cmj8591
Member
I'm sorry but that sounds a bit like the logic anti-gun people use. Yes, you are a pervert to want a child sex doll but to automatically make the leap that the owner of one would violate a child is a bit like saying gun owners will eventually murder someone.
What people do behind closed doors is none of my business so long as it doesn't hurt anyone. And if it's none of my business, it's none of the government's business either. Do child molesters deserve the death penalty? In extreme cases, yes. Does someone molesting a Barbie doll deserve the same? I don' thin so Lucy!
When we start legislating what inanimate objects a person can have based on how we think people should behave, we start heading down a slippery slope from which there is no return. No matter how repulsive you think it may be, the thought process which drives this kind of thing can be applied to any object. If we adopt that thought process, what stops them from applying it to religious items or artistic expression? And this is even worse because it seeks to control what someone does in private. No matter what you might think about this, it needs to be challenged. Back in the pre woke day, the ACLU would have been all over it. You are right, This smells like the whole anti gun toy gun argument.