".a renaissance of interest in revolvers. . ." Michael Bane. You think that's true?

Talking to some LGS workers they do say that any shooter quality older revolvers sell faster than they used to.

That could be because there has not been any serious, nation wide attempts at gun control for the past couple of years. There was a spike in semiauto sales from people that worried they were going to be banned from owning a high capacity gun and wanted to buy one before any legislation was enacted. Now people are buying what they want.
 
That could be because there has not been any serious, nation wide attempts at gun control for the past couple of years. There was a spike in semiauto sales from people that worried they were going to be banned from owning a high capacity gun and wanted to buy one before any legislation was enacted. Now people are buying what they want.

That and coupled with the fact that there is at least some returning interest in revolvers. I'm sure we all remember back 15 years ago when nice Smiths could be had for a song because everybody was on the semi auto wagon. I would guess that it's just normalizing back to normal now that the autos have become boring. I don't see revolvers becoming the majority, but many are admitting they have their place and even some advantage.
 
Since I like shooting nice tight groups at 25,50, and 100 yards I'll stick with my Model's 14, 17,48,57 and my Dan Wesson .357's and .44 mags.

Except for 1 Ruger LC9 for a summer CC gun only own wood and steel firearms.

If they were good enough for Skeeter.....
 
Actually, the audacity of a range to keep you safe, and second, to manage it's liability:

It is generally not a brass grab by the range. It is a safety issue. After numerous incidents of brass retrievers (or golden retrievers as they are known) reaching in to adjacent bays, being flagged by loaded weapons as a result of their actions, and/or literally being at the knees of other shooters with a hot range, ranges have felt in some cases the need to make such policy.

When retrievers are in the act of adjacent bay reaching for stray brass at a range that allows holster drawing, that presents the likelihood that said retriever can be flagged by a loaded weapon going in to or out of a holster.

Hopefully, safety is the policy's only motivation; however, even with mixed motives, the unsafe actions of some 'gatherers' has caused this policy. Gathering should be fine when the range is cold, but some of the big ranges with multiple bays and people queued up to shoot may only go cold for when a safety issue makes it necessary.

If you're the only guy on the line, generally RO's should care less even if you're down on all fours. If ten or twelve of the fourteen bays are full and the range is hot, understandably perhaps, don't be reaching over at another guys ankles whilst he is manipulating and firing his weapon.

Not agreeing or disagreeing, just saying there are cases where the range is acting out of safety and liability risk management.

A PERIODIC HALT TO THE FIRING, TO MAKE THE RANGE COLD AND ENABLE SHOOTERS TO POLICE UP THEIR OWN BRASS WOULD SOLVE THE PROBLEM. FOR EXAMPLE, A 3 MIN BREAK AFTER 1/2 HOUR OF SHOOTING, OR A 5 MIN BREAK AFTER AN HOUR OF SHOOTING COULD WORK. RUNNING A COLORED MAGIC MARKER OVER THE BASES OF THE CARTRIDGES AS THEY SIT IN ROWS IN THE AMMO BOX, IS AN EASY WAY TO ID WHICH BRASS IS YOURS……

REACHING OVER ANKLES OR INTO ANOTHER PERSON'S PORT OR LANE SPACE WHILE THAT PERSON IS SHOOTING A WEAPON IS DEFINITELY NOT SAFE, AND SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED ! ! ! RULES AGAINST THAT TYPE OF BEHAVIOR SHOULD BE PROMULGATED AND VIGOROUSLY ENFORCED, INSTEAD OF A RULE THAT THE RANGE OWNS A SHOOTER'S BRASS IF IT HITS THE FLOOR. THAT'S JUST POOR RANGE MANAGEMENT, AND IT DOES NOTHING TO TEACH RANGE SAFETY---ESPECIALLY TO NEW SHOOTERS…..

SIGNS SHOULD BE POSTED. THE FIRST INFRACTION WOULD MERIT A WARNING, AND A RECORD OF THE SHOOTER'S NAME ON A LIST. IF A SECOND INFRACTION OCCURRED, THE SHOOTER COULD BE EJECTED FROM THE RANGE THAT DAY, BUT ALLOWED TO RETURN. IF A THIRD INFRACTION OCCURRED, THAT PERSON SHOULD BE BANNED FROM SHOOTING AT THE RANGE, AS IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY CANNOT FOLLOW THE RULES, AND THEIR PRESENCE POSES A THREAT TO THE SAFETY OF EVERYONE ON THE RANGE…...
 
I'm one of the "Geezers". These were my 'working guns' for many years. Still take them to the range; still outscore the younger crowd with their plastic guns. (Not saying I don't own any.... I do. But wheelguns will always be tops.)
 

Attachments

  • Colt .357.JPG
    Colt .357.JPG
    78.6 KB · Views: 92
  • .38 Bodyguard.JPG
    .38 Bodyguard.JPG
    195.4 KB · Views: 79
Have both but look on semis as tools and revolvers as prized possessions which always go to the range. More enjoyment to shoot in my case since the early 60's and more accurate in my hands.

Nothing at all against semis, but they do not ring my bells.

My primary reason to own firearms is for pleasure, not self defense, but someone breaking in could find a shotgun, semi, or revolver ruining his day.
 
In these days of throwaway, mass produced products I think the growing appreciation of revolvers reflects a growing appreciation of the industrial arts in general. Growing numbers of collectors of old precision tools and other machine items reflects an appreciation of old word design and craftsmanship.
 
I'm going to visit my LGS this morning as soon as they open. They're having a big S&W sale and selling S&W Model 642s for $329.00! I don't need one, but my nickel-plated Model 37 is too nice to ride on my ankle at work anymore. :D
 
I'm going to visit my LGS this morning as soon as they open. They're having a big S&W sale and selling S&W Model 642s for $329.00! I don't

need one, but my nickel-plated Model 37 is too nice to ride on my ankle at work anymore. :D


Nice, I got my 642 a couple years ago and they had about 8 in stock if I remember right. A few of them were the non lock version, that was the only reason I bought the gun. (first modern S&W rev I have bought in a long time, I now search out the used revolver display cases!)
 
One of the things the amazing work by TK Custom on my revolvers has reminded me is that the platform's capabilities remain to some extent a kept secret.

Perhaps because revolver manufacturers are generally not shipping their products out the door with the top shelf action the platform is capable of, the revolver is not respected as it's capabilities remain hidden in it's baser forms of mass production.

Maybe the last revolver to go out the door in mass close to peak condition would be the Colt Pythons which Jeff Cooper and others have called the best revolver ever produced. These really were custom fitted revolvers, but produced on a large scale.

Again, as the web site reminds us, ""In the hands of knowledgeable persons the revolver is more than an equal of any other defensive handgun." Thunder Ranch®
 
Last edited:
A renaissance of interest in revolvers ? You mean there is anything else ???

I've been back and forth between revolvers and crapamatics (yes I call them that NOW).....so many times it makes my head spin. I have finally come full circle, back to where I started - revolvers. And I am here to stay. It feels good.

So, again I ask......regarding revolvers......is there anything else ??? (Not for ME, anyway !)
 
Last edited:
Besides the "cool" factor I think there are a couple of points that are significant factors which will point to increased revolver sales. The first is there are locations where new laws have been passed in recent years which restrict magazine capacity. If you are limited to let's say seven rounds in a magazine your not giving up much in picking a revolver instead. Faster reloads aside. The other thing is there are a lot more people who are buying guns that have no prior history of handling firearms. Loading/unloading and a few other mechanics are just simpler and less intimidating for a novice with a revolver. Revolvers are not going to come close to selling more than the semi's but I think they will only increase and that's a good thing.
 
My wife is a prime example of a revolver user.

She shoots a Buckmark accurately at the range and sometimes a Ruger SR9, but both give her fits charging the chamber. Her J frame is her go to for home defense and presents no handling problems. If the J misfires, she just pulls the trigger a second time but if the semis present a feeding problem, she is in trouble. She always worked out and is in very good shape, but slides can be stubborn with small hands.

As far as faster reloads go, she can charge a cylinder quickly with no problem but working the slide on a semi can be a problem even not under stress.
 
At 70 I still love shooting my M629-6.5 and my M69. I don't fire many rounds, but the range quite often goes quiet to see what the hell just happened when I touch one off. One day I put the first 6 from the 6.5 into the black at 50' on a B-2, standing. I had a small cadre of bottom feeders wondering how I did that. Hopefully some of them went out to get a wheel gun, although nobody wanted to fire it.
 
Used to have 9 semi's and one revolver. Now it's 3 semi's and 9 revolvers.


Yeah I know what you mean. Back in 2001 I had one revolver and one pistol. Now I have 24 revolvers and two pistols.
 
Revolvers will make a come back when Laws in California and NY and other places make them a legal option.

If the list of auto's on the california roster falls to zero, single actions and revolvers are the only ones exempt from microstamping.

NY 7 round limit makes autos like glocks and M&P not competitive.

Our local gun shops only have used glocks now and Glock 43's.

You don't realize what a 7 round magazine limit is doing.

NO ONE other than range competitors wants a large empty plastic pistol with 10 rounds on the range and 7 in the concealed carry role or home defense.

1911's are looking good as are Revolvers and tiny 9mm pistols here in NY.

I am shocked at how few glocks and M&Ps I see on the shelves.
 
The 7 round limit in the safe act was thrown out in federal court in 2013. it is back to 10 again.
 
Back
Top