OK, for the sake of discussion.... I'll add some more of my 3 cents in.
First off, two-bit cowboy: I freaking love that gun. I do remember it and it is one of the ones I think about being a good custom job. And I feel like if I saw that gun in a store, I would find it MORE desirable than a run of the mill 36. Which is part of the problem and discussion. The argument that customizing an older gun that is no longer made because it hurts the value is certainly true. But it may end up being more desirable to some.... Probably not all, but some. So.. Now obviously if it's a horrible job, the less people it will be desirable to and would be a shame.
But like that relief on the trigger guard, I find that a smart mod. Some people might not. I actually have this problem more with my model 19 than I do the 442 but when you are holding the gun at a low ready, and your throw it up to slay your paper target quickly, sometimes my trigger finger does not make that transition very intuitively or well on my 19. It gets hung up. And I've never really noticed that on any other gun I have. It feels a bit awkward. So if I was going all out, I would do that.
It's also one of the issues with milsurp rifles that I sometimes don't get. Someone will post a 1917 or 03 that had been nicely modified to a sporter gun for hunting. And invariably several people will say about how it's an injustice. And I get that at some point there aren't going to be any more. And if we just modify them all, there won't be any examples of the gun in it's WWII form. But I think we have a long way to go before that happens. And I guess people either don't know or forget that those guns were kind of like, prevalent and that's just what people did for hunting rifles a lot back then.
Now lets say I said I was going to mod up a currently made lock gun. Most people would not have an issue with that at all. But what if Smith came out tomorrow and said they're closing their doors and you will no longer be able to get any newly made smith and wesson revolvers. And that came true. Wouldn't all of a sudden that change the perspective? I mean the old ones that aren't being made any longer are desirable to people. More than likely the new crop of revolvers will be desirable to people, if they no longer were making them. But we can't predict what's going to happen. That could happen with a certain model.
So to me the argument of never modifying a gun that isn't being made any longer doesn't completely hold water. I get it. I understand we want to preserve them. But if you fall down on this side of the argemnt you almost have to take a no custom policy with any gun. Cause honestly, there's a good chance any model could be discontinued like tomorrow. And even though a lot of people have a problem with the lock models, they may one day be desirable.
Anyways.....
I feel like customizing a gun is someone's prerogative. Regardless of the condition of the gun or desirability of others.
Now, what do I want the gun for? Home Defense. I have 3 revolvers right now. The 442, The 19 and a Colt DS. The Colt DS I can't shoot for **** and it irritates me. EXCEPT, I like all of it's features much more than the smiths. 6 rounds, the stocks are great, it feels great. The size is great. If I shot it well, I would not want for another revolver. But I don't. And it's the nature of that trigger I think. But really that gun would be a really good choice for Home defense and carry. Like the best of both worlds. But things never are that easy in my world.
So, I have a 442 for my carry gun and the 19 works for home defense. But the 19 is just big. It doesn't need to be so big to be a good home defense gun. And I don't need adjustable sights for that.
So yeah, really I just need another gun. A 2" 10. A 3"10. Etc etc. There are so many that can fit the bill. But therein lies the problem. I have the 19........
But I suppose it's true, it would be cheaper to buy another than cut up this one. However, if I had the money to, I might be inclined to make this gun just how I want, so I could have what I want, and still have a connection to my Step Dad all at the same time. Would that really be that bad of a thing to do? I personally don't think so.
I hope I didn't irritate anyone. I'm just talking about it and I don't disrespect anyones position. I totally get the desire to conserve them how they are if possible. But I also get that if a guy just wants something, I say go for it. LOL.