".a renaissance of interest in revolvers. . ." Michael Bane. You think that's true?

Talking to some LGS workers they do say that any shooter quality older revolvers sell faster than they used to.

That could be because there has not been any serious, nation wide attempts at gun control for the past couple of years. There was a spike in semiauto sales from people that worried they were going to be banned from owning a high capacity gun and wanted to buy one before any legislation was enacted. Now people are buying what they want.
 
That could be because there has not been any serious, nation wide attempts at gun control for the past couple of years. There was a spike in semiauto sales from people that worried they were going to be banned from owning a high capacity gun and wanted to buy one before any legislation was enacted. Now people are buying what they want.

That and coupled with the fact that there is at least some returning interest in revolvers. I'm sure we all remember back 15 years ago when nice Smiths could be had for a song because everybody was on the semi auto wagon. I would guess that it's just normalizing back to normal now that the autos have become boring. I don't see revolvers becoming the majority, but many are admitting they have their place and even some advantage.
 
Since I like shooting nice tight groups at 25,50, and 100 yards I'll stick with my Model's 14, 17,48,57 and my Dan Wesson .357's and .44 mags.

Except for 1 Ruger LC9 for a summer CC gun only own wood and steel firearms.

If they were good enough for Skeeter.....
 
Actually, the audacity of a range to keep you safe, and second, to manage it's liability:

It is generally not a brass grab by the range. It is a safety issue. After numerous incidents of brass retrievers (or golden retrievers as they are known) reaching in to adjacent bays, being flagged by loaded weapons as a result of their actions, and/or literally being at the knees of other shooters with a hot range, ranges have felt in some cases the need to make such policy.

When retrievers are in the act of adjacent bay reaching for stray brass at a range that allows holster drawing, that presents the likelihood that said retriever can be flagged by a loaded weapon going in to or out of a holster.

Hopefully, safety is the policy's only motivation; however, even with mixed motives, the unsafe actions of some 'gatherers' has caused this policy. Gathering should be fine when the range is cold, but some of the big ranges with multiple bays and people queued up to shoot may only go cold for when a safety issue makes it necessary.

If you're the only guy on the line, generally RO's should care less even if you're down on all fours. If ten or twelve of the fourteen bays are full and the range is hot, understandably perhaps, don't be reaching over at another guys ankles whilst he is manipulating and firing his weapon.

Not agreeing or disagreeing, just saying there are cases where the range is acting out of safety and liability risk management.

A PERIODIC HALT TO THE FIRING, TO MAKE THE RANGE COLD AND ENABLE SHOOTERS TO POLICE UP THEIR OWN BRASS WOULD SOLVE THE PROBLEM. FOR EXAMPLE, A 3 MIN BREAK AFTER 1/2 HOUR OF SHOOTING, OR A 5 MIN BREAK AFTER AN HOUR OF SHOOTING COULD WORK. RUNNING A COLORED MAGIC MARKER OVER THE BASES OF THE CARTRIDGES AS THEY SIT IN ROWS IN THE AMMO BOX, IS AN EASY WAY TO ID WHICH BRASS IS YOURS……

REACHING OVER ANKLES OR INTO ANOTHER PERSON'S PORT OR LANE SPACE WHILE THAT PERSON IS SHOOTING A WEAPON IS DEFINITELY NOT SAFE, AND SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED ! ! ! RULES AGAINST THAT TYPE OF BEHAVIOR SHOULD BE PROMULGATED AND VIGOROUSLY ENFORCED, INSTEAD OF A RULE THAT THE RANGE OWNS A SHOOTER'S BRASS IF IT HITS THE FLOOR. THAT'S JUST POOR RANGE MANAGEMENT, AND IT DOES NOTHING TO TEACH RANGE SAFETY---ESPECIALLY TO NEW SHOOTERS…..

SIGNS SHOULD BE POSTED. THE FIRST INFRACTION WOULD MERIT A WARNING, AND A RECORD OF THE SHOOTER'S NAME ON A LIST. IF A SECOND INFRACTION OCCURRED, THE SHOOTER COULD BE EJECTED FROM THE RANGE THAT DAY, BUT ALLOWED TO RETURN. IF A THIRD INFRACTION OCCURRED, THAT PERSON SHOULD BE BANNED FROM SHOOTING AT THE RANGE, AS IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY CANNOT FOLLOW THE RULES, AND THEIR PRESENCE POSES A THREAT TO THE SAFETY OF EVERYONE ON THE RANGE…...
 
I'm one of the "Geezers". These were my 'working guns' for many years. Still take them to the range; still outscore the younger crowd with their plastic guns. (Not saying I don't own any.... I do. But wheelguns will always be tops.)
 

Attachments

  • Colt .357.JPG
    Colt .357.JPG
    78.6 KB · Views: 92
  • .38 Bodyguard.JPG
    .38 Bodyguard.JPG
    195.4 KB · Views: 79
Have both but look on semis as tools and revolvers as prized possessions which always go to the range. More enjoyment to shoot in my case since the early 60's and more accurate in my hands.

Nothing at all against semis, but they do not ring my bells.

My primary reason to own firearms is for pleasure, not self defense, but someone breaking in could find a shotgun, semi, or revolver ruining his day.
 
In these days of throwaway, mass produced products I think the growing appreciation of revolvers reflects a growing appreciation of the industrial arts in general. Growing numbers of collectors of old precision tools and other machine items reflects an appreciation of old word design and craftsmanship.
 
I'm going to visit my LGS this morning as soon as they open. They're having a big S&W sale and selling S&W Model 642s for $329.00! I don't need one, but my nickel-plated Model 37 is too nice to ride on my ankle at work anymore. :D
 
I'm going to visit my LGS this morning as soon as they open. They're having a big S&W sale and selling S&W Model 642s for $329.00! I don't

need one, but my nickel-plated Model 37 is too nice to ride on my ankle at work anymore. :D


Nice, I got my 642 a couple years ago and they had about 8 in stock if I remember right. A few of them were the non lock version, that was the only reason I bought the gun. (first modern S&W rev I have bought in a long time, I now search out the used revolver display cases!)
 
One of the things the amazing work by TK Custom on my revolvers has reminded me is that the platform's capabilities remain to some extent a kept secret.

Perhaps because revolver manufacturers are generally not shipping their products out the door with the top shelf action the platform is capable of, the revolver is not respected as it's capabilities remain hidden in it's baser forms of mass production.

Maybe the last revolver to go out the door in mass close to peak condition would be the Colt Pythons which Jeff Cooper and others have called the best revolver ever produced. These really were custom fitted revolvers, but produced on a large scale.

Again, as the web site reminds us, ""In the hands of knowledgeable persons the revolver is more than an equal of any other defensive handgun." Thunder Ranch®
 
Last edited:
A renaissance of interest in revolvers ? You mean there is anything else ???

I've been back and forth between revolvers and crapamatics (yes I call them that NOW).....so many times it makes my head spin. I have finally come full circle, back to where I started - revolvers. And I am here to stay. It feels good.

So, again I ask......regarding revolvers......is there anything else ??? (Not for ME, anyway !)
 
Last edited:
Besides the "cool" factor I think there are a couple of points that are significant factors which will point to increased revolver sales. The first is there are locations where new laws have been passed in recent years which restrict magazine capacity. If you are limited to let's say seven rounds in a magazine your not giving up much in picking a revolver instead. Faster reloads aside. The other thing is there are a lot more people who are buying guns that have no prior history of handling firearms. Loading/unloading and a few other mechanics are just simpler and less intimidating for a novice with a revolver. Revolvers are not going to come close to selling more than the semi's but I think they will only increase and that's a good thing.
 
My wife is a prime example of a revolver user.

She shoots a Buckmark accurately at the range and sometimes a Ruger SR9, but both give her fits charging the chamber. Her J frame is her go to for home defense and presents no handling problems. If the J misfires, she just pulls the trigger a second time but if the semis present a feeding problem, she is in trouble. She always worked out and is in very good shape, but slides can be stubborn with small hands.

As far as faster reloads go, she can charge a cylinder quickly with no problem but working the slide on a semi can be a problem even not under stress.
 
At 70 I still love shooting my M629-6.5 and my M69. I don't fire many rounds, but the range quite often goes quiet to see what the hell just happened when I touch one off. One day I put the first 6 from the 6.5 into the black at 50' on a B-2, standing. I had a small cadre of bottom feeders wondering how I did that. Hopefully some of them went out to get a wheel gun, although nobody wanted to fire it.
 
Used to have 9 semi's and one revolver. Now it's 3 semi's and 9 revolvers.


Yeah I know what you mean. Back in 2001 I had one revolver and one pistol. Now I have 24 revolvers and two pistols.
 
Revolvers will make a come back when Laws in California and NY and other places make them a legal option.

If the list of auto's on the california roster falls to zero, single actions and revolvers are the only ones exempt from microstamping.

NY 7 round limit makes autos like glocks and M&P not competitive.

Our local gun shops only have used glocks now and Glock 43's.

You don't realize what a 7 round magazine limit is doing.

NO ONE other than range competitors wants a large empty plastic pistol with 10 rounds on the range and 7 in the concealed carry role or home defense.

1911's are looking good as are Revolvers and tiny 9mm pistols here in NY.

I am shocked at how few glocks and M&Ps I see on the shelves.
 
The 7 round limit in the safe act was thrown out in federal court in 2013. it is back to 10 again.
 
New York gun owners—who strongly opposed passage of the anti-gun SAFE Act back in 2013—have now cast their votes against the semi-auto firearm registration portion of the law, this time by simply ignoring the requirement.

Recently released New York state police data indicate that out of an estimated 1 million semi-automatic firearms required to be registered under the law, 23,847 people have registered only 44,485 of the guns—about a 4 percent compliance rate.

Under the SAFE Act, noncompliance with the registration of one's guns could result in either a misdemeanor or felony charge, with the possibility of one to four years in prison—so Gov. Andrew Cuomo's SAFE Act has turned hundreds of thousands of gun owners into criminals.

Yet gun owners—familiar with the fact that registration has so often led to confiscation, even in their own state—apparently would rather be considered criminals than to comply with the punitive registration requirements.

For the rest of the article America's 1st Freedom | New York Gun Owners Defy SAFE Act.

Posting represents information only and does not represent any position relative to the article.
 
Last edited:
Wheel guns still make a lot of sense. When I carry my revolvers to the range I seem to be more relaxed. I shoot slower, aim smaller and devour less ammo. I don't know if it's just me on not.
 
l only see bottom feeders at my range. They have maybe 15 different guns for rent.. 2 revolvers of the bunch . A Taurus Tracker 357 and a SW640..Rest auto. The 2 wheel guns are shunned
 
Semis are more popular and people want the biggest, badest ones which hold a large number of cartridges in the magazine like the people in the movies. Many young shooters have never enjoyed the experience of a well made revolver at the range.

For self defense guns, they want to arm themselves for a battle with numerous adversaries, but that just causes spray and pray shooting. They give up the advantage of a handgun which will accept a wide variety of cartridges and often forego adjustable sights in the bargain.

Popular is not always the best measure of a product.
 
Revolver Revolution

I have had my S&W 686 4" .357Magnum x6 for nearly 30yr. This past Spring I bought a little J-Frame for CCL and Home Defense. I hear the argument about "...semi-autos carry more ammo than revolvers...". Sooo... ...I actually DID something about that issue.

I bought an EIGHT-BANGER... S&W 627PC 2.62" .357Magnum with Full Moon Clips:

NOW, I have not only a "larger" capacity handgun, I also have barrels of 1.875", 2.62", and 4.00"... all wheel guns.

:D:D:D Truth be told, I cannot think of a better combination to have! :D:D:D

Not that I'm bias or anything against plastic guns. I HAD plastic guns as kid, but even THOSE plastic guns were plastic 6-Shooter Wheel Guns! :eek::eek::eek:

Target-plus-3-revolvers.jpg
 
Here's my thoughts why the up swing in the revolver numbers/owners.

I believe the new Tupperware owners finally figured out that the plastic guns aren't the only handguns out there. More of the new guys to guns need to wake up.

I own both metal pistols and metal revolvers. I have pistols but just can't really care for them other than the 1911 & CZ. The big heavy revolver just feels right in my hands.

Give me a K or N Frame revolver I'm happy.

Maybe it's watching the cylinder turn mechanically as the hammer moves to the rear. The revolver never died it took a back seat to plastic.

Plastic pistols are cheaper. Ever notice the plastic guns are traded in more and more. They have taken over the used handgun case in every local gun shop. I think every time the gun rags say this new plastic pistol is better over the last year's model the plastic guys can upgrade cheaply. Thus there used guns are stacking up in our lgs.

We don't see so many trade it's with revolvers. Check some lgs offered very little in New and used revolvers, decades ago it's been this way.

Will the revolver ever return to the top of the heap? It never left with us guys who still perfect them.

Supermarket, paper or plastic? Gun shop, metal or plastic?

I think with all these used plastic pistols being traded in its a matter of time as they pile up the lgs may stop accepting them in as trade or offer way less rather then see them pile up in the store. There is a lot of used plastic pistols being offered today. It's a growing problem that no one sees yet.

Funny my first ruger police service six in 357mag will turn 40yo in the springtime. At 40yo your plastic gun has to be retired its life expectancy is over.
 
Last edited:
I have a Smith & Wesson revolver that shipped in about 1882. I have one Smith & Wesson revolver that was issued to my grandfather in 1918. I have one Smith & Wesson revolver that shipped in 1977. I have three Smith & Wesson revolvers that shipped in 1982. And I have one that shipped last Tuesday! (Actually, it shipped sometime this month, and I bought it over the weekend!) All of them are functional, and most of them have better triggers now than when they were made. Except for the Model 1½ in .32 S&W, I would and do trust any of them with my life and the lives of my family. Don't know that I would do that with anything plastic.
 
I was done thinking about a plastic pistol when the Leo's were experiencing the magazine's coming apart on there very first new glocks with the bullets all over the ground. Someone forgot the glue I guess.

When a gun doesn't work it becomes a throwing piece plastic guns aren't heavy enough to do any damage.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top