You know, you're entitled to your opinion and deciding whether or not you want to own any particular firearm.
It's just that other folks are similarly entitled.
S&W engineers decided that the trigger return spring on the Sigma Series and M&P Series pistols provide for a better service life when fitted with a fiber buffer.
Colt feels likewise about their extractor spring, but they use different densities of plastic.
FWIW, I remember when Wolff first developed the Trigger Conversion Unit for the Beretta Model 92/96 Series pistols. They did so to resolve a trigger spring breakage problem that was observed in some .40 Berettas being used with the hard recoiling 155gr JHP load favored by one large fed LE agency. They use a steel insert.
This is a review of some info from their webstite:
"This product was developed at the request of INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service), the largest federal law enforcement agency in the country, to solve the problem of trigger spring breakage in their duty weapons. Now, after more than a year of development and tens of thousands of rounds of punishing testing by INS and Wolff Gunsprings, we are pleased top make this available to everyone."
More info can be found at their website looking under the Beretta section in Pistol section. http://www.gunsprings.com/1ndex.html
I was told by a couple of folks from Glock that they changed the way their springs are hardened to try and extend the service life of their trigger springs.
Different strokes.
You can choose to like/dislike anything in whatever manner pleases you, you know. There are a lot of products from which to choose, after all ...
It's just that other folks are similarly entitled.
S&W engineers decided that the trigger return spring on the Sigma Series and M&P Series pistols provide for a better service life when fitted with a fiber buffer.
Colt feels likewise about their extractor spring, but they use different densities of plastic.
FWIW, I remember when Wolff first developed the Trigger Conversion Unit for the Beretta Model 92/96 Series pistols. They did so to resolve a trigger spring breakage problem that was observed in some .40 Berettas being used with the hard recoiling 155gr JHP load favored by one large fed LE agency. They use a steel insert.
This is a review of some info from their webstite:
"This product was developed at the request of INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service), the largest federal law enforcement agency in the country, to solve the problem of trigger spring breakage in their duty weapons. Now, after more than a year of development and tens of thousands of rounds of punishing testing by INS and Wolff Gunsprings, we are pleased top make this available to everyone."
More info can be found at their website looking under the Beretta section in Pistol section. http://www.gunsprings.com/1ndex.html
I was told by a couple of folks from Glock that they changed the way their springs are hardened to try and extend the service life of their trigger springs.
Different strokes.
You can choose to like/dislike anything in whatever manner pleases you, you know. There are a lot of products from which to choose, after all ...
Last edited: