Well I'm glad S&W has "resolved " all the issues with the BG.
My BG was test fired by S&W on 2/20/13.
My firing pin broke within the first month.
But S&W has resolved all those issues, I guess mine just slipped by some how. Darn my luck.. Thank goodness I noticed it at home.. Humm, I wonder how many BG owners are totally unaware this issue even exist? Would be awful bad to find out about it at a bad time wouldn't it.. Yeah , that Life time warranty would do them a lot of good then ...
I am guessing it is those same engineers who thought and still think the MIM firing pin is great that think the MIM barrel is great as well..
Further hint.. If anyone really thinks it was a "small number" of firing pins that suffered casualties you might want to look up an old friend named Google..
The gun forums are littered with accounts of owners having this problem. many had multiple instances reported.
Few my ***..
"Littered with accounts", huh?
Yes, I'm familiar with the online reports of broken firing pins.
I'm also familiar with how sometimes information related online may not be the most exact or accurate (let alone factual). I've had more than enough opportunity to have someone bring me a gun, telling me that such & such part was broken ... only to examine it and discover it wasn't what they were thinking at all. It happens.
Also, just because a new gun may be test-fired at a certain date, the only thing you can really know about it is that was when it was test-fired. It may not mean it contains all the latest revised parts, as they typically continue using existing parts while revised parts are incorporated into inventories. (Unless, of course, it involves an actual problem identified and handled as a Recall.)
For example, they continued to use the original M&P striker assemblies, slide stop assemblies and extractors in the M&P pistol line, changing over to the new parts at various times within the different models. It wasn't "overnight". (FWIW, both striker assemblies are still being illustrated in the last armorer manual, as there are a LOT of M&P's still running just fine with the original strikers ... but they did feel it possible to make the part more robust, and better able to withstand the efforts of some owners who liked to dry-fire a LOT.)
Bear in mind that as much as the issue may have been discussed online, it obviously didn't involve ALL of the BG380's produced (or even a significant number of them, from what I've been told at different times). Yes, they identified a revision they felt was a good change.
Of the less than a dozen guys I personally know who own and use BG380's, only ONE of them has experienced a broken firing pin. It broke very quickly, but the replacement firing pin (from last year) is still working just fine. I can't say that if I'd known another 100 or 1000 guys/gals with BG380's that I'd have encountered more firing pin breakages, but neither can I say I would have, either.
BTW, did you let them repair/replace the broken firing pin in
your BG380? When they do, go out and shoot the snot out of it (using good quality ammo), and the let us know how it's doing.
FWIW, most LE agencies I've known of usually pull guns if they identify a problem, or even a perceived problem. (Remember the incident with LAPD, where they decertified about 3K personally owned/authorized G21's due to some scattered reports of light-strikes?)
Last I heard, LAPD hasn't pulled or decertified the BG380 because of a concern over broken firing pins (or MIM barrels blowing up), and their folks have apparently bought enough of them for any "trend" to have emerged and been identified by now.
I'm not saying that things don't happen every now and again with any machine, including revolvers and semiauto pistols. That's the nature of machinery.
I won't bore you with the details of the late Gen3 Glock 9mm I bought that exhibited consistent erratic ejection issues with an assortment of ammo (standard pressure , +P & +P+ loads). Nothing at all like my older similar model. As a Glock armorer, I think I went through 4 extractors, 5 ejectors and 2 RSA's ... and found and dressed a burred edge on the slide's extra recess ... before I finally got the gun up and running in what I consider a normal manner. Now it's fine. (The next step would have been to return the gun to the company for replacement of the slide, and/or the whole gun.)
Sometimes things happen ... and it's not like Glock or S&W are exactly new kids on the block, right?
I haven't recertified as a Sig pistol armorer, but they were on their 2nd .45 extractor design for the 220 (necessitated by the solid slide) when I went through the class last time, and it was having problems in some guns (supposedly due to the pre-tensioning issues, and it being a use-once part, it had to be replaced if ever removed), and since then they've made 2 more revision/design changes to the .45 extractor.
Every once in a while, things may happen that require attention and correction.
