Nor that we are the pinnacle of knowledge. Check back in 1,000 years ;-)
Naw, I think I'll just hang around for the next 1,000 years and watch

Nor that we are the pinnacle of knowledge. Check back in 1,000 years ;-)
This seems to be a classic case of stating something as fact and
then searching for only those things that confirm this.
As far as reincarnation, there has never been a documented case where an outside objective proof was found.
Sounds like Tuckers religious beliefs he is trying to prove, so much for that. Childern can be coached to say about anything if they think it pleases the adult.
The Leininger's story has zero evidence except what they them-selves claim. And they write a book to profit from this story. Could they have embellished these claims just to make a few bucks. Greed maybe involved??
Bottom line is Tucker and Leiningers have Zero (0) objective
proof of any of their claims. Believe what you want but please
have a rational reason for doing so.
.
Fast forward to last week, ....
When there is ever one true documented case of paranormal activity you will see it in the typical large red letters, BREAKING NEWS, on your tv screen. I'm not going to hold my breath.
That's called "confirmation bias", but what you're claiming is contempt prior to investigation. The Leininger story goes well beyond confirmation bias, and you would know if you studied what Dr. Tucker and others know and the parent's story.
Obviously you are being silly and have not studied this closely. You're acting as if you're an authority on the topic but you clearly are not. For all you reading this, Old Arkansawyer obviously hasn't read the Leininger's book or Tucker's books on the subject. If he did, he didn't read them carefully and is suffering from his own confirmation bias. But my money is on him never reading any of them. He obviously has a problem with the concept of reincarnation and is being a naysayer.
One should never underestimate the determination of people to believe what they want to believe despite any and all evidence to the contrary.
Do you or anyone else know of any evidence to the contrary regarding the James Leininger story, for example? If so, I'd love to hear it if you do and I am not being facetious.
That said, people often like to say things like "people are just going to believe what they want to believe," and that certainly IS true, but many don't realize when they are on the wrong side of truth when they express that notion.
Between the documented, catalogued & coded cases of children with past life memories and NDEs (Near Death Experiences), the evidence that our consciousness survives after the physical death of our bodies is so overwhelming now that just in the past ten years or so the onus is now on skeptics to disprove these things. If that sounds like a strong statement, and it is, people need to merely research the evidence properly.
It is important to realize our court system does not require proof for a reason. It only requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, and this is necessary because you can play the skeptic about anything.
In fact, we'd never settle any matters in court if we required "proof" because we can always come up with some kind of argument against ANY case. We can even claim we're not really standing or sitting here right now, and that's why it is important to keep in mind that virtually everything you and I believe is only based on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt rather than fact (and many times we don't even have reasonableness to cling to).
In matters concerning what we're talking about here (life after death & reincarnation), when you weigh the preponderance of evidence in favor of children's past lives and NDE's, according to the department head of the University of Virginia's Division of Perceptual studies, we now have compelling scientific evidence of our consciousness surviving outside of and beyond our physical existence.
Again, I'm not claiming there is absolute "proof" of our consciousness surviving our physical death—there is no such proof of even the existence of viruses [if you doubt this, read virologist Stefan Lanka), but there is so much evidence supporting the phenomenon now that it is silly to dismiss it.
No one, including me, should state that the survival of consciousness is "fact", but certainly anyone dismissing the claim out of hand has not been scrutinizing the evidence in my opinion.
The Good Book says "Absent from the body present with the Lord". Doesn't say anything about lingering on, Haints or reincarnation.