I just realized I've never even held a N frame.....

ABPOS

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
2,230
Location
SE Wisconsin
Much less shot one. I hear people talk about them not fitting their hands and now I really want to find out for myself. I have medium sized hands. I'm not a tall guy but I've seen bigger guys then me have stubbier fingers. I don't struggle with the trigger on an M9, although if it was much bigger I might.

I do find my model 19 to be a very good dimension.

I only care cuz I've got an expensive rifle up for sale and I said I'd consider partial trades. But the only thing I'm interested in are Smith and Wesson Revolvers. And I got to thinking about what I would like. And of course an M1917 comes to mind or a 38/44.

I also want another J or K frame so there's that. Anyways.....

I've been hanging around here for a while. I only own a Model 19 and a 442. And a detective Special. But I would love to own several Smith revolvers. I don't have a lot of money so even though I'm kind of obsessed with these beautiful guns, I have way less experience than I'd like to. Plus, honestly, in all my range trips, there has not been a lot of people that I run into that shoot Smith Revolvers. The last time I did, a guy had a lot of them but no N frames that I recall.

We don't have many pawn shops around here and I don't think I've ever seen a N frame at my LGS. I guess I need to remedy this situation. LOL. You know, I need to double check my LGS. They have a range there where they rent guns and they carry Smith revolvers. I wonder if they have a 325 or 625 or something to rent. I think they might now that I'm thinking of it.

Can you feel my pain? LOL.
 
Register to hide this ad
I think you need an M28! Semi affordable (if you hurry) and just pure fun to shoot even with 357 mag. Go git you one!

5f6bcac065e66c54efb8bd38633e9009.jpg
 
I'll second this. Using an N-frame shooting even the hottest 357 magnum loads is comfortable. Totally different experience than shooting a 357 K-frame

I'll agree too. I much prefer shooting full house loads from my m28 than I do from my 586 or m19. A frame that weighs more equals less felt recoil, at least for me.
When you pick up an N frame you know you've picked up a real handgun.
 

Attachments

  • model28-5.jpg
    model28-5.jpg
    135.7 KB · Views: 91
Last edited:
I suppose a persons hand size might make shooting a n frame difficult but you would have to have pretty small hands. Personally I wear XL gloves and a size 13 ring and even a n frame with magnas is to small for me to shoot comfortably, service style stocks are just down right painful for me.
 
The actual grip size difference really isn't that much. Every now and then you will see a picture here of an N frame some one stuck a set of K frame grips on. The grips fit pretty well just the top of the grips don't quite go all the way back on the frame from just below the step in the frame up. Maybe 1/10" The N frames are also about 1/8" longer at the bottom of the frameThe N frame guns are noticeably heftier in the hand, especially the 357s because the smaller chambers and bore leave a bit more steel that the 44s and 45s. But, they do soak up recoil.

Here is a couple threads showing N and K frame grip differences

K Frame Grips on N Frame for Small Hands

Are these K frame or N frame grips? (pics)
 
Last edited:
I think the big dimension would be from the back of the frame to the trigger. If it's much longer. and also if the standard grips are much wider on an N over K. Although my K with the target grips (which are pretty wide) are just fine.

I would like a 27/28 38/44. But I also have 700 rounds of .45 just sitting there. I think I would enjoy .38 special plus p better though. Normal .38 loads feel like .22's in my 6" model 19. But it's 39 ounces.

You guys are giving me hope though. I don't think I'll have time today or tomorrow, but maybe one time this week I can get in there and see. I should rent one and shoot it. If they have an N frame there.
 
The actual grip size difference really isn't that much. Every now and then you will see a picture here of an N frame some one stuck a set of K frame grips on. The grips fit pretty well just the top of the grips don't quite go all the way back on the frame from just below the step in the frame up. Maybe 1/10" The N frames are also about 1/8" longer at the bottom of the frameThe N frame guns are noticeably heftier in the hand, especially the 357s because the smaller chambers and bore leave a bit more steel that the 44s and 45s. But, they do soak up recoil.

Here is a couple threads showing N and K frame grip differences

K Frame Grips on N Frame for Small Hands

Are these K frame or N frame grips? (pics)

Your absolutely correct about the fit N vs K. Here's a 1950 target that I bought last year that came that way. The price was right and I knew they were the wrong stocks so it didn't matter but you can clearly see they don't quite fit.
 

Attachments

  • PictureID_32.jpg
    PictureID_32.jpg
    74.1 KB · Views: 139
I can't get good finger placement on the trigger if the N-frame's grips cover the backstrap. Hogue Monogrips solved that for me. I never thought I had small hands (I can play a tenth on a piano) but I guess they must at least be mediumish.
 
When you pick up an N frame you know you've picked up a real handgun.

I like that except I'd say you picked up a real BIG handgun! They do soak up full house recoil, that's for sure, but if I had to pick just one "style" frame I'd probably take the L frame - they soak up recoil pretty well, too.

I'm basically a little guy (well, short and fat but the fat part doesn't affect my glove size!) and the stocks on N frames feel just fine. I like to add Tyler Ts to Magnas, anyway, but the jazzy elk on the Model 25 is thicker than standard magnas and is excellent - the .45 has more felt recoil to me than the .357 - maybe that's weird but it is what it is.

iscs-yoda-albums-s-and-w-revolvers-picture12683-model-27-classic.jpg


iscs-yoda-albums-s-and-w-revolvers-picture12718-m25-5-elk-grips.jpg
 
I think you need an M28! Semi affordable (if you hurry) and just pure fun to shoot even with 357 mag. Go git you one!

5f6bcac065e66c54efb8bd38633e9009.jpg

THE M28 IS AN EXCELLENT SUGGESTION. THERE IS A NOTICEABLE REDUCTION IN FELT RECOIL, WHEN SHOOTING .357 MAGNUM OUT OF AN N FRAME, VS A K/L FRAME, IMHO......

THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL SPECIMEN, KK.......
 
Don't feel like the 'Lone Virgin' @ABPOS, shot my first L Frame last weekend....Drilled and tapped my best friends m29 waaay back in the Dirty Harry days, thinking back I'm completely puzzled over never shooting it. He still has that 29....I'm gonna have him bring it over sometime and experience the awakening.

ETA: Believe I've misspoken again about the L frame....picked up a 686 a few months ago.
 
Last edited:
I've shot a Super Redhawk before. LOL. Now that's a big gun. I've even shot a Desert Eagle in .44 Magnum. Which was easy to handle. But I've never shot an N frame.

I can't recall if anyone has ever offered and I declined or not..... I'm not a big .44 magnum junkie like some people. I find it irritating when dudes give a .44 Magnum to some girl or teenager and laugh when they just about lose it. Or knock their heads. I'm like, that's just not a good way to introduce new shooters. Or get them to like shooting. So I may have shied away from someone like that. I can almost for certain say I've never even seen an M1917 in real life. And .44 special is an anomaly. Not many Hand Ejectors floating around at my range.

You know how it is, a lot of people are all about the Glocks and be like, you're gonna die if you don't learn how to run a Glock and carry a G19 all the time. Blaaaaaa. I'm not saying Glocks are bad guns, I'm just saying revolvers work better for me and my lifestyle. But I digress.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top