To clarify:
House was estate sale, so I had no knowledge of damage. A very large houseplant (300-400#) had sat in the same location for years. Water from the plant seeped through and destroyed a circle of the carpet below. The inspector was extremely thorough but there was no way he could have known, nor could I, without bringing furniture movers.
Sale was "as-is". I accepted this offer specifically because of this detail. I lived in a different state and wasn't interested in long-distance toilet repairs.
To me, as-is means take it or leave it in current condition.
Since it was an estate, I had only cursory knowledge of the homes condition so I couldn't make any guarantees.
To my recollection, there were NO items in the inspection report to question so the buyer created the following four categories, and asked for $1,500 per category:
Miscellaneous electrical
Miscellaneous plumbing
Skylight replacement (fully functional-but dated)
Patio repair (also fully functional and not a structural issue)
At the time, this felt like extortion. I know I could have said no or negotiated the amounts down, but the total amount ($6,000) was insignificant to the purchase price of the home and I wanted to get the property sold.
LATER, when I learned of the carpet issue, is when I chose to do nothing about this cosmetic defect. Had they not held me up for $6,000, I would have voluntarily given a credit appropriate to cover replacement of the carpet. Would have been easy to do as I had just re-carpeted many other rooms in the house so I knew the cost per square yard.
Sorry for the rant, 5 years later and this is still a touchy subject to me.
Well, $6K on a $350,000 house is one thing, $6K on a $100,000 house is another. Throw in a mortgage to be paid off on the property, and . . .