SIG P320 Discharges?

Will the questions continue to be asked every time some has an accidental discharge because the neglected to recognize the primary safety for every gun is the same? Of course I mean keeping your finger clear of the trigger guard until your sights are on target.
That principle certainly applies... however, the trigger finger (and trigger finger discipline) being the primary safety is relevant to MECHANICALLY SOUND guns. Safe handling and trigger finger discipline becomes a moot point if the gun in question was poorly engineered and it has so much slop in it that the striker can slip off the sear by other means besides the trigger being pulled. The whole point of this thread is the gun allegedly firing without fingers being anywhere close to the trigger. In multiple P320 AD videos I've seen, the gun was holstered and the person carrying it did not have their hands near the trigger. If something inside the holster caused it to fire while a person was simply moving around, then it's still a schitt design for being that damn sensitive and isn't suited to duty use.
 
This is interesting.

SIG has lost 2 cases in court and is appealing. They won and settled others. The Army, Navy, and Marine Corps have not "grounded" the M17/18 despite several accidents with injuries. They have passed (and continue to pass) DOD (regular LAT/lot acceptance testing), and CA DOJ safety tests (the M18 is on the approved handgun roster there).

View attachment 780526

When the M9 slides were failing (6 in service, 12 in testing) Beretta sued the government for defamation in court and won. The government had to pay for the M9 slide modifications, not Beretta. DOD went on to buy about 200,000 more pistols in follow on contracts to the original 300,000 pistol contact.

I suppose SIG is hoping their lawyers are as good as Beretta's were.

Did I trust my M9? Yes. As I trusted my M15, M1911A1, and M11. Would I trust an M18? No. Good thing I'm retired.
Beretta won in court because the issued ammo in the tests by the SEALs was +p+ level power. They also broke 2 Sig 226 slides, but for some weird reason those never get mentioned. As soon as the slides broke the Army rushed out and proclaimed the M9 as junk and defamed Beretta when it turned out to be the fault of the government. At least 3 of the services have the M17/18 under review.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7427.jpeg
    IMG_7427.jpeg
    206.8 KB · Views: 0
It's my understanding that Glock lost 4 contracts from the military and this is about when the reports started coming in about the defective P320, After Sig got the contracts. This was told to me by a defensive trainer here in Jacksonville who uses exclusively Sigs for his carry.
The you tube videos on the net seem to contradict that along with all the stories you can read. I don't use the Sig brand anymore but it wasn't due to this issue. I think I'll just keep my booger hook off the bang switch.
 
Back
Top