The 2d Amendment to the US Constitution does NOT qualify. Open carry or concealed carry should not be regulated. Additionally, since the US Constitution is the "law of the land", there should be no ban on universal carry by any state in the union.

You are wrong. Federal courts and SCOTUS have stated in case law that the government can regulate firearms, so the regulation of firearms is constitutional. Federal courts (not sure about SCOTUS I have to read Bruin again) have stated that either concealed carry has to be allowed outside of the home and/or open carry, but banning both is unconstitutional.

The U.S. constitution gives the Federal courts and ultimately SCOTUS the power to rule on merits of what's constitutional and what's not. You can't have it both ways. Claim to be pro-Constitution and then also be against the Combat.

Gun owners will continue to lose every right they have due to eating their own.
This thread is a perfect example.

If you don't like open carry, that is spectacular just don't do it, then shut up and move along as you will not change anyone's mind with your science fiction horror stories.

Articles have been written about criminals being caught (waffle house in GA about a decade ago, comes to mind) where they waited to rob a business due to open carriers inside, after the ocer left the cops caught the criminal as they were entering. Not to mention the articles NOT written because the criminal left and nobody knew, but hey those all must be lies because the experts here say it NEVER happens.

I have to exit this train wreck before I say what I really think and get banned.

Pretty simple isn’t it? But another of these well worn out threads will pop up in the near future.

__________________
Just another brick in the wall