otis24
Member
We know that in the realm of self defense, misses don't count; only hits. That being said, in my opinion, it is easier to get hits with a weapon that fits your hands well. I have a S&W Shield 9mm for concealed carry when I travel. It fits my hand extremely well. Particularly with the addition of grip extensions on the magazines. For a trail gun, I have a 686-3 and a Ruger Vaquero .357. I know that the 686 is one of the finest revolvers ever made. But it is a little large for my hands. For a DA revolver, a K frame seems to suit me best. The arguments of DA revolver vs SA aside, if I found myself in the field, I would probably opt to carry the Vaquero just based on how it fits my hands. When I have a free weekend, I plan on doing a comparison shoot to see how my grouping is with each revolver. Is there anyone else here who would choose a "lesser" gun (K frame vs L for instance) based upon how it fits your hand?