An Email From Obama

Status
Not open for further replies.

s1mp13m4n

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2012
Messages
778
Reaction score
490
Location
Virginia, USA
Hello fellow 2nd Amendment Fans. During the time of the election I signed up for White House updates, so when I checked my email I found this email waiting for me to read. I thought I would share the contents here. I want to say thanks to all of you who are doing what is right and standing up for our gun rights. Lets use this info to help us in our fight.


A Message from President Obama about Your Petition on Reducing Gun Violence

By Bruce Reed, Chief of Staff to Vice President Biden

In the days since the tragedy in Newtown, Americans from all over the country have called for action to deter mass shootings and reduce gun violence. Hundreds of thousands of you have signed petitions on We the People.

I'm writing you today to thank you for speaking up, to update you on an important development, and to encourage you to continue engaging with the White House on this critical issue.

First, you should know that President Obama is paying close to attention to the public response to this tragedy. In fact, he sat down to record a message specifically for those of you who have joined the conversation using We the People. Watch it now:



On Wednesday, the President outlined a series of first steps we can take to begin the work of ending this cycle of violence. This is what he said:

"We know this is a complex issue that stirs deeply held passions and political divides. And as I said on Sunday night, there's no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence in our society. We're going to need to work on making access to mental health care at least as easy as access to a gun. We're going to need to look more closely at a culture that all too often glorifies guns and violence. And any actions we must take must begin inside the home and inside our hearts.

But the fact that this problem is complex can no longer be an excuse for doing nothing. The fact that we can't prevent every act of violence doesn't mean we can't steadily reduce the violence, and prevent the very worst violence."

Vice President Biden has been asked to work with members of the Administration, Congress, and the general public to come up with a set of concrete policy proposals by next month -- proposals the President intends to push swiftly. The President asked the Vice President to lead this effort in part because he wrote and passed the 1994 Crime Bill that helped law enforcement bring down the rate of violent crime in America. That bill included the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.

As the Vice President's Chief of Staff, I'm going to do everything I can to ensure we run a process that includes perspectives from all sides of the issue, which is why I wanted to respond to your petition myself. Two decades ago, as domestic policy adviser in the Clinton White House, I first worked with Joe Biden as he fought to enact the Crime Bill, the assault weapons ban, and the Brady Bill. I will never forget what a key role the voices of concerned citizens like you played in that vital process.

The President called on Congress to pass important legislation "banning the sale of military-style assault weapons," "banning the sale of high-capacity ammunition clips," and "requiring background checks before all gun purchases, so that criminals can’t take advantage of legal loopholes to buy a gun from somebody who won’t take the responsibility of doing a background check at all."

An issue this serious and complex isn't going to be resolved with a single legislative proposal or policy prescription. And let's be clear, any action we take will respect the Second Amendment. As the President said:

"Look, like the majority of Americans, I believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. This country has a strong tradition of gun ownership that's been handed down from generation to generation. Obviously across the country there are regional differences. There are differences between how people feel in urban areas and rural areas. And the fact is the vast majority of gun owners in America are responsible -- they buy their guns legally and they use them safely, whether for hunting or sport shooting, collection or protection.

But you know what, I am also betting that the majority -- the vast majority -- of responsible, law-abiding gun owners would be some of the first to say that we should be able to keep an irresponsible, law-breaking few from buying a weapon of war. I'm willing to bet that they don't think that using a gun and using common sense are incompatible ideas -- that an unbalanced man shouldn't be able to get his hands on a military-style assault rifle so easily; that in this age of technology, we should be able to check someone's criminal records before he or she can check out at a gun show; that if we work harder to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people, there would be fewer atrocities like the one in Newtown -- or any of the lesser-known tragedies that visit small towns and big cities all across America every day."

The President said it best: "Ultimately if this effort is to succeed it's going to require the help of the American people -- it's going to require all of you. If we're going to change things, it's going to take a wave of Americans -- mothers and fathers, daughters and sons, pastors, law enforcement, mental health professionals -- and, yes, gun owners -- standing up and saying 'enough' on behalf of our kids."

So let's continue this conversation and get something meaningful done. If you have additional ideas and are interested in further engagement with the White House on this issue, please let us know and share your thoughts here:

Share Your Thoughts on Reducing Gun Violence | The White House

Thank you for speaking out and staying involved.
Stay Connected

Tell us what you think about this response and We the People.

Stay connected to the White House by signing up for periodic email updates from President Obama and other senior administration officials.
 
Register to hide this ad
This was what I left for the "President to consider":

[ I agree that we need to make some "meaningful" changes to keep this type of evil from ever surfacing again. I think we should start the discussion with a look at one basic fact. 40, 50, 60 years ago we had far less gun regulation than we have today - but we did not have this type of senseless evil violence. WHY is that?? What has changed. I believe the only way we will effectively address this issue of violence is if we start the discussion at this very basic fact.
More gun laws are not needed. We need to change the things that we (the government for the most part) has done over these past few decades that have allowed this evil to surface in this country. The answers lie more in First Ammendmant issues than Second. A sector of our country has continuously pushed for and allowed every moral fiber in our culture to be stripped out leaving us with what we have today. Undoing the damage that has been done to our culture will not happen overnight and it will not be easy, but this is truly the battle that needs to be faught - not gun laws. For the interim I do believe that the proposal today by the NRA makes sense. We have armed guards in airports, shopping malls, sports events - why not our schools???]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll let others respond in a point-by-point manner. Let me just say that I literally cringe these days when I hear someone propose that we have a "conversation" about an issue. This has become a code word, which when deciphered, means, "Let me tell you how it is. If you agree, tell me that I am absolutely correct. If you disagree, shut-up...we already know what you think, that's why we are having this conversation."
 
I do not mean to cause any issues or debate or anything. I just wanted to share the email that I was sent from signing up to keep up with the election stuff from the White House. :) I feel like I might be looked upon as a spammer or something, DOH, I do not want to get that type or rep around here. :)
 
I do not mean to cause any issues or debate or anything. I just wanted to share the email that I was sent from signing up to keep up with the election stuff from the White House. :) I feel like I might be looked upon as a spammer or something, DOH, I do not want to get that type or rep around here. :)

In my case, I was talking about the "conversation" reference in your e-mail. I also signed-up for e-mails from the enemy camp back in 2008.
 
I can't see Biden actually getting anything done with their "blue ribbon panel", except maybe to rubber-stamp Feinstein's new AWB. Then again, pushing a hot issue to a "commission" is a time honored way of not doing anything, except buying time until the hot issue is supplanted by a new one. So, maybe there's reason to hope.

I responded on the email link above to send comment to the WH about my views on new gun control, this is what I wrote:

Guns. Legally owned, and in the hands of good people, they are a force for good. In the hands of criminals or the deranged, they can be terrible weapons. It's not the gun, or the configuration or type of gun. It's the person wielding it. Always has been, always will be. Heinous acts are not the result of having any particular weapon available. They are the result of the intent and ability of the person who wishes to harm others.

It doesn’t matter if it’s a so-called “assault weapon” (a complete fabrication of the media), or a hunting rifle (aka “sniper rifle”), a shotgun, pistol, revolver, edged weapon, bat, club, or bare hands. Or explosives made from fuel oil and fertilizer. The act is not dependent on the instrument; its ONLY necessity is the perpetrator. A car through a playground at recess at an elementary school could easily cause the same death toll as the Sandy Hook shootings, but I doubt that in the aftermath we would be in a debate about banning cars.

If my self defense, or the defense of my family, home, or community comes down to the (god-forbid) use of weapons, guns specifically, then I want the best equipment I can get. I have a right to it, and I am not willing to surrender that right because of the criminal misuse of similar weapons. Gun bans and restrictions have never stopped the determined criminal or psychopath. All they do is disarm the law-abiding, while those that would prey on them have are free to murder and maim.

Disarming people who have committed no crimes and are responsible gun owners is morally reprehensible, and in my view is in violation not only of the law, but also of the principles that this nation was founded on. I will not let what others "think" I need dictate how I may defend myself; not as long as I am acting within the law.


Just part of a longer letter I drafted to have handy just to send off to media/elected officials. I redraft as I gather new information, that way I can keep up the rate of fire without repeating myself too much. I would encourage everyone else to do the same. I can't guarantee that it will have a positive effect, but I can guarantee that doing nothing will probably encourage a new AWB, and whatever comes after. We need to let them know we've had enough of being the scapegoats everytime a lunatic uses a gun, and we won't accept the blame. WRITE YOUR REPRESENTATIVES!
 
Last edited:
When we took GOD out of schools, and out of the Government we went down the wrong road. The proliferation of violent video games and the mindset of youth today are part of the problem. The Instant news reporting of every violent happening gives those with some mental instability the idea's for their "Moment of fame". I am not against the 1st amendment, but many reporters have gone too far, and how many "copy cat" crimes happen. Yes, we do need some controls on who can acquire firearms, but we also need the same controls on the news media.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top