S&W 669 9mm

DeafSmith

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
1,556
Location
USA
Well at a pawn shop they have a pretty good condition S&W 669 9mm. He offered $400 OTD.. but I'm rather broke now... oh well..

Looks like this:

1757689141173.webp

Say how accurate was these guns? I have the 3913, 3914, and a 6906 but not the earlier 669.

I presume it uses the same mags as the 6906.

Thanks.
 
Register to hide this ad
My 669 came with the appropriate 2nd gen magazines but your 3rd gen 6906 mags work just fine. That's a really decent price and it would be a nice introduction to 2nd gen guns. You'll likely prefer the grip and sights of the 6906 but a lot can be said about that "old school cool" factor of the 669.
Mine had been machined for Novak night sights and likes the 59 series magazines with the PGS adapter.

Todd
 

Attachments

  • 669.webp
    669.webp
    678.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 20211120_1702271.webp
    20211120_1702271.webp
    292 KB · Views: 0
Accuracy will vary from one firearm to the next, but the 469/669 introduced the fixed barrel bushing in S&W pistols. As such, they tended to be more accurate than many of the 39/x39 and 59/x59 pistols with the removable barrel bushing. I would expect the average 469 or 669 to be as accurate as the average 6904 or 6906.
 
469/669 are great guns and shoot every bit as well and accurately as your 6906. The sights on the 469/669 are the short fall.

The front sight is integral to the slide, and the rear sight is not cut for Novak sights. They are still great guns, but that price seems kind of high. The second gen mini's usually come in cheaper than third gen's because of the sights.. that said, there are still some good deals to be had..
 
Last edited:
My 669 had accuracy issues, after 2 magazines the holes started to cloverleaf instead of the same hole like the first and second magazine.......

Randy
 
I bought one when they first came out and still have it in my safe. It was billed at that time as "A Minigun".
One thing the magazine testers wrote was that it could manually cycle empty shells to show its reliability to feed anything.
I tried it and it worked.
I really liked that gun and will never sell it. But smaller and lighter guns came along.
 
I believe that it was a 39 that I bought, when it first came out. Gorgeous bluing and it didn't malfunction, but I couldn't hardly hit anything I shot at with it. COULD have been me, or I just could have got a dog
 
If the OP's photo is the actual gun in the shop, that should have gone home at $400. Perhaps it could be negotiated down a little in the pawn shop. $400 is a great amount. I carry a 469 every day and it's a great gun.
 
I have a 669, 3913, 6906. All exc+. Purchase is fast, 3913 fastest, like p225, double stack is a might slower, as usual. All are very accurate, parts abound (except frames). Alloy is 6075, so type 3 anodizing will be champagne colored, but HARD. (my refreshed 3913 is shown). 6906 color is OEM for comparison (type 2 anodizing). Each of these has 3000 rounds through them each. These are training guns, hence colored nomenclature for students to see.20250913_101558.webp20250913_101605.webp20250913_101802.webp20250913_101808.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: -dW
I love 3rd Gen S&W hand guns. Always wanted a 2nd Gen probably a 669 but as for now not yet. Here's my 908s, 910s (S&W value line of the 3913 & 5906) 4006, 4516, and early year model 1911. Love and shoot all of them and will never part with them. Each one is extremely reliable, never once a fail to feed, fail to fire, not one hiccup ever.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0947.webp
    IMG_0947.webp
    579.2 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_0948.webp
    IMG_0948.webp
    521.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: -dW
Back
Top