Dutchdiamondback
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 2
Folks, pull out a sixpack and a cigar and brew on this one.
I read all the halleluja's about the S & W M&P 15-22.
You guys all love it. My main concern is the markings on the gun. And then particularly the own that says S and W.
* what the h... Is that guy on hollands nr. 1 export product or what...? *
Now, that isn't such a strange thought on THE Smith & Wesson forum. Guy droppin' in like a fly on a dry heap of BS and already flamin' S & W... One can only expect Staffmembers searching for the banhammer at this time.
Allow me to introduce myself: Dutchdiamondback, writing to you from the most beautiful country of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands ( as the one in Europe , that great nation to the west of that other german thingy) sportshooter, Colt-afficionado ( now if that ain't a give-away... ) and lurking around for a tac .22 for a dynamic form of sport shooting called Dynamic Service Rifle which is a rather popular form of sportshooting in the Netherlands. Oh - and before I forget - not loaded with cash or I would have opted for a .223 (5.56) AR-15.
Having introduced myself I am going to - as we say in the Netherlands - throw the bat in the chickenshed.
I'm about to wonder off to the dark side. I have a Colt Diamondback .22 LR, a Colt Python . 357 Magnum, a Colt New Service Model Ace .22 LR and "Big Momma", Colt Anaconda in .44 Magnum. All Colts and well - let's just quote the late Charlton Heston- : From my cold dead hands. Since my search in the Netherlands for a Colt SAA have been futile I'm opting for another Colt legend - the AR-15.
* colt-afficionado, eh? Why don't you get the Umarex? That has got at least a tiny piece of the markings right? *
Right...
I maybe mentally instable because of a severe case of Coltitus, but me ain't stupid. And I'm not going to bore y'all to death by writing down all the cons ( must be a pro somewhere but still can't find it...) between the Smith and the Walther/Umarex/Colt.
In short - here's the challenge for you all:
I am going to ask you lot to tell me why NOT to buy the Smith & Wesson M & P 15 -22. Tell me all about the bad quality, the FTF's the FTE's, the unaccuracy, the ones that blew-up in your face: let's play the be honest game here.
It can't be that good, can it?
I read all the halleluja's about the S & W M&P 15-22.
You guys all love it. My main concern is the markings on the gun. And then particularly the own that says S and W.
* what the h... Is that guy on hollands nr. 1 export product or what...? *
Now, that isn't such a strange thought on THE Smith & Wesson forum. Guy droppin' in like a fly on a dry heap of BS and already flamin' S & W... One can only expect Staffmembers searching for the banhammer at this time.
Allow me to introduce myself: Dutchdiamondback, writing to you from the most beautiful country of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands ( as the one in Europe , that great nation to the west of that other german thingy) sportshooter, Colt-afficionado ( now if that ain't a give-away... ) and lurking around for a tac .22 for a dynamic form of sport shooting called Dynamic Service Rifle which is a rather popular form of sportshooting in the Netherlands. Oh - and before I forget - not loaded with cash or I would have opted for a .223 (5.56) AR-15.
Having introduced myself I am going to - as we say in the Netherlands - throw the bat in the chickenshed.
I'm about to wonder off to the dark side. I have a Colt Diamondback .22 LR, a Colt Python . 357 Magnum, a Colt New Service Model Ace .22 LR and "Big Momma", Colt Anaconda in .44 Magnum. All Colts and well - let's just quote the late Charlton Heston- : From my cold dead hands. Since my search in the Netherlands for a Colt SAA have been futile I'm opting for another Colt legend - the AR-15.
* colt-afficionado, eh? Why don't you get the Umarex? That has got at least a tiny piece of the markings right? *
Right...
I maybe mentally instable because of a severe case of Coltitus, but me ain't stupid. And I'm not going to bore y'all to death by writing down all the cons ( must be a pro somewhere but still can't find it...) between the Smith and the Walther/Umarex/Colt.
In short - here's the challenge for you all:
I am going to ask you lot to tell me why NOT to buy the Smith & Wesson M & P 15 -22. Tell me all about the bad quality, the FTF's the FTE's, the unaccuracy, the ones that blew-up in your face: let's play the be honest game here.
It can't be that good, can it?
Last edited: