You can't have it both ways.
How so? Please elaborate, as I'm uncertain what exactly the "can't have your cake and eat it too" reference is being made to.
I don't want another AWB and I hope it doesn't happen.
Neither do I, but be that as it may wishful thinking isn't going to accomplish much, unfortunately.
But if you're saying stats just support most HD situations involve only a few shots fired, then you're giving ammunition to the opposition, who continually ask "why" mags need to be over 10 rounds.
I can't say for sure one way or another whether the "stats" support either premise, but quite frankly I don't have the time to properly scrutinize the statistics bandied by either side and feel it's better spent on addressing other facets of the "debate." If studies like the one at FactCheck.org are any indication, both players appear to be guilty of "fudging the numbers."
I have an AR and love it, but the AR is FAR more capable of raining a shower of lead down on someone than a bolt or lever action gun are.
I don't shoot an AR to "spray bullets," or as one version of the old adage goes: "One hit is firepower. A hundred misses are just noise." Using it to "rain a shower of lead down on someone" not only constitutes improper use of the tool but also plays into the hands of those who seek to ban them.
You would also be surprised by the cadence at which a Lee-Enfield or Winchester 1894 can be fired in the hands of a disciplined shooter.