg judging your mental condition ? Or maybe George Soros ? Crazy people will always be with us . If I have to deal with one I prefer and will be armed . It’s purely a matter of when to call 911 . I prefer to make the call after situation is in hand .
The hearing is where credible witnesses and mental health or LE professionals present evidence of intent to harm, and the judge decides whether that evidence meets the letter of the law.
What if someone lies? Criminal penalties.
What if the judge is anti-gun? They still have to make a written argument for their decision, which will get them disbarred if they keep going against the law.
What if mental health workers lie? Lawsuit, loss of license.
What if LE lies? Well, they sometimes do already, but what is their motivation? Are cops widely anti-gun?
There isn't a slippery slope here where all gun owners are going to be on a 12 month renewable firearms hold. The court system isn't large enough for that and the police don't have that kind of storage. Abuses are possible, but that is true for every part of the justice system, and this law is poorly set up for wide-spread abuse because of all of its bureaucracy.
I'm not really trying to advocate for this law as much as explain it. Some of the things being said really don't make much sense in the greater context of how the justice system has always worked. It isn't like any of you are concerned about the travesty of pre-trial confinement - which takes a lot more of your liberty than just guns without facing your accusers.
Last edited: