Sebago Son
Member
... answer the question, move on and I will not post into this thread any longer.
Don't threaten me with peace and quiet...
... and what about my cannon?
... answer the question, move on and I will not post into this thread any longer.
The reason for the 2nd Amendment was to have an armed populace as a preventative measure against the Government becoming repressive and tyrannical.
That can't be done with a single shot .22
You have no further excuse for continuing to ask, unless you truly are a troll.
this is just wrong, maybe you need to look around your surroundings and figure out that the middle red states do not support the east and west coast blue states. I am still just wanting to know the main desire and fascination with them, why do you own one? answer the question, move on and I will not post into this thread any longer.
.357 Magnum but will shoot a 38 special round which is 1/3 rd the price.Better go look again. There is no .38 Special Magnum. Your a
hard learner. It could have been done with ANY semi automatic firearm.
BTW, I own shotguns that cost more than some people's homes. As long as they don't effect them, your ok with more restrictions? Kind of, it dosen't effect me, so why should I care?
And, it's not an AR/AK. It was a Bushmaster AR-15. Have one of those, too. Mine hasn't bothered any one yet, but I pet it regularly. I used an M-16 in the service. (mine was a CAR). My dad used an M1. (WWII) My grandfather, an 03A3. (WWI) I have a pair of Great Great Great Great Grandfathers (one on each side of the Civil War) they used period arms. (I still have
ones 12mm pin fire pistol) I'm assuming by your post that you did not serve. Which is OK. Maybe if you had, you'd have a better understanding of why some of us take this freedom and liberty thing seriously.
so I guess you do not believe the constitution to be an ad hoc document (subject to change iudnk) but something concrete and not open to interpretation.
so I guess you do not believe the constitution to be an ad hoc document (subject to change iudnk) but something concrete and not open to interpretation.
By the way,
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to law and regulations. So help me God.
this is just wrong, maybe you need to look around your surroundings and figure out that the middle red states do not support the east and west coast blue states. I am still just wanting to know the main desire and fascination with them, why do you own one? answer the question, move on and I will not post into this thread any longer.
Don't threaten me with peace and quiet...
... and what about my cannon?
By the way,
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to law and regulations. So help me God.
you plan on sinking a battle ship?....![]()
you plan on sinking a battle ship?....![]()
SUBJECT TO CHANGE? You are detestable.
so I guess you do not believe the constitution to be an ad hoc document (subject to change iudnk) but something concrete and not open to interpretation.
like a lawyer type of detestable or a legislative type of detestable?
No it's is not subject to change, otherwise it would called the List of Really Good Suggestions that do not mean jack. Interpretation yes, by SCOTUS etc, as long as a strict interpretation is applied. The only people I know who think it's fluid are Traitors, Communists and Moonbats.
It's people like you who open the door to evil and oppression.
like a lawyer type of detestable or a legislative type of detestable?